The Big Cat

So what happens when the Bills don't draft a QB? Collective head explodes? Protests? Boycotts? Business as usual?

I think it's more likely they just let their picks come and go. They're holding all the cards. Why would they start divvying up resources for the mutual benefit of others when they could just let them go to waste and make the exact same incremental gain?

I really like our coach's attitude, and that he plays everything so close to the vest. That said, I really don't like Tim Graham. His writing is sardonic, his twitter feed is pompous, and we all got a front row seat to his TBD hissy fit a few years ago. Guy is an ass.

Thanks? Manuel will NOT be there in the second. I will wager that right now.

Calling it now: The Office will wrap up its series with a Jim/Pam divorce. That's the only thing left to salvage the shreds of credibility it clings to now.

Yeah, unlike past years when there was consensus across the board!!

We are friends.

Cue: WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THESE "PROS" WILL MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE THIS TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?????!!?!?!?!?!??!

I go five: Smith, Barkley, Manuel, Nassib, Dysert (in that order)

THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING. (and that includes you, Mr. Duckbill in the black v-neck who takes one to the face and only retaliates AFTER the guy is laid out)

I really just want to go to sleep and wake up tomorrow, five weeks later.

Yeah, and my frustration/confusion was aimed at Nix, not you, obvi.

Holy Christ, I hope that's not his methodology because 2010, 2009 and 2007 did NOT wield "two starters." So I'm not certain what data he's basing this on... unless the last two years a body of evidence makes??

Explain faith? Okay

Yep. Totally unnecessary. And didn't Buddy say there are TWO quarterbacks to build a franchise around??

LOL @ the name change for the thread.

The question isn't whether Hassle is better than Fitz or good enough to tutor incoming rookies. The question is: is he better than Tavaris Jackson? Answer: YES

F5 CHRIS MORTENSEN: Teams interested in Matt Hasselbeck: AZ, Buff, Chi, Cin, Cleve, Indy, NO, NYG, SF & Tampa,...and list could grow.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand this is the most exciting thing to happen for six days in Bills Nation.

It was my parents' money. And that's a fine approach, except there's a difference between manipulating for manipulation's sake or manipulating with an endgame in mind. The latter I can tolerate.

I think he has the best mechanics of the bunch. Just my $0.02, but if you've been hucking a ball at a high level for 15 years (as just about every NFL QB prospect has), mechanics can and will be the deciding factor.

Not even close. The season 2 finale was BAD. And when I say bad I mean: characters you don't want to succeed do, there are glaring plot holes and whatever Lena's agenda is that jives with what Ryan wrote above got tired ten episodes ago. The show wants to be gritty and real, but the sexual range of Dunham's character sucks you RIGHT out of the realism. The show is supposed to be funny, but it's not. The main characters are DEPLORABLE, all of them, and watching them succeed is exhausting. No, it's not "good." I'm going to play a card knowing it could get me in trouble around here. This show sucks for the same reason LOST sucked--because ambiguity is NOT a plausible premise. It should not be the foundation around which all the drama revolves. It's manipulative and as far as writing goes, it's a cop out. There is plenty of "good" programming, "good" music, "good" films, "good" everything that I don't like. GIRLS is not "good."

Ha, no I'm implying that his offspring are 20-30 years old.

I hate to disagree because I obviously share your sentiment. But who begat who: Brady/Bellicheat. It's a chicken/egg argument we'll never reach a consensus on. I'm firmly of the belief that Bellicheat made Brady. Very interesting. What was the rub with Wanny? His "kids" would sit by us at the Bills bar out here...

Very nicely said.