The Big Cat

For being so !@#$ing awesome, Chef.

Oh, I wasn't offended at all. I take no ownership of "Tuel Time," I was just brushed back by the notion I had stolen it. It's not exactly the world's most creative idea. I'm pretty sure it popped into the heads of about 70% of mostly-sober Bills fans...

Nonstop, I'm sure. It took those lowlifes less than 48 hours to have the Leathers video in the can.

If her daddy didn't have the most annoying song of 1992, her mug would have stopped her "career" dead in its tracks...years ago.

Yes, the point be made!

http://goo.gl/QPdHQQ

So my question is: how will they rearrange the seating? makes no sense for everyone to face forward, right? Or will safety implications trump all? But the self-driving car should eliminate most safety concerns anyways, right?

The Chinese!

It's not my fault.

That makes it no more relevant to a conversation about QB's in 2013.

Grand theft auto, February '94. Where apparently you defended yourself and had the case thrown out by citing Free Property Rights of Horse and Carriage from 1798. MORE POWER!

Notice I didn't say that college success is a guarantee for professional success. Rather, the point was that failing to win in college (as was the case for Tuel and Edwards) doesn't bode well for NFL success. So, your Tebow argument is irrelevant, Peyton has played precisely the way he has in the pros as he did in college, with a monkey on his back, thanks for making my point for me. Joe Flacco won at Delaware, and Aaron Rodgers won at Cal. Again, what was the point in bringing them up? And we're talking about QB's here, Keuchly doesn't belong in the conversation.

Well, if you want to split hairs about it, fine, you're right. I'm pretty sure you know what I meant, though.

I couldn't agree more about the relevance of college success--one of the reasons I was hopeful Buffalo would draft Dalton or R. Wilson, one of the reasons I was glad they drafted Manuel. That said--Buffalo didn't draft Tuel. They burned a third rounder on Edwards. Having Tuel be a viable option THIS YEAR was never the plan.

Totally agreed, except that unwillingness or incapability of adapting to new technology is a dying trend (probably a poor choice of words, but accurate none-the-less). And given the financial aspect from a delivery standpoint, the only thing keeping the status quo in tact is the knowledge that the people who buy the most pharmaceutical products aren't likely to change the way they consume content.

See, I don't know. I think my parents--classic Boomers--would love to access content the way I do, they just don't know technology well enough to know what's possible. The most important part of his speech was the bit about the hundreds of millions dumped into (read:wasted on) pilots. The industry won't change because of what people want. It'll change to affect its own bottom line.

How long before the death grip on content delivery starts to fade? It's happening now. Personally, I see an avalanche coming in the next five years. How it will start, I don't know, but Hulu, Netflix, HBOGo, tablets and smart TV's are an intriguing step in that direction. What's odd is that CBS has retained the highest ratings, basically by saying '!@#$ all that ****.' Who knows? We'll have to wait and see.

Color flip? Legit? Jesus. Everyone's a critic. The original:

Kraft and Hoodie both said they knew nothing, right? Perhaps the organization should be sued for criminal negligence.

Bully. QUITE RIGHT, INDEED!

Haha, okay, Miss Cranky pants. It's clear I've done humanity a disservice today. I definitely should have searched for Washington student projects after I had the idea. Which by the way came up immediately after Manuel was annouced "injured." I just didn't bother firing up ye olde photoshop until today. And what !@#$ing difference does it make whose idea it was? It took all of five minutes to photoshop the guy's name into the existing image. They had it before I did. They heard of the guy long before I did. What's your problem here?