Yes. Basically your argument boils down to how you feel people should behave, and then basing their rights off of your feelings.
You're a dipshit. But at least you're good at it.
So you agree with Roberts, in that it's ok to ignore both the intent and the language of a bill that's passed, in order to replace it from the bench with something different that they feel will work instead?
You should watch different chats.
50% of all jobs today won't exist in 10 years?
If we even started dropping jobs and subsequently employment anywhere near that pace, the economy would **** itself so badly that the companies installing automation would be out of business.
I could have sworn we just passed a flawed system because doing something, even if it had obvious flaws, was better than doing nothing.
Why's this time so different?