-
Posts
16,157 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by reddogblitz
-
-
On 8/4/2025 at 2:31 PM, Big Blitz said:
What state does NOT have congressional districts like this?
-
1 hour ago, Homelander said:
Hitler didn’t start with death camps; he started with propaganda, dehumanization, and institutional capture.
Actually this is in large part not true. Maybe not "death camps", but he did arrest his political rivals (communists , some jews, and socialists) and put them in new jails he set up. Many were tortured and killed. All in the first 6 months. And then of course 400 more political rivals were shot and killed including some their family in the Night of the Long Knives in July 1934.
I'll give you the vermin thing I guess, but I still think scale means a lot. Let me know when "TRUMP" illegally orders to kill anyone. Hitler also liked dogs but "TRUMP" does not.
-
9 minutes ago, stevestojan said:
The move to the minimum security facility is a brutal look based on the crime she was convicted of.
She was already in a low security prison. Based on what she was convicted of how was she not in Sing Sing or a comparable place?
-
3 hours ago, Homelander said:
I am presently reading Richard J Evans trilogy on Hitler and the 3rd reich. Presently I'm in book 2 The Third Reich In Power. Hitler wouldn't muse about maybe arresting a political rival. He would have had the SS round them up and take them into the forest and shoot them.
I know you and others like to compare "TRUMP" and Hitler. While they may have some traits in common like being great public speakers who can work a crowd. Or their high level of narcissism. You can say immigrants and Jews but it's really not the same. The scale of violence and ruling as a dictator is really not comparable.
-
12 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:
But EPSTEIN!!!!!!
This sounds just like lefties do when "TRUMP" does something they feel is worse than what Hillary did say "but her e-mails".
As a person with zero allegiance to either party, I'd like to see them both looked into and let the chips fall where they may. 2 things can he true. A conspiracy by Brennan and Stretch etc happened AND "TRUMP" was in some way involved or had know of an under age sex ring.
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Wolfgang said:
I'm touchy because you and others are morons...
You really should get out more if people expressing their opinion on an opinion board makes you touchy. Go outside. Touch some grass. I can assure you I am doing just fine.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Wolfgang said:
I answered dumba$$...
I care enough to lobby my representatives about it...
Have you called or written letters to your representatives demanding the truth?
If not, why not?
Posting self-righteousness on the Epstein files is meaningless if you haven't bothered to contact your reps even once...
Yeah, have a good one...
A little touchy I see. My rep has been notified and is on the case.
I see you really don't want to share your opinion on it on an opinion board for some reason. Ok. Have a nice day and Go BILLS
-
7 hours ago, Wolfgang said:
Not answering I see. No surprise there. Have a good one.
-
10 hours ago, Wolfgang said:
You are brain dead if you can't figure it out...
Bill went to Epstein's Island many many times...
How many times did Trump go to the Island?
The answer is zero...
Hopefully that helps you, although you are likely incapable of processing that...
Oh I get that. Not sure what difference it makes. Traveling to the island in and of itself is not a crime, so proves nothing. We also know Epstein and Maxwell pulled their crimes in other locations. Do you dispute that?
And again, Clinton is/was a scum bag too. Changes nothing in regards to any alleged culpability of "TRUMP".
Would you be in favor of releasing the files and letting the chips fall where they may? Clinton/Dershowitz/Gates/" TRUMP"/Prince Andrew/Staley/Brunel/Bill Richardson/Michael Jackson? If not why not?
Lucky for you we know that will never happen. There's big wigs Rs and Ds so they can agree on burying it. Just like they did Heidi Fleiss' client list. Some things never change.
Let it out. Why protect child rapists (if that indeed is what was going on)?
-
3 hours ago, Wolfgang said:
What exactly does this have to do with anything? Please explain.
President Clinton was about as big a scum bag as there is. But what in heaven's name does it have to do with "TRUMP"? Is it possible they are both scum bags? And only one of them has the power NOW. Try to keep up.
I believe your post is what @stevestojanwas posting about. Thanks for providing a good example 🙂
-
10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Go to a dance studio, take some lessons and dance with confident, athletic, musical young women or beginners like you.. there are are mixers/parties where there are almost always more women than men and they rarely say no when asked to dance, especially if you have a little skill. I would suggest salsa or swing. Then you're ready for bars with bands, even cruise ships and more formal events. I've posted this before but it warrants repeating. You'll thank me later.
I would concur with this advice. Never tried salsa. Did swing a little bit. But what I liked to do was C&W 2 step. Like you said there are always more women willing to dance than there are men there. Dance clubs will have lessons for free and it's not all that hard. And, you get to touch the women. And talk to them. I dated several women I met this way back in my day.
A couple of weeks ago I was riding .my bike through my suburban downtown which has the street blocked off. They were having C&W dance lessons. On the way out they were doing line dancing. On the way back they were doing a 2 step kind of thing. More men than women for sure. Everyone was having a good time. I stopped and watched for a few minutes. Looked like a lot of fun. I was jealous.
Go for it.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Homelander said:
Waste, fraud, and abuse.
Seriously, can someone, anyone justify this expense when allegedly we are trying to cut waste? Anyone?
-
24 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Oh well, maybe next president?
I certainly hope so.
-
3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
It was a hypothetical. I suspect most people would have been quite pleased.
That's nice. But we'll never know since Bush couldn't pull it off. He got his war. He should just be happy with that.
-
24 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Because Trump is clearly your daddy.
I don't know, maybe it's just me. But I have 3 words to describe the American people paying a billion dollars to fix up a "free" 747 that President Trump will take with him and they are ... wait for it ... WASTE, FRAUD, and ABUSE.
Too bad we don't have a President that would stop all that.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, JDHillFan said:
Where would social security be today had Bush been able to make it happen?
I don't know because Bush couldn't make it happen.
-
-
Not so sure some of this is not exaggerated. Getting your first house was never easy or at least hadn't been in the last 45 Years or so. When I bought my first house on 1986, interest rates were 11.5%. Sure prices were lower, but the payments were high due to interest rates.
I know several young people who have been able to buy a house in the last few years. They had to save up and work hard and maybe live further out, but they did it.
Or, if they were to join the military for 3 years, when they get out they could buy a house with 1% down and a lower interest rate. Worked for me.
-
3
-
-
13 minutes ago, T master said:
Well mine has went up well over $100 a month since Biden put in pace "The Green New Deal" and the price of batteries for my Dewalt drills and such have went from what were $60 to now be $150 and you have to buy the battery now separate from the tool when you use to get at least 1 battery with the tool .
Oh and I bet all of the Pilot & Loves truck stops that I stop at now that have EV charging stations bigger than most of the fuel islands on the car side has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of electricity going up seeing as the electrical grid has to be completely upgraded because of the added draw .
Oh and then all the new housing that is going up that has to have a bigger electrical service built into the house so they can charge their EV's which has driven the cost of Electrical things such as wire up . I remember just say 7 years ago when a 100' role of 12/ 2 with ground was like $70 and now it's near $175 .
But yah it's all because of Trump when all this BS was put in place before he was ever elected .
So go peddle your boat load of BS to someone that will stand and listen to it because your so FOS that it's all his fault I had to put on my hip waders just to reply to your post ...
B**L S**T !!!
Yes it is. Deal with it.
If not, where does the buck stop?
-
1
-
-
On 7/27/2025 at 8:05 AM, Orlando Buffalo said:
Truly curious why the cops doesn't simply run him into the wall at the begining when no one is around, once they got around other cars the danger skyrocketed to innocent people
I guess they didn't have a grappler ...
-
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:
We know. They know it to.
I'm not saying you're wrong but if that's all there is why not release the stuff? But if he did and you are right it would be a big win and huge black eye for democrats. They'd look silly and dishonest. Not that that would be the first time or anything though.
-
13 hours ago, dgrochester55 said:
I agree with both points. Adding to that, one topic that I have rarely seen come up anywhere is the amount of energy that a generative AI search burns compared to a normal one. The amount is exponentially more. Despite that Google has made it their default and there is no option to opt-out, or uniform easy way to disable it. Why should I only turn my AC to 79 degrees, stop eating meat while paying more money for hyper processed "plant based" alternatives and buy a twice as expensive electric car with no resale value when used and a battery that is damaging to the environment when Big Tech just made something that burns that much energy a default? We can certainly make individual changes because we think that it is the right thing to do, but forcing intrusive, expensive and impractical lifestyles on regular people while those on top did not follow suit was never the answer.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-do-googles-ai-answers-cost-the-environment/
https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117
https://www.androidauthority.com/how-to-turn-off-ai-overviews-google-3445771/
There was an article in the Seattle Times today about how Kids can solve easy abstract and reasoning puzzles. Spoiler alert - the kids were much better both in solving the puzzle and explaining how.
QuoteUniversity of Washington researchers developed the game AI Puzzlers to show kids an area where AI systems still typically and blatantly fail: solving certain reasoning puzzles. In the game, users get a chance to solve ‘ARC’ puzzles (short for Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) by completing patterns of colored blocks. They can then ask various AI chatbots to solve the puzzles and have the systems explain their solutions — which they nearly always fail to do accurately. The team tested the game with two groups of kids. They found the kids learned to think critically about AI responses and discovered ways to nudge the systems toward better answers.
https://www.washington.edu/news/2025/07/01/this-puzzle-game-shows-kids-how-theyre-smarter-than-ai/
You can try it yourself here: https://www.ai-puzzlers.com/
-
1
-
-
37 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
Ya, it leads back to Big Oil which can care less about saving the planet from the existential threat of climate change
Maybe they're both to blame. Problems can and often have multiple causes.
-
On 7/24/2025 at 4:28 AM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I know this is a hot button issue for you, Red, and I can certainly appreciate that.
The Jet use/cost is a fair argument, as is the use of Zoom to eliminate cost. I have no idea what other scheduled meetings or travel coincided with that trip, the importance of the trip etc, but let’s assume you’re right—it was a 1.5 hour business trip that could have been handled with a phone call. Fair criticism. We each decide where it falls in our outrage meter and vote accordingly.
The carbon footprint hypocrisy is aligned with the other side, not this one.
I too believe there is a lot hype and BS of the leftys take on some of this. Personally I'm really tired of hearing what all we local schmucks must do to save the planet. I do my part by recycling, driving a 13 year old car with less than 40,000 miles on it which has polluted less in 13 years than all those people in their new electric cars, etc. Meanwhile those with the bucks and power do stuff like flying cross country on taxpayers dime for a 90 minute meeting, or 1/2 way across the world to attend Hunter's trial or The Blue Angels coming to town dumping 600 tons of carbon or Building massive data centers polluting out the wazoo. So why bother?
That was a minor point of my post. The $200,000 per hour is only to fly the airplane (how is the refurbishing big beautiful airplane going?). There's also the cost of bringing the secret service and the beast and all their other paraphanalia. President Trump's big campaign pledge was to stop fraud, waste, and abuse for every else except him and his staff I guess.
-
3
-
1
-


Democrats Flee Texas To Stop Extreme Gerrymandering
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Texas also has the most renewable energy too. You should like that I would think. 1st in wind. 2nd in solar. 2nd in battery storage.
https://environmentamerica.org/texas/media-center/new-analysis-texas-continues-dominance-in-wind-and-solar-power-generation/
But in regards to gerrymandering, both parties are united in their hypocrisy on the issue. Either one would and have done it when they can and would do it again tomorrow if they can.