Jump to content

Hazed and Amuzed

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hazed and Amuzed

  1. I am starting to really like Barnes. I was one of the peeps that wanted Schmitt. I seem to stand corrected.
  2. What should be really interesting to see is how Turk will call the game with leads during the regular season. Will he be conservative with the lead or does he let them play?
  3. So? Put an Effing cast on it and send him the hell back out there.
  4. Preseason or not. THAT WAS ONE OF THE MOST IMPRESSIVE DRIVES I HAVE SEEN FROM THE BILLS IN YEARS. I just hope and pray that Turk calls games like this in the regular season.
  5. I thought Foley was God. I read it on a sign on the telervision.
  6. That's great but I like this one too http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4MqWzO_L8k...feature=related
  7. I thought you were talking about The Big Lebowski because it's clearly the coolest movie ever.
  8. Yeah don't even get me started on that subject. lol We got one f'd up country.
  9. Have you ever watched every part to Zeitgeist? I think it might interest you. It covers everything from religion to the federal reserve. Very interesting movie. I know it gave me a few different perspectives on things. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeZB2EsPqGE...feature=related
  10. Look we can all throw Youtube video's on here to prove our points for us but that doesn't require much thinking about what each other is saying does it? Instead of putting a link up to refute my responses think about what I'm saying and process it yourself. Hell, can find a video or Wiki link to prove any view I want. The people in those video's or the people who write wikipedia are not the end all be all. We need to lear to think for ourselves. I love the educational video's on youtube but I only use them to get different perspectives and therefore amend my thoughts based on wether or not it makes sense to me.
  11. But you're looking at it wrong. It's not that people are just filling in the gaps. There are 2 sides to this coin and each side can say that the other is filling in gaps. So that is not an argument I think that will accomplish anything. The way I see it is that science provides more evidence but CAN NOT PROVE the base theory of the argument against God which is "Where did life come from?" and since science declares that everything can be proven how can it justify this argument? This is the same dilemma that creationism is in. I can give you a million different theories about God but I can't prove any base to it. This is why you can not convince someone who believes in one about the other. Each have their gaps. I do however think your problem is with the church and not God. I may be wrong. Your posts seem angry at those who believe in God. You seem just as unwilling to believe there might be a God as people with faith do that there is one. I will say this though, I enjoy this conversation with you. You seem to know what you're talking about and that's refreshing.
×
×
  • Create New...