Yes, he responded. I especially love the idiot part. Just proving he is person who can't simply talk to people with different views, instead believes that attempting to demean is the best way to go. I believe that shows ones lack of maturity, lack of credibility.
I have stated MANY times (even though I am labeled a liberal) that both sides of government are at fault with the problems our country is facing. Both sides. I have also stated that I wouldn't mind seeing a whole new set of fresh faces in Washington. A new set of ideas that will hopefully get this country moving in the right direction. The right direction with healthcare reform, the economy, job creation, etc. I have also stated that not all union members are good, hard working people (example the Teamsters people keep bringing up), yet the actions of the few do not represent the whole.
To see these statements and to come back with an attack, an failed attempt to demean, etc. do nothing but show a lack of comprehension or reason. A shining example of why nothing ever gets done in Washington.
I agree with this. Most people will do it or try to do it. I know that. I do not want to have someone like Mitt in office. Yeah, he may be strong with the economy, however I feel that his foreign relations background is not strong enough and that he flip flops to much on social issues. Yes, over a half million children are under government care, yet that does not give the government the right to tell women what to do with their body. I don't see how Religion and Women's Rights is a ridiculous issue.
He answered emphatically no. What more is there to say to this?
Again, answered no. Also, stated that he does like it when people use religion as a tool. I agree with that and wish that it would stay out of government and its policies.
Couldn't answer with a simple yes or no. Instead calls me an idiot. Instantly loses any credibility.