Hazed and Amuzed

Thank you, that is what impressed me the most. His hands are MUCH better then Kelly's from what I've seen. Sorry Dwight I just don't think Kelly is beetter then Thomas based on what I've seen. I completely agree with you on this point Kelly, In fact I really don't see why people are in love with Kelly. Just because he's tall maybe? I don't know but Thomas looks like the real deal to me. Kelly on the other hand looks good but not #11 good.

Devin Thomas' highlights http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHbkz0IMIeA At 2:10 I became very impressed. He looks like a much better prospect then Kelly and if he can be gotten later in the first then I'd grab him up.

Harvey / Sweed

It's very possible but I don't think it goes with our style of offense. Also I'm not saying we don't need another WR, I just don't think risking the #11 on him is worth it.

Common sense? This is TSW, right?

Maybe I didn't get the point across well enough. My bad if it's my lack of writing skills. Here is what I'm saying: I think that taking a WR with the 11THpick is too much of a risk due to our offensive style and future plans with Lee, though if picking up an extra pick or 2 is in the cards the risk is much less IMO and a WR in the 1st should be okay. Also if we are picking up a guy with the 11TH pick who can be gotten with a later pick it can be considered a reach, something I don't think is a luxury for us to do.

In a trade down scenario this doesn't make sense? If Kelly, Sweed and Hardy are all similar in skill set and ranking and we have the chance to pick up an extra 2nd while getting one of them, you don't understand that line of thought? Okay then sorry I must be a moron. Using the #11 on a position that will touch the ball 50-60 times a year at the receiver position also seems dumb to me, but then again I am a moron. It's the same argument that goes for drafting a shutdown cb with the 11. Shutdown CB's are not as important in our scheme as the rest of our D. #2 WR's aren't as important in our offensive gameplan therefore it almost seems like a waste (see the Lions and Jags) to pick another first round WR.

You never fail to crack me up BB. BTW who's the wannabe spiderman in your avatar?

I've had coke white but thats a different story.

There he is... I GOT'EM, EVERYONE. I found Bryant Johnson. He was under the sofa. That sneek... We can all relax now

Pepsi in a can and plastic bottle. Coke in a glass bottle or fountain.

:lol: Very happy for you Campy. I'll have a drink to that.

Somebody better find'em. I just had to..

I was going to say you were a better person for not knowing but ap has explained it now making you one of us. Gooble Goble

When I said tha WR wasn't the biggest need I meant that as far as our offense goes, it's a run first type system that focuses on controlling the ball. Two first round receivers is just too much invested in an area that doesn't seem to be a focus point for us. We're not going to win a lot games through the air IMO with or without a first round WR. I agree that we need a true #2 WR but using the #11 pick on it seems irresponsible

I've read a few posters claiming Kelly is the safe bet at 11. Why do people seem to think Malcom Kelly is a safe bet at all much less a safe bet at 11? His highlight reel is good but I wouldn't look at it and say he's a safe bet. There is not that big a difference in the top 3-4 WR's this year yet everyone has us getting Kelly @ 11 and the rest of the field(not Jackson since he should be off of our radar) comes off the board in the mid 20's. Thats a bit strange, in fact it sounds like a reach. If we trade down and grab one of these guys then I'd be okay with that but If we draft Kelly at 11 I think it might be in prelude to letting Evans walk. I don't see the Buffalo Bills, who are a defensive, run first type club having two high priced guys at WR. If Kelly really is the man then we'll have a tough situation in 3 years. Financially keeping him and Evans is going to be hard. I just don't think a #2 receiver is that important that we should use the 11th pick. We drafted Evans at 11 and he's our #1 guy, does it really make sense to get a second receiver at the same position? especially one that is rated lower then Evans was. WR is a need but on this team I don't think WR is as important as some would like to think.

I can't seem to change my name back to WPBbuffalo, It's sticking me with my old name.

I thought this was funny...http://thefoamfinger.blogspot.com/2006/09/hour-in-life-john-clayton_20.html

Shows how important we are.

Nah we ain't fighting in fact I feel bad that this thread has been hijacked. We're completely cool I just like standing up for the little guy sometimes.

I HAVE been comming here for that long and I don't think I insulted anyone. It just sucks that when new people come in their posts are usually ignored or disregarded due to not having a high post count. I am not complaining for myself because I could care less if anyone responds to my posts but when I see someones opinion put aside due to their lack of post count it just sucks.

I love this menalilty, I've been coming to this board for 7 years but have few posts and that is why. Unless your post count is in the hundreds or thousands you simply don't rate around here. Maybe I'll join under a different name post a thousand times about pointless things and then people will respect my posts around here too.

Metallica. I like metal and these guys are not metal just posers whose every song sounds the same.

I work at the Ale house on Palm beach lakes blvd. we have the bills game every week!!