marauderswr80

I read an article a while back, and Tiki Barber is the one who said this, but for a RB in the NFL playing one full game in the NFL is equal to 2 severe car accidents for a person. Now I can see why he retired.

Makes 2 of us......

I highly agree........ For some odd reason, Steve Smith reminds me alot of Lee Evans in college. They are about the same build. They play very similar........ I just have a feeling hes gone in the 2nd. Dont know why, but someone thats a pass happy offense will take him! But, I do agree with YOOOOOOOOu

Noway Buffalo trades up and gives away picks in doing so, when they can get a decent RB with the 12th pick or even 2nd & 3rd rounds. I do see Buffalo trading the 12th pick to someone else and moving down the boards and possibly getting a 2nd rounder or at least another 3rd rounder. Trading down and getting another pick in the top 100, is a logical thing to do with a team with many holes to fill. I mean, Thats 5 picks in the top 100. You fill alot of needs that way! So with my theory, id like to trade down to obtain another 2nd rounder or early 3rd. Trading up and giving another draft pick to me dont make sense, especially when this draft is rich with many solid RB's. I do agree Adrian Peterson is a heck of a ball player. Thats not my argument. My argument is that giving away picks for a draft deep with RB's is not a smart thing to do. I guess I could understand doing it if Reggie Bush was in this draft but......hes not. Trade down get another pick within the first 3 rounds.......Thats smart!

I watch Saves by the Bell every morning before I go to work..........its always on TBS.

Stay away from Pirates of the Carribean........took my 3 year old on it cause he loves Pirates, and now wont sleep at night!

Briggs for Spikes.........absolutely.

Honestly if Buffalo knew how to sustain drives last year, they easily get 3 more wins if not 4! A good offense can help a mediocre defense. Same goes for a defense......

Good point

I can see a few teams trading up with us not just GB. I can tell you now that if Cleveland dont take Peterson, there is going to be alot of teams wanting to trade up to try and get him, so that could either help us or hurt us....more then likely help. But if GB trades up with another team before us to get Peterson, question becomes who wants to trade up with us at the 12th spot? I still keep looking at what the Bears have. They have the 31st pick I think and maybe the 35th overall, thats almost like having 2 first rounders. I could see Buffalo trading with them to get those 2 picks so the Bears could have a shot at Patrick Willis. Due to Briggs sitting out.

To me Everett didnt show anything cause he was not used to his strengths and thats getting downfield. Reason being Royal was always in there. I remember Everett when he was in college constantly getting downfield for his offense and making big plays. I really do think with a new and improved OL, we see more from him and Royal both. I do think the "SUCK's" comment was a little too harsh due to the fact Everett has not had the chance to showcase his abilities since the OL desperately needed help. And we can all agree Everett is NOT a blocking TE like Royal is......

Nice reply.....Thanks....

Lately I have been sitting here going back and forth about our TE's......... With an new OL, do you expect Royal & Everett to become more of a passing threat for JP and the offense? Last year when the OL started to half way decent I think Royal was used more in the passing game instead of the run blocking scheme. From what I have heard, Everett is more of a passing catching TE downfield, but was rarely used last year due to the OL being pretty bad. Now with the OL being revamped does Everett become more involved with the offense and the same goes for Royal? I think we might see a little more production from that position...... Wait and see I guess.....Thoughts?

Didnt think of it that way.......Thats a great point man!

Take a RB in round 2 please......Thanks.

I dont know man im a fan of the old school uni's myself..... Browns, Steelers, Raiders, Colts......... The one teams I cant stand looking at is the Chiefs...they are old school, but they are just ugly!

Only reason I see Buffalo staying away from DT is cause they still dont know what they have in McCargo....

Does character issues come to mind anyone? I thought thats what the Bills preach?

That would be a devistating move for the Bills franchise and it would create alot of problems with its fan base. FIRST..........you dont trade away 3 picks for one pick when you have MANY holes to fill! Thats just idiotic! Id certainly hope Buffalo's front office is not that dumb to make that move! Trading down a few spots and maybe get another 2nd rounder is the best option for a team with more holes then swiss cheese!

It wasnt that long ago when Losman was in that same position! Think before you speak!

just show him the #'s of both WR's and end the debate! Really its not that difficult! Didnt Curtis have Isaac Bruce & Tory Holt with him on the field? Evans had......Price.....and still put up better #'s!

If you can find the right team to trade down with you might be able to get another second rounder. The one team I keep looking at is the Bears. With the problems they are having with Briggs, I can really see them as a major trade partner if Patrick Willis is there when we pick at #12. If I can recall, the Bears have 2 picks within the top 36? Thats one team id be willing to trade the 12th to for both those picks. Those are quality picks the Bears have and we could really improve our team if we swung a deal with them. id love to have 2 2nd round picks and 2 3rd round picks for this draft. With many holes to fill the Bears to me are the best fit to make a trade with.

He gained more yards with that cart then Willis did his entire career.......

Stop making sense around here you might get banned!

Id like Buffalo to use the throwbacks and add the white uni to it....