DanInUticaTampa

3rd might be too much, but I would be ok with it. A 4th, and it is a no brainer. I could see this trade happening only because we are so limited at TE. Otherwise, this frontoffice doesn't seem the type to make the deal.

7-9 means we are getting better. 1-15 means we hired the wrong coach, drafted the wrong players, and overall, got way worse. We go 1-15, that will completly just suck. screw a top 3 draft pick. It has done the lions and rams SO well already...

I picked him up in one of my leagues, but not the rest of them. I kinda wish I took him in all of them after seeing him play more in preseason. Looks like he is going to be a 10 TD guy. Though that is way too premature. For my main league, I grabbed: QB- Rivers QB- Campbell WR Andre Johnson WR Mike Wallace WR Devin Hester RB Matt Forte RB Brandon Jacobs TE Whitten Flex Portis Kicker Tynes Def Eagles Backups RB Thomas jones WR Mckluster WR Victor Cruz RB Fred Jackson QB Josh freeman TE Dustin Keller WR Greg Camarillo It is a pretty deep league, so I think I did well.... I really could use Spillar, because a lot of my RBs have too many questionmarks. But some idiot grabbed spillar in like the 3rd round.

Good call.

The scouting department doesn't make the decisions....

OLB is a huge need on the list as well.

They didn't really slam us like others have. They just say we are starting over, we need some time to rebuild, and we aren't where the others are at right now. It is kind of just stating the obvious. Of course, i am hoping this team goes beyond these expectations.

people can B word about the oline all they want, but the oline was heavily addressed in last years draft..... and I hate to say it, but the OLBs look way worse than the oline right now.... If I had to put in order of our needs, I would say 1) OLB 2) QB 3) T 4) C/MLB/WR

He seems like he would be better suited to play on the outside as a pass rusher, but I guess there is somethine else there that I am missing.

Well, you said it was naive to think that our QBs could start in Arizona. that would imply that you think Lienhart is not even close to as bad as trent edwards. Hey, you were the one calling people naive for thinking Edwards could start in Arizona. But apparently you don't have any reasoning to backup calling people naive And no one had to scrounge for Arizona. There are easy 5 times at least with a worse QB situation than us. Our sucks for sure and I can't wait to rid of edwards for good. But I was just answering your question. And the truth is, edwards would start on other nfl teams. If you wanted to discuss whether or not edwards sucks, then you should have made that poll. But your poll asked if any of the QBs would start on another team... so I guess you argree edwards could start in arizona.... so I guess you voted "yes" in your poll.

Merle, could you please explain why you think lienhart is so much better than edwards, like I asked already?

Like him, I thought the OP was talking about fred until I opened the article.

you saw Green play in the first game? That is quite a trick. I think most people praised it as a depth move. Either way, this team needed tackles.

How so? Arizona looks like a mess, and they don't even know who is going to be starting at week 1. At least we have a pretty good idea of who we are starting. And how about the broncos? They drafted freakin Tebow in hopes he could eventually take orton's place. And then signed Quinn. If you think it is naive to think that Edwards is at least a little bit better than orton, then I don't know what to say to ya. Trent is having a better preseason than a lot of these starting QBs. I wouldn't be surprised that this season edwards looks and plays better than these QBs: -Orton -Leinhart -Kolb -Sanchez -Delhome And if Cutler throws a record of int, I would add cutler to that list as well. Of course, edwards will have to prove himself this season. But right now? I say he is better that those guys. Edwards has never really proven himself, but Those QBs haven't shown that they are any better than edwards. If you think they are better than edwards, that what makes them so special? Becuase quite honestly, our QB situation would either suck, or suck more with any of them on it.

fixed

Same with the cable company down here (Brighthouse). They have had issues like this before with other networks, but they always get resolved like the day before the deadline.

That is what I am afraid of. He will be just enough so that they won't address the QB position next year. Which will just be sad. Even taking a QB prospect in the 2nd or 3rd round would give some hope.

It means the poll sucks just as much as our QBs. IF you wanted real results, have real, unbiased options in the poll. Otherwise it is just a tongue in cheek game to state the obvious. But yes, there are teams our QBs would start on, especially Edwards. It is obvious we are at the bottom when it comes to the QB postion, but we aren't last. We are in better shape than Arizona and Clevland easy. And like others have said, you could easilly argue tampa, jax, raiders, carolina, and others. Kolb even doesn't look like he is doing very well, at all. One that hasn't been mentioned (I don't think) is Sanchez.... the guy is having a WAY worse preseason than our QBs.... The only reason he hasn't been cut is because he is a first rounder from last year. Sanchez has more upside, just because he is still new.... but right now, edwards is very easy better than him. So yeah, our QBs suck. but we aren't the only team in the nfl with QB problems. so you can "LOL" all you want at all your little jokes. You clearly don't know what is going on in the rest of the nfl.

How is putting a player on IR a cost saving move? Isn't it an extra expense to put a player on IR? because you not only have to pay the player on IR, but you have to pay the person that replaces him..... I think the bills are pretty cheap overall, but saying putting a player on IR is a cost saving move makes zero sense.

He still didn't hurt anyone. She isn't claiming to be a victim or claiming he hurt her. In fact, as far as incest goes, she is JUST as guilty as he is. But I don't think she was arrested or charged with anything. If the incest charge was really that big of a deal, they BOTH should have been arrested and charged. They both gave consent, both particpated, it is insane only one of them got arrested for a crime that took two people to do.

No body here shunned cody. There were a lot of people that didn't want us to draft him. But no here said Cody shouldn't be allowed to play in the nfl, shouldn't be allowed to tryout on any team, and should be blacklisted for life. The two situations are completly different. I don't know what the minimum crime should be for condemation. But there are so many players that do things a hundred times worse and are repeat offenders and they actually hurt people. This guy didn't hurt anyone, it happened when he was a kid, and there have been no other issues since then. There is very minimal risk. What would a GM be afraid of what he will do? Is he going to run back and start banging his sister? Is that what you are afraid of? Because I don't see any indication of him doing that. He has no violent history and no history of drug abuse. Right there he is better than a third of this league. The only reason why this is such a big deal is because incest is a huge taboo that is very hard to understand, because in our culture, it is creepy as hell and not many people do it.

BUST!

I would say hardy if Easly wasn't on IR and the other injuries. But I think he makes the team because of the injuries.

ummmmm, not wide recievers. We had one of the best passing defenses in the league last year.

Anyone know anything about Sapp? I don't think I reconize him... The phins got a CB.