-
Posts
17,855 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by The Big Cat
-
-
Actually it's a little chilly tonight......got any of them heat maps?
You mean the ones that reinforced everything some of us said 15 months ago which took others until September of this year to grasp?
No.
-
Bump. Just, you know, because.
Lame.
-
Incorrect......actually they've "averaged" just 6.5 wins per season over the last 17 years.......only 2 seasons over .500 and only 3 seasons AT .500.
But that's misleading because the last 11 seasons have been worse.........NINE losing seasons......just 1 season at .500 and 1 season finishing one game over .500.
Feel better now?
-
Leo is entirely out to lunch and Sal *admits* to being the laziest journalist on the planet and doesn't even realize it. Clowns like these wouldn't last a second if they were trying to get work nowadays. They've been granted in. They're a dying breed. No shock whatsoever that guys like Dunne, Fairburn, Cover 1 Eric, ****, even Galliford do laps around these dinosaurs. Young journos today can't afford to be as apathetic as the old farts tying up the newsroom payroll. And we get better work because of it.
It'll be good riddance when the old guard gets the !@#$ out of the way.
-
He clearly meant you need two things to win, you need the players, and you need to actually win the games. I think we can all identify that part of the reason we didn't make the playoffs was because in 2014 and 2015 we failed to win games that we should have. You'd think that Bills fans would like the fact that the GM is saying "we don't only need to set ourselves up to succeed with the talent, but we need to execute and actually win too, and only then will we be a winning franchise."
But nope, we regress to shallow potshots.
How are they definitely not? I guarantee that they do not look at this as a roadblock to the success of the franchise, and more as an annoying distraction that they would have rather went right, but they will move past it just fine. Terry Pegula's comments reflect that, and Kim Pegula's comments support that they wish that it would have went better but they are moving past it.
They might not view it as an impediment to success, in fact I doubt they do.
But if you think billionaires don't care about optics and how they and their organizations are viewed publicly, you're dead wrong. They care. Deeply.
-
So you're just pointing it out? You expect any one here to believe that? That this is tantamount to you stepping outside, pointing at the sky and saying "blue?"When an organization needs to reshape the public image/message of itself when that image as been damaged, it produces such an interview where the "damaged" individual is allowed to answer predetermined questions by an organization employee in a controlled setting with no chance for going off script or failing to answer appropriately.
This is what propaganda is. There is no chance for the public, though a free press to ask its own questions. Whaley may as well have just read a 6+ minute statement touching on the new HC, TT and the upcoming/draft/season, etc.
When the Allies called Goebbels a propagandist, he never asked "which part was propaganda?
So what? Just call it what is, that's all. No harm in pointing this out, and it can't be credibly denied.
Come out Terry!!
Yeah they're definitely not.Are they? Maybe he's misinformed, but Wawrow doesn't make it sound as though that's so. Kim Pegula didn't sound as though it's so.
Which is why it's puzzling that Berchold still has a job.
-
They are two Bills employees pretending to be conducting an objective press-like interview in order to provide damage control..to correct the message.
So what?
-
-
Tough titties, Dougo
-
If the broad middle assumes every move the Bills make works out then cheers to you my friend.
It doesn't.
But I see you've made up your mind. So, enjoy misery.
-
Hey, I want to drink the Koolaid. But Leslie Frazier is a huge red flag for me. I hope you are right and he is just there to provide support and structure for an attacking D. But I also fear McDermott leaning on Dick Jauron 2.0 for advice on punting and playing not to lose.
If only an exceptionally broad middle existed somewhere between the chasm separating "drinking the koolaid" and you...
And "hope I'm right"..? Right about what? Nobody knows what's going to happen, we haven't been told what's going to happen, and we're light years from SEEING what will happen. I don't have an opinion yet. That's the point here. Step off the ledge.
-
Who ran the D in Carolina? Rivera or McDermott? My understanding is that McDermott ran the D. Can you understand the possibility he will do the same thing Rivera did for him?
Take a deep breath, homey.
It's hardly mid-January.
-
Oh.
Looks like "Tampa 2" is the early 2017 shorthand for "I don't know **** about defense but I'm guessing this is bad so I'm going to complain about it before anything actually happens."
See: "Wide Nine, 2014."
Also, last time we ran what folks here have decided they hate in the "Tampa 2" we fielded a middling defense run by the likes of John DiGorgion and Angelo Crowell.
Anyways, back to the unwarranted bitching/hand wringing.
-
Pegula: "The GM, whether it be hockey, football, baseball, whatever, their job is not to win a press conference. It's to build a team and win championships. If I have a GM and people think his press conferences are a disaster every year, but we start winning, who cares? Let the media say what they want to say. I know there's a guy in New England who gets criticized a lot, but he wins. It's not all about winning the news conference."
Sounded like Kim was the one most PO'd about Whaley's press conference:
How do you think Doug Whaley represented the Bills at his news conference last week?
TP: He did the best he could under some very trying circumstances. That's my answer.
How much does it hurt a business' credibility when one of its leaders stops being believable?
TP: It depends on who stops believing him, I guess.
KP: It does hurt, but it's our job as owners to make sure that decisions are not made on knee-jerk opinions or partial information or one instance. You need to look at the person's body of work, and while sometimes one instance is all it takes to hurt your credibility within the organization, we're not going to jump to any decisions.
Kinda thinking from the sound of that, that if Terry were out of the picture, Kim's knee jerk would have changed Whaley's employment state. Also kinda thinking they learned something from hiring Rex: "it's not about winning the news conference".
Sounds like Scotty B is overdue a trip to the principal's office.
-
You need to look up "sanctimony"
How would you know any of that?
What did Kim say?
0 = explanations you're owed
-
Wait, this is a message board. Other than that we all choose to spend part of our lives hanging out here, how do you know so much about how some of us live the rest of our lives?
Or if it's hanging out on the message board that earns your distain, well, where were you when you saw us here?
OK, so we have a statement from Pegs. We have a statement from Kim. Do we have a statement from Whaley?
If not, I understand why Sullivan is interpreting this as further diminishing Whaley.
Much can be gleaned
-
Oh God....here comes the "Bill Brasky" narrative. The B.S. is gonna get deep pretty quick- find some tall boots or waders.
Or go read a book. Or twiddle your thumbs till baseball season. Or shovel your driveway. Or call your mom.
-
Your pity is poorly disguised sanctimony.
There's no disguise, I'm pretty open in my disdain for how some of you choose to live your lives.
well some of us might say thank you.
and others might wonder why we needed pity ?
You're good, homey.
-
Good god this thread.
I pity some of you. I really do.
-
-
My daughter lives in Denver, have you ever been there-it is beautiful. I think McCoy having worked there before will be tough to get without a lot of money going his way. Still a chance.
Yeah I don't think these guys make their choices based on the weather.
Everything is downhill relative to SD anyways.
-
Denver is just a significantly better run and more successful organization right now. Not to mention he's from California, and went to school in Utah. I have to imagine Denver is an easier sell than telling the wife and kids to pack up, we're moving from San Deigo to Buffalo.
They were 5-7 over their last 12 games.
Their QB situation is just as tenuous as ours.
Their DC was given a lot of credit for how dominant their defense was, now he's gone.
What exactly do they have going that we don't?
-
no reason to believe so. And if I'm McDermott I don't build around Dareus. Not until he wants to show up and do his job. I make his ass buy in
always was. Bills fans look a gift horse in tbr mouth wrt to CBS. He has a value, though. He needs to be retained. I'd go $12mm/yr
Woods is a priority fwiw, IMO.
he is going to be doing stunts. He will keep Ragland clean. Its gonna come down to if Ragland is good or average when its said and done.
Ragland having more than 3 sacks would be surprising. But he needs to have 3-4 picks and several tol's. He needs to have 90+ tackles.
with him I hope we get that hooker out of Columbus. Everyone's mind will be blown.
PBrown on the Weakside?
Lorax or ZBrown on the Strongside?
Any benefits/pitballs you foresee there?
-
Dove Valley sounds like a nice place.
Elway has been quite the darling executive. Is this his first big whiff? Or does he know something the rest of us don't (as he's proven before)?
Childress & Olson Both Reported as Out for Bills' OC
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
You said the same thing about EJ and I called BS then just like I am now. It's a poor excuse for both of their flaws.