Rockinon

My take is that with Washington picking up McNabb, with the exception of Bradford, all QBs will fall to the second round. I would not be in a hurry to grab a QB in the first round. Gamble? Yes, it is. But worth the risk. We could strengthen our offensive or defensive lines in the first round and wait on a QB. Trade down? Nope. Stick with the #9 spot and grab the best lineman available. The talent pool there is bigger and we are more likely to get quality talent there. In Round 2 we may be able to get Clausen, more likely Tebow. In my own mind though, I like Tebow better anyway. The problem I have with trading down is that even though we could get more picks, we are also less likely to get a big impact player. I am pretty confident a QB will be there in the second and the Bills will pull the trigger if Clausen or Tebow are there. After that, it's a going to be up to our teams talent evaluators to pick diamonds in the rough in the later rounds. Even if the gamble does not pay off and both targeted QBs are gone, it is not a complete loss. We still improved our lines and we can then see if our current QB depth can compete with some talent in front of them. To me, taking a QB in the first without getting depth on the lines is asking for trouble. What if the QBs are complete busts?

Campbell is not an upgrade. If you want a QB get him in the draft.

In every case Edwards is last. I sense a pattern here.

Could be right about Tebow. Absolutely right about Bruce.

You know damn well that Tebow is not going to last through the second round. You are just trying to convince people not to take him in round 2 because you really don't want him at all. Who are you trying to kid?

The Bill's FO has been keeping their opinions to themselves as they should. All of the crap speculation is........well, crap.

Was Tebow his QB the year he came out of college?

Have you even looked at Tebow's stats? The kid has completed one hell of a lot of passes.

I think Poz will be better with our defensive line getting bigger.

Jim Kelly doesn't know how to backpedal. He never once said that he would be a great QB. He said that Tebow is a class act and a great guy. Where is the backpedaling? The only reason he is bothering to make a reply is because of all the hype surrounding the dinner he had with the kid.

Again what purpose does it serve to fault the guy at this point? I just don't see what good can come from a post like this.

I don't buy that argument at all. Listing a bunch of past failures has 0% to do with this year. You don't grade a coach on what he has yet to prove. We haven't even played a friggin' game yet. Bone headed post all together.

What purpose does it serve to seek out reasons to fault the guy? I think you're reaching here just to stir up s**t here.

While I am not a big fan of the small skill players selected, I have to disagree about your assumption that some of these guys are non impact players. Parish made one goofy play last year but the guy has consistently lead the league in returns. How many times have you seen him give us great field position? Or take one to the house? McKelvin too. This guy also has great return ability and he is no slouch as a DB. The only reason there is no impact is because our offense can't seem to capitalize on great field position. The non impact is from not getting quality offensive linemen and maybe QBs. I am not yet convinced that our quarterbacks are as bad as they seem either. The only real way to see for sure is to put some quality linemen in front of them and see.

That's because he had Jason Peters watching his blind side last year.

Would be a good depth pick up if the price is right. If asking too much, no thanks. I'll take my chances in the draft.

Harris spent most of the season on the practice squad but performed very well when called upon in the season finale. 2 interceptions against the Colts. I think that was the only game he actually played in.

Conspiracy theorist thinking. Come on people.

He didn't guide the team to 4 consecutive Superbowls by being a dimwit.

Kyle Williams is 6'1" tall and 306lbs. It's not like he is a shrimp. He plays with leverage? Why do you suppose that is? Not because he is stronger? You guys act as if size is everything. It's not. Kyle is a gamer and will be ready. We don't necessarily need a 350lb fat boy. Another NT, yea but if we get another 300-340 pounder in there that can also hustle like Kyle, we would be way better off. What I would like to see is another 3-4 DE as well. In case you guys weren't paying attention last year, Kyle was getting double teamed more than Marcus Stroud because he was applying more pressure. The interesting thing about the 3-4 is that the over all strength of linemen should be greater. Not the over all size. Size is over rated. Strength guys........ strength. Kyle has it.

What a lot of people don't realize is that this drug test is no longer done with a urine sample like the old days. They now just cut a piece of hair and the test can detect as far back as 5 years! So if someone tests positive for smokin' weed, they may have still been in high school at the time.

If Clausen isn't there you get down on your knees and thank Jesus.

I didn't know surgeons performed on rockets.

This board wins as most educated and most obnoxious. And I wouldn't have it any other way.

KC had no Defense.