The Big Cat

Watch out for this badass, folks.

You're right. I agree with you 100%. Great. Now you don't have to waste your time anymore!

The evidence you provided was wildly slanted and dubious, at best.

It's a non-starter with you and company. Again, your word choice is alarming. You've already convinced yourself of all of this.

Easily. I'll happily show you what 'easily' doesn't look like. But I won't bother, I don't foresee you or any other crusaders on the Rex Death March being even remotely rational about any of this.

Meh. Three of the teams ranked 20-32 made the playoffs, and the other two were from the league's two worst divisions (AFCS/NFCE) I'm pretty confident your outlier disproves nothing. Also, it was intended to highlight that our offense wasn't really that good. And as far as the "team" game goes, it's a stat that has direct bearing on the defense.

Thank you. By why this is needed to be said, I'll never know.

Thanks

No.

Whatever you say.

Or not have three and outs at a higher rate than every team but the one bad enough to earn the first overall pick.

Nobody's talking about conversion rate.

And while he surely does, he hasn't exactly had the QB bullpen to be anything else (to Yolo's point)

It also had some serious stinkers that ultimately cost the team a victory: NYG, PHI and the second half of KC come to mind. Lest we forget that before TT pulled one from where the sun don't shine, the offense had accumulated 57 total yards through more than 2 and a half quarters against Tennessee. I know everyone wants to burn RR at the stake and all, but the offense sure did their part to put a damper on things with their 31st ranked three and out percentage.

You would know.

Oh, and also, if Bell had stayed healthy, OP's argument goes right out the window since they probably wouldn't have needed the Bills win to eek in since the offense would have run through him. Also, they won three games with their starting QB on the sidelines...so... Which games and how did his 'ineptness' result in a loss?

I have serious doubts that Pot Roast will come significantly cheaper than Snacks.

Such as?

My "thing?" I criticize ideas, not people. I will however question the motive behind burning calories on something that makes you miserable.

I can't understand why Vic's article has summoned now-123 responses. It tells us virtually nothing we didn't already know, and like many of his since-debunked gotcha moments, it comes entirely from anonymous sources. CONCLUSION: people who signed up for this website will cling to any/all variables to justify their wanton desire for Rex Ryan to be thought of as a failure. That's nice.

Vic has been consistently willing to follow misleading sources since he arrived back in Buffao.

Not coastal. Lots of land. There are massive swaths of abandoned lots on the South Side. Vertical living is confined to the lake shore and downtown. Dunno.

No, it's Chicago pricing. It's how it's always been. It's consistently been a fraction of the cost of comparable cities in the U.S.

Don't confuse it with places like NYC, DC or SF.

shame, i used to work about 600 feet from this monstrosity: http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2015/01/27/chicago-bear-matt-forte-paid-over-4m-for-this-humongous-river-north-mansion.php