The problem is, even if Holcomb can lead the bills to a very productive season how many years can we get from him? I notice that everyone seems convinced that Holcomb can only lead the team to 8-8 at best, but there are so many more factors, of course with EMO gone, that raises another question as to KH productivity.
I think the thing we need to keep in mind is that Marv said this is a rebuilding year. If he had pulled a TD and said we were playoff bound then we might use KH, but even if KH is the better QB as of now, would there be any point in using him, if we are rebuilding for 2007?