molson_golden2002

Conviction records against people who can hire million dollar lawyers are not so great, but go ahead and tell us anyway

He doesn't go after big business you idiot, he goes after criminals in big business. I see how you think, all illegals are killers, robbers and drug fiends, but if they wear a $1,000 suit then the have great moral values and never do anything wrong. You really are a warped individual

Why would I post this? Why don't you read the first paragraph you wrote and then answer your own question. Idiot!

Sure illegals are a 'class' of people. You can classify anything you moron. And news flash Dar Dar, all illegals don't come here to rob, steal and kill, in fact most don't. Just like most G.I.s don't murder civilians in Iraq, just some do. I still find your point laughable that a person has to kill 20 million people to be a bigot. Pretty high standard there! The media and Iraq? LOL, hey, they also don't show how Iraq was better off under Saddam. Don't see much of that in the media, but its the truth. Perhaps the media can focus on the more living space each individual Iraqi who is still alive or has not ran from the country ahead of the chaos now has. There is at least a million fewer souls in the country now. Think of the elbow room!

I went to yahoo news thinking it was cureent and didn't waste anymore time with it

ROTFLMAO! In other words you can't explain it! Lori the dimwit

The link will not open for me and I can't find any mention of this story in the media.

Hate leads to what the Nazis did. They were calling Jews parasites long before they even killed one of them. IF what he is suppose to have said is true, he is a bigot. He called an entire class of people parasites. You don't have a problem with that I understand. Says a lot about you and the Conservative ideology you follow mindlessly. Yup, media pointing out a hatemonger who is to proside over people he considers to be paraistes. Nope, no story there. Just like Iraq shouldn't be a story. 3,000 dead? Hell that happened on 9-11, we should just get use to it and move on. Remember how you Conservatives were saying the media isn't showing the 'progress' in Iraq? LOL

No, just my experience studying human nature. You really are a dumb fvck if you think the Iraqis will start liking each other just because there are more Americans in their country. It's not going to work, that is pretty obvious

No, you wack job, I'm not comparing one guy to an entire regime. LOL!!! I'm saying his thoughts are in line with an ideology that was hateful. One guy won't kill 20 million people, I get that. And yes, this idiot should have freedom of speech, and he should be judged for that. If he says immigrants are parasites then we should say, as in the case of you, that's great, and me, that's wrong. Are you a weed Darin?

It might be time! Really, the best arguments that can be made for conservation, energy independence and alternative energy should be made from the point of view that they could profit America

What's brilliant is your twisting of a simple argument. Let's see, he calls immigrats weeds, and the nazis called the jews parasites. Are not weeds really parasites? No difference. Hate is hate. If this judge really said this he should be shown the door.

What if he said Jews were blood suckers? That's different! That's different! That's different!

Exactly, its all bull sh--. He's just fvcking around with the troops

Get what done? Teach Iraqis to love each other?

WASHINGTON - ExxonMobil Corp. gave $16 million to 43 ideological groups between 1998 and 2005 in a coordinated effort to mislead the public by discrediting the science behind global warming, the Union of Concerned Scientists asserted Wednesday. The report by the science-based nonprofit advocacy group mirrors similar claims by Britain's leading scientific academy. Last September, The Royal Society wrote the oil company asking it to halt support for groups that "misrepresented the science of climate change." ExxonMobil did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the scientific advocacy group's report. Many scientists say accumulating carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from tailpipes and smokestacks are warming the atmosphere like a greenhouse, melting Arctic sea ice, alpine glaciers and disturbing the lives of animals and plants. ExxonMobil lists on its Web site nearly $133 million in 2005 contributions globally, including $6.8 million for "public information and policy research" distributed to more than 140 think-tanks, universities, foundations, associations and other groups. Some of those have publicly disputed the link between greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. But in September, the company said in response to the Royal Society that it funded groups which research "significant policy issues and promote informed discussion on issues of direct relevance to the company." It said the groups do not speak for the company. Alden Meyer, the Union of Concerned Scientists' strategy and policy director, said in a teleconference that ExxonMobil based its tactics on those of tobacco companies, spreading uncertainty by misrepresenting peer-reviewed scientific studies or cherry-picking facts. Dr. James McCarthy, a professor at Harvard University, said the company has sought to "create the illusion of a vigorous debate" about global warming. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070103/ap_on_..._global_warming

Sabres beat teams 2 and 3 on that list recently. Surprised to see the Ducks down at the 5 spot

That's my conclusion. They just market the keystone to the group that buys cheap beer

Priceless!

I'm surprised more people are not angry he is considering extending the stay of more troops.

I think he's buying time till he leaves office

It just adds more weight to the argument that Iraq was one of the stupidest things this nation ever did. That cannnot be pointed out enough. Many people saw this coming, more thought at the time it was a great thing to do, and some idiots still hold that view. Square pegs do not fit into round holes, no matter how much sexy military power you have behind it. No matter how much you wrap the operation in the flag and call those who point out the truth traitors, it was still a very dumb thing to do. Smart men saw that, smart men like Ford. Again, as I have stated before, the South now owns the GOP and we see that in its policies both foreign and domestic. Ford's opposition to the war shows this great change that has taken place in our political parties, a moderate like himself would never make it into the leadership of the GOP today.

I guess Dick disagrees with you:

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=801 HOW OLD IS THE GRAND CANYON? PARK SERVICE WON’T SAY — Orders to Cater to Creationists Makes National Park Agnostic on Geology Washington, DC — Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah's flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park, according to documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). “In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is ‘no comment.’” In a letter released today, PEER urged the new Director of the National Park Service (NPS), Mary Bomar, to end the stalling tactics, remove the book from sale at the park and allow park interpretive rangers to honestly answer questions from the public about the geologic age of the Grand Canyon. PEER is also asking Director Bomar to approve a pamphlet, suppressed since 2002 by Bush appointees, providing guidance for rangers and other interpretive staff in making distinctions between science and religion when speaking to park visitors about geologic issues. In August 2003, Park Superintendent Joe Alston attempted to block the sale at park bookstores of Grand Canyon: A Different View by Tom Vail, a book claiming the Canyon developed on a biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS Headquarters, however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor, NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters and members of Congress that there would be a high-level policy review of the issue. According to a recent NPS response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by PEER, no such review was ever requested, let alone conducted or completed. Park officials have defended the decision to approve the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View, claiming that park bookstores are like libraries, where the broadest range of views are displayed. In fact, however, both law and park policies make it clear that the park bookstores are more like schoolrooms rather than libraries. As such, materials are only to reflect the highest quality science and are supposed to closely support approved interpretive themes. Moreover, unlike a library the approval process is very selective. Records released to PEER show that during 2003, Grand Canyon officials rejected 22 books and other products for bookstore placement while approving only one new sale item — the creationist book. Ironically, in 2005, two years after the Grand Canyon creationist controversy erupted, NPS approved a new directive on “Interpretation and Education (Director’s Order #6) which reinforces the posture that materials on the “history of the Earth must be based on the best scientific evidence available, as found in scholarly sources that have stood the test of scientific peer review and criticism [and] Interpretive and educational programs must refrain from appearing to endorse religious beliefs explaining natural processes.” “As one park geologist said, this is equivalent of Yellowstone National Park selling a book entitled Geysers of Old Faithful: Nostrils of Satan,” Ruch added, pointing to the fact that previous NPS leadership ignored strong protests from both its own scientists and leading geological societies against the agency approval of the creationist book. “We sincerely hope that the new Director of the Park Service now has the autonomy to do her job.”

Nothing hurts worst than the truth! http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/10/juan-williams-scream/ Juan Williams Hits His Limit on Fox News Sunday: ‘Sometimes I Just Want To Scream’ After enduring years of posturing on Iraq by Fox’s Brit Hume and the National Review’s Bill Kristol on the Fox News Sunday roundtable, Juan Williams reached his limit. This morning, Williams said, “Sometimes I just want to scream. You guys have been going on since this thing began.” Williams noted that Hume and Kristol “don’t give credit to people…who said from the start this is a mistake.” Instead, “now it’s everybody’s a surrender monkey or impatient or squeamish or weak.” Watch it: Transcript: WILLIAMS: Squishy, impatient, you know, they’ll be in the land of milk and honey? What do you imagine, an American administration is coming in, Republican or Democrat, after President Bush that’s just going to lay down and run away like scared little — HUME: It will not be phrased that way. Listen, Juan, it’s very simple. WILLIAMS: This is really — sometimes i just want to scream. You guys have been going on since this thing began. I mean, you don’t give credit to people, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Barbara Lee, people who said from the start this is a mistake. You put them down. Now it’s everybody’s a surrender monkey or impatient or squeamish or weak. Why can’t you say, hey, there’s a real problem in Iraq?