The Big Cat

Get a life, loser.

Oh, horse hockey. Sullivan's been grand fathered into a dying fraternity. His credibility is measured only in years served. Nobody under the age of 40 in 2017 could be as vapid/employed as him. He started writing his column for tomorrow before halftime: https://twitter.com/ByJerrySullivan/status/906945581213470726 Why? Because he can. Because in his age demo, there still exists enough bags of stale farts to keep his dreadfully predictable content marketable to ad buyers. I'm looking at some of you. A lot of you. Most of you.

No

If Sully was like a tenth as smart as he thinks he is... Dude has never said ANYTHING thought provoking, ever.

Each of your posts in this thread is a snarky half-point. Not sure you're in a position to crown yourself discourse king. correct. their failures to build a winner resulted in their terminations.

then count me among those who don't believe it's a "done deal" so long as the owner and coach aren't in the loop

because having knowledge of a trade's possibility and having a trade finalized are two completely different things.

Why would he be pissed? Are the Bills planning to run less now that Sammy is gone? I guess that logic makes sense since the receiver they brought in has been more productive.

no

No

Oh sweet christ.

LOL

My intolerance of refugees is a disgrace to my Swedish heritage. The postmortem bb.com deluge was just too much.

I'm guessing at this point you have an Amazon subscription service to replace you control, C and V keys...what? Monthly? Wait. You do know what Amazon is, right?

You have serious/legitimate identity issues.

Comey explained why he cleared the room. It was literally one of the first things in his testimony. Looking forward to DT's explanation. The rest of your questions are leading and nonsensical, quite frankly. No reason to guess. That's literally what he said.

Well, for starters he didn't do what she asked.

CORRECT. He said that exchange was on May 16, the date of the article I shared. Bat **** Rhino insists that the exchange took place prior to that based on information NYT had, and thus Stretch committed perjury.

Making nothing from nothing is not spin. I'm not refuting the possibility that the NYT acquired the memo before the May 12 tweet. I'm questioning your inference that they got it directly from Comey, and thus he's guilty of perjury. I also never said you were a Trump supporter. That was another in an infinite series of inferences you've posited here. What I did point out is how cozy you get with information with implicates one side while ignoring/refuting/questioning/deriding information that implicates the other. You can call yourself whatever you want, at least be conscious of your behavior.

May be it did. But that doesn't mean they got the memo from Comey (your inference). It was a memo. Other people had access to it. The NYT piece says it was confirmed by two people. The memo wasn't Comey's personal diary otherwise kept locked and under his mattress. Your accusation of perjury here is wildly inconsistent with your apparent inability to infer anything from any other piece of information that has been brought to light in all of this. You have a keen willingness to infer the worst based on information that would implicate anyone/anything opposing Trump/GOP. Information implicating Trump/GOP, on the other hand, is evidently impossible for you to process without thick, impenetrable skepticism.

Um. No. So Comey was BOTH of the sources cited in that article? Whoa, this is scary!! Do you derive your powers of inference from your third eye or fourth?

lol wut? May 12: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/863007411132649473 May 16: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html

Let's also remember that the "leak" came after the president undermined the man and the entire institution (FBI) by calling its former leader a "nut case" in a [public] meeting with a foreign adversary. Tell me more about how this began with a Comey "leak."

He was already fired when he "leaked" it. Also, let's be very clear about "leak." Did he print the memo and mail it? FWD it to his gmail then send it to his friend? Read it aloud over the phone? Or did he call him up and give him the gist? Do you know enough about the ownership of "government property" to say which of these, if any, is more illegal/terminable than the others? If he was already fired when he "leaked" it, then presumably he wouldn't have access to the original copy unless he duplicated it. I think it stands to reason that he shared the content of the memo based on his own recollection. Which--if you listen to the full interview with the guy to whom he "leaked"--sounds as if it's the case. As if he was "given" the content from Comey in a very conversational way. As one would between friends. So...again. About that "leak?"