The Big Cat

You know nothing about sadness.

The line between legal and illegal is pretty clear, actually. But you've demonstrated a fundamental inability to understand that. So, see ya.

Orchestrated the moon landing, exactly.

Well that would be encouraging something bushl eague and illegal. Targeting a player's shoulder during the act of tackling is not. Why are you still here?

Because he's never seen it. Same reason I got my doubts about the "Pyramids."

Spoiler alert: you shouldn't be

It's Pats week, baby, the gloves are OFF!

Then GTFO our message board if we're such wandering cretins. Seems like you know a good deal about tools. How bout you go stick yours in a wall socket. GO BILLS (I don't care if this post gets me banned)

And what you don't seem to understand about this is that--as fans--we'd hope for this just like we'd hope for increased targets for Sammy. Because--as has been explained to you going on dozens of times now--targeting an opponent's injury, like getting the ball in the hands of your playmakers, is a tactic.

Bro. You said you don't understand the thinking behind going out and trying to rehurt somebody. It's been thoroughly explained. And what you said was clear as day: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/188623-garoppolo-hurt/?p=4064407

It's not stupid. It's tactical. Albeit highly illegal. But you're in la la land if you don't think players know where their opponents are hurt and target them there any way they can. And to clarify: it's highly illegal for coaches to explicitly tell their players to do this. Or so Greggo's scandal led us to believe.

Neither are shoulder injuries.

Hurting people is a major strategic component of that game. It's why your first string RB leads with the crown of his helmet wherever he runs.

I'm confused. Are you calling OP a liar?

You--the person calling others stupid, reckless mouth-breathers--has the audacity to criticize another's discourse?

Well you don't report to a guy like him (or may be you do, HA!), but literally zero players that play or have played for him think he's a joke, and virtually all of them have the opposite impression from what you've illustrated above. So aside from your fantasy scenario, exactly what is the negative consequence? As for the words he chooses: **NEWSFLASH** the Buffalo Bills are an entertainment organization. Let's not lose sight of that, shall we, Francis?

He's obligated to speak to the media.

Thanks! I shall wonder no more!

3rd ranked defense on PFF. Just sayin. https://twitter.com/cover1eturner/status/780490728132796418

Eegads. So they got the atrociously inconsistent rule right. At least.

Yeah. Exactly. Fans begging for him to shut up: to what end? For what purpose? What is the negative outcome you seek to avoid?

So you agree! The defense is good twice as often as it is bad!!

Cardinals started with five straight three and outs and finished with four straight picks thrown. Not dominant? C'mon.

Which narrative? I'm guessing you didn't detect the 50 pound tongue lodged into the cheek of all these Schwartz posts. It's been three games. Nobody here is that dumb.

If it were a WR, it would have been a TD, given the catch rule, right? So..? He was not touched.