The Big Cat

You tell me. You're the one with the burden of proof. And while you gather evidence, show me how many times it worked, how many times it didn't. Also, please demonstrate that it didn't work for both CJ and Freddy. Also, specific to that play, please show all post-game analysis that's contrary to all reports that our LG stunk up the place.

It's not a small business. Not a small company. Not a small brand (73 stores). Not a small store.

...and our quarterback was 11 when theirs took his first NFL snap... Which ones?

Your ability to dance around a point is stupifying.

SJ being the best offensive player is a very questionable claim. Anyone who's every played high level sports knows that the guy who's got his head in the clouds can't be counted on when the game is on the line. I get agitated when Stevie shows signs his head's not in the right spot, because he's also shown signs that he he can't be counted on when it matters. But heaven forbid this correlation keep rearing its ugly head again and again and again and again and fans like me are there to say wtf?

It's a subsidiary chain. Parent company did $34 Billion revenue in FY 2013. By comparison, Wegmans and their 83 stores and 44,000+ employees is a "small business."

Up until the last drive they did. 9/18. Pats* were 11/20 on the day.

Oh my yourself, Lt. Logic.

Again. Break it down. It comes out to 26 seconds. That's if you want to argue facts alone. Rather, what you're supporting is a play-not-to-lose strategy, at home, week one, against a division rival. No thanks.

Methinks this will be the responsibility of Moats, Alonso and Lawson. What's their record when he doesn't get 50 yards?

1.) The patriots were 11/20 on the third downs. Not great, not terrible either, especially considering how many damn plays the d had to play. 2.) What fun is it when you credit your opponent for beating you? 3.) !@#$ Tom Brady. I'm not sure you're asking. But it works out such that the Pats* would have taken over at 4:05 rather than 4:31.

This has been dissected in another thread. What you're asking for is an extra 26 seconds off the clock. Do you think that would have been the difference? Also, the players and coaches (rightly, IMO) approached that drive with scoring being the primary objective, NOT milking the clock. Given how they executed, however, even if the latter would have been the goal, it would have resulted in 26 less seconds for the Patriots. So I go back to the question above: do you still think that would have been a difference?

My crusade? Did he brag about being unstoppable? Yes. Did he then drop a very critical pass in the fourth quarter? Yes. How is this about me? Why can't you come to terms with him being idiotic? About talking the talk about not walking the walk? How is any of this my fantasy?

Right, because I'm the only person saying these things. Get a clue, man. I understand that makes your crusade easier, but there is a growing number of Bills fans who are fed up with his **** for the same reasons I am. Fact. Also: the order I listed causes is completely irrelevant.

Well, that's just like your opinion, man.

I haven't once insinuated that the drop was the sole purpose for the loss. Not once. In fact, in a poll I STARTED, I don't even rank it among the top three. Again, if you spent some time taking an objective view of the guy, rather than making up nonsense to argue with me about whether or not he's a bozo, you'd see that he is--in fact--a bozo. It aint about me.

Since Spiller is becoming a popular scapegoat (for lack of better term), I'd like to add that Marrone mentioned in his press conference that NE* was one of the best rush defenses last year. That's very true. Averaging 3.9 ypc allowed, they were sixth best in the NFL.

[furiously refreshes google trying to find kickstarter link]

No? Nothing else to add? Just going to keep apologizing for the guy every time he does something stupid? Just going to continue insinuating it's my fault every time he does something stupid? At least this waltz of the dumbtards is predictable.

Sports is entertainment. Sports "reporters" are entertainment "reporters." It's about eye balls. It's about money. Seriously, who cares? that should be the next fan-bought billboard.

Well, that and media-market population.

Looks like the Rook and his handling gets a pass so far.

Pick three!

Yeah, this one's a big stretch. Seriously, take the blinders off. The guy talks a big game, doesn't play one.

Turn the channel, bro.