The Big Cat

More than professional athletes. Turns out when you're world class talent, you don't get paid "hourly."

Right. [Their data] = real. [The data they use to arrive at [their real data]] = fake.

1-3, yet still considered in the top-half of the league. Sounds about right.

You've stated this several times, and while I'm mostly inclined to agree with on just about all other topics, I don't understand why you're so willing to sacrifice a division/conference game...

Seem my questions above. Seriously. WHY would the "MSM" (what the !@#$ does that even mean anymore, btw?) try to get Obama elected? Seriously. What's in it for them? I'm dying to know.

Jesus. "That's the media's goal." To what end? Why/how are they incentivized to this? Have you ever worked in the "media?" Didn't think so. Forget the end, how bout the means? Are their morning editorial meetings screw-Romney brainstorms? Is the NYT on the horn with the Chicago Sun-Times and the Washington Post to make sure they get their "facts" right? Every last person to work for a news outlet is brainwashed into compliance? Not one of them has ever left the profession because of the pressures bestowed from the powers-that-be to force a "liberal agenda?" Where are the tell-alls? How is it that only the people on the outside of the media have this knowledge? And why isn't anyone doing anything about it?

Boy, for being a bunch of fawning idiots, the lamestream media sure is cunning and calculated.

Yeah, wow. I botched that pretty badly--oh, the dangers of multi-tasking. FL: Change between 04 and 08 = +7 for Dems, and +6 is forecasted change this time around. (-1 difference in change) OH: Change between 04 and 08 = +13 for Dems, and +1 is forecasted change this time around. (-12 difference in change) PA: Change between 04 and 08 = +4 for Dems, and +2 is forecasted change this time around. (-2 difference in change)

Thought the same thing!

So the 2012 forecasts are wrong because they don't match the 2004/2008 results? WTF? But a different way, the polls actually confirm, and even mitigate the trend these very numbers show. FL 2004-2008 +7 for the Dems, and +2 forecasted for this cycle's increase. OH 2004-2008 +13 for the Dems, and +1 forecasted for this cycle's increase PA 2004-2008 +4 for the Dems, and +2 forecasted for this cycle's increase.

Hahaha, I can't rationalize or even center my thoughts, but mine are the exact same!

I know a lot of guys here aren't on Twitter, but with our younger players using the service more and more, fun things like this pop up. So, I'm passing it along for you enjoyment. GO BILLS! http://twitter.com/teambryanscott/status/250991410097037313/photo/1

I think Obama will win Florida and Ohio, which will give him more than enough electoral votes. I also think he'll take Colorado and New Hampshire, and then after that, it will just be piling-on.

Apologies to our Northerly neighbors, kind sir.

Whoa. Since that is such an egregious reversal of conventional wisdom, I must request either a link or, at the very least, a detailed explanation.

It's entirely fair to say that any extreme circumstance between now and election day could play a role. I will say, though, that I don't think the 2010 numbers are relevant to a presidential election, especially in the realm of turnout forecasts.

+ = TSW

Deep breath, Bills fans. We'll get some info after today's practice. I know it's an agonizing several hours away, but I promise you (unless you live outside the continental US), before you go to bed tonight, you'll know something--which is more than we know now.

On November 7, I will gladly acknowledge how right you were in all your [ludicrous] forecasts and how wrong I was. Would you do the same?

Wow. A right wing publication debunks a poll that says Obama is winning. I have to sit down, the room is spinning.

Deservant. Interesting.

Yeah, okay.

Because: A.) America is stupid B.) He's actually not that bad of a president C.) Mitt Romney is a TERRIBLE candidate D.) Polls are biased. YOU MUST CHOOSE

There, he said it.