OCinBuffalo

Yeah, I guess you are going to have to find a new definition for the word: panic. I am not seeing panic. Quite the opposite. Determination. Wishful idiocy. Destroyed in a single phrase: Pence is poised in political perfection. Alliterative, even. Right now, Pence will get to claim all of Trump's results, and none of the baggage. Hell, he can even run on keeping Trump's policies, but without the tweets. (A political master stroke, which he can always change, and revert back to tweeting, because "look at how nasty the left is".)

Simple: without him the NY Times would be dead already. He is the only subject that they write about, and, they are literally operating the National Enquirer business model in doing so. The more salacious, the more likely they are to get a buy. When Trump leaves, so does their golden goose. That's the theory. I don't buy it. Actually, the Mueller investigation is their golden goose. As soon as it concludes, we'll see how the NYT does. You're fooling yourself. 4Chan /pol/ will find out, and dox, this guy in a week. "We" are already working on it. That's if he even exists. I would not be surprised at all if we find out that the real "source" for this story is an ex-Obama official, who knows the basic operations of the WH enough to create credibility. That's the thinking and that's why 4Chan has fired up the "ion cannon"(a totally fake thing, that was really about getting dumb 14-year-olds to become "hackers": to download it, so that we could use their computers for DDoS.) I bet it will still work, even after all this time. Either way, this is literally throwing the gauntlet at the feet of Anonymous. These people are going to be really, really sorry they did that. "Poke the bear"? Not close: Try shooting a .22 at the battleship. EDIT: It is near impossible to get Anons to all work together, not screw with each other, and move on the same thing. You have to be as deranged as Scientology to make that happen. Yet, here we are. The NYT has done the near impossible. Great Job Guys!

You are exactly who I was referring to when I wrote that. Nice work taking the bait.

The usual douchebags have found yet another way to play word games. We all know the general definition of whataboutism. (This **** started on a grand scale with the Clintons.) If not, DuckDuckGo is your friend. Here's what I am seeing now though: a whataboutism trap. It goes like this "We should have 0 American citizens being stopped at the border and having their IDs taken/being detained". Notice: the measurement has now been calibrated to 0, in real time. IF one counters with "We have had the lowest rate of that in 6 years. Why didn't Obama do better?" Out comes the "That is whataboutism!" charge. Remember, the "new standard" is now 0. Due to that, logically, ALL further comparison can ONLY BE whataboutism. The measurement wasn't calibrated, it was recalibrated. Any deviation from 0, whether it was 6 months ago, or 6 years ago, gets dumped into the same "unacceptable" bucket. Thus, if today we have the lowest rate of American citizens having their IDs taken/being detained in the last 6 years? Auto-whataboutism . No rational, mathematical, quantifiable comparisons, or marked improvements are allowed to be defined as such...because they don't meet the new recalibration of 0, and hence they are ALL whataboutism. Goal: Obama cannot be worse than Trump at anything, they MUST always be: both bad, or mediocre. Yeah, and I thought Obama was supposed to be on Mt. Rushmore?! ? Now, all that's left? Semantic contortion. We are recalibrated out of comparing Obama to anyone. Watch for this. It's been happening a lot.

How about we do this by the book? 1. This clown is not capable of enforcing law. Therefore, he does not have the power to make an ICE agent "unsafe" by arresting him. 2. This clown is not capable of interpreting law. Therefore, he does not have the power to hold an ICE agent in contempt, or order him or her about, or affect their "safety" in any way. So, what other way should we interpret this, than, this clown is guilty of assault? He has no power to affect any ICE agent, other than either personally participating in violence against them, or, calling others to do so. ICE officers have every reason to believe that this person is sincere. Hence, why haven't the US Marshals thrown this guy in the slammer for threatening a government employee doing their duty? I'm no lawyer, but I am fairly certain that these laws are on the books, and since this turd can only be speaking as a private citizen and not in any official capacity, why isn't he guilty of prima facie assault on a Federal officer? Intent? The intent is clear: to intimidate the ICE person and therefore prevent them from doing their job.

Seconded. Giving me a mountain of fries I didn't ask for, is never going to make you as good as Fuddruckers, which charges $5-6 less. Also, banning In-N-Out is like banning Duffs. "So, you're telling me that there's going to be 2 less people in a line of 10, and those 2 people are going to liberal douchebags, whose inane babble I don't want to hear anyway, waiting for pickup orders? Um, yeah, I'm just fine with them boycotting...forever". New Project: How do I get idiot liberals to boycott Jim's Steakout from 7-8 pm and/or ~2am-close every night?

...to what I've been saying for at least 2 years. In some parts, what I've been saying for 10+ years. https://freebeacon.com/columns/how-trump-survives/ I've been say this for 2 years now: This is why I have been laughing at the clowns who complain about his twitter feed, since day 1. When are you clowns going to realize that he uses it as a tactic? When are you clowns going to realize that tweeting at 3am does 2 things: annoy the hell out of people who have to cover him, and, constantly deny them sleep? The sleep thing sounds dumb...until you really think about it. Well, some of you can think about until judgment day, and will never get it because don't have the IQ to get it. The rest of you do. ....2 years now: If the leftists could see their way to STFU, and just do normal stories about Trump for just 7 days, this wouldn't be possible. But they can't control themselves. Like feral children, they've been going every day for 2 years, their brains have mal-formed, and now it's impossible to train them to stop. As such, there might be 20k people in this entire country today that are still persuadable regarding media leftist bias. We all know what they do. There's nobody left who says the media isn't biased, and is taken seriously. ...since right after the 2006 midterms: The "coalition of the ascendant" and the "demographics are destiny" arguments have failed so badly, that one of the guys who wrote the original book has called BS on his own work. He is a serious academic. However, we aren't dealing with very many serious people on the left these days. There has been so much psychological commitment to these utter BS theories, that when they inevitably fail to produce the expected results(Trump beating Hillary badly), it mangles what little cognitive skills existed in those who bought into them. Look: one had to be just above retard IQ, or massively affected by emotional contrivance, to believe that Asians, over the course of 20 years, were going to remain a homogeneous voting bloc in the first place. Or Hispanics, or Blacks, or whites. 20 years of culture and experience...is supposed to just go by, and nobody changes their views, never mind whole sections of population? That's like saying the iphone was never going to have an impact on culture, over 20 years. STFU! Saying stuff like that only serves to make some people dumber, and force the rest of us to contend with them.

...on Chelsea Handler. https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/28/chelsea-handler-trump-jr/ I’d say stick to comedy but you weren’t funny enough to avoid cancellation of your Netflix show. Stay away from politics — no reason to suck at two things. https://t.co/TWaIdU0d71 — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) August 28, 2018 Man, that is a PPP-level smack down, which is why I posted it here.

This is how the Dareus arguments/comparisons begin to end: The local media has their knives out and ready Pitch forks and torches ready to go as well I haven't read anything about Coleman that even comes close to this stuff. Building a school in Haiti? Nice PR move, but, that's all it is. IF the jags have to cut Dareus, then yeah, we got the best deal possible for him. Complaining about the Dareus trade as of right now is already: weak. It's simply a weak argument. Getting what we got in a 5th is still better than nothing. IF the jags cut him, then this argument goes from weak to silly. Looks like cut is much more likely than keep because: all it takes is one more thing. What are the chances that Dareus finally sees the light vs. the chances he screws up again, but better yet: why do you want any of this anywhere near your football team, never mind hanging over it?

If any team is capable of running a power running game for 16 weeks, they will, because that almost guarantees a playoff spot. The trouble isn't choosing the scheme, it's having the guys to do it. You have to have the physical, but you also need 5 guys with a collective and individual mean streak. Guys who like to hurt, not injure, other guys. Then, it's difficult to find all 5 guys who can turn that mean streak off when the game is over, and not get into trouble. But still, if you can do it, you'll own the 4th QTR in almost every game. This is doubly true because of today's pass-happy NFL. Defenses have a lot more speed and quickness and less size and strength. If you have the right set of dudes, running power can be devastating, as it was for us in 2015-6. The smallish defenders can only get hit by OLmen so many times before they start to crump. Somehow, Dennison had all the pieces, but decided to throw away the board.

On the upside, isn't that Bush, with yet another pick? Pretty sure that he's been involved in 3 turnovers in the last 3 practices. If McDermott wants to play 3 safeties(Big Nickel)...perhaps he's got his man. Oh man. Now you're in trouble. See, you're not allowed to make that joke, or any like it, anymore. Why? Because I said so, and I'm way more moral than you.

Yes, which is why so few WRs were drafted in the 1st this past draft. The NFL, once again, stands for Not For Long. WRs who haven't been coached properly going in the first round based solely on "measurables" and hype-lights, but with no NFL rout-running preparation? Not. For. Long. College football is regressing towards JV. It started on the path of being unwatchable(they huddle, get set, then everybody looks to the sideline for what to do) a few years ago, and it's rapidly reaching that point. If the only way you can win as a college coach, is to treat your players like children, then...expect a new college coach to destroy you, soon. That's exactly what will happen to the current egomaniacs running college programs. A new crop of coaches(with the requisite balls) are going to come out of "nowhere" and start upsetting them. As a recruit(which I was) that's an easy choice. Why do I care about winning college games, if my real goal is to be a pro? You can stuff your "culture" if it means I end up as a 4th round pick, and lose out on $1 mil a year, for 4 years, because you never allowed me to read a defense.

What a joke price. So we gave up what amounts to an 8th round draft pick(based on valuation of 2 years away picks) for this guy. Perhaps we should send Cleveland some wings too.

Hey, now that you mention it...yeah! But, it also happens when I see things like this: Holding Tanks It makes scared to think there might be something going on in those tanks that causes my swelling.

Are you sure this was an injury? Cause I'm worried if it is. It happens to me a lot.

The only line on the resume that I care about is: what did the coach do when he was here/what is he doing while here. Dennison took the NFL's #1(2?) rushing attack, broke it, tried to glue it back together his way, for no other reason that devotion to his dopey sytem. Then, when that failed, he re-broke it, and tried to glue it back together the way it was. He should have left it the F alone, and focused his effort on the passing game...which ended up being 29th. He essentially had the same players in 2017, in the run game, as we had in 2016. So, no, it's not about the players failing. I'll spot you Sammy leaving, but that's still no excuse for F'ing up the running game as badly as he did. Dennision left things worse than when he found them = -5. Daboll can score a 0 this year, and would still be will be better than Dennison. Besides, there is not much room to move backwards from 29. IF Daboll just gets the running game right, he's already better than Dennison. Moving us from 29th in passing = already better than Dennision. I know it's hard to remember games from last season but, I am telling you: fixing this offense is a lot easier than most people think, regardless of who is playing on O line. The #1 fix for last year's offense was changing coaches, and that has already occurred.

Perhaps, but do you agree that this change has 10X the effect of changing out 1 player? Consider: The year before Dennison we were the premier power blocking run team in the NFL, and probably of the last 10 years. If you can do power, you can own people. We did. We were the #1 rushing team in the league by design, not by default. Then, Dennison comes in last year and changes the entire run concept, for ALL of our run plays(the first 4 games), to zone blocking...because "system". When Dennison realized his idiocy was gonna cost him his job? Presto, we start running more power plays(last 6 games). The players we had, both individually and as a group, were not the best fit for zone. Zone is about getting to a spot first, then using that spot + body position to create holes, thus it emphasizes quickness and flexibility(like wrestling). Power is about being assigned a target, or two, lining up on them, and then: destroy, which emphasizes size and strength(like heavyweight boxing). ALL O lineman need minimums in all 4 characteristics I mentioned to make an NFL squad. It's the emphasis the scheme places on each characteristic, that makes one guy "better" than the next. Thus, a bunch of guys who are above average in all 4, but, are really big and strong(like we had 2 years ago), means you do power: every play you seek and destroy. "Coaching" that ignores their strengths and focuses on what they are only average at, for the sake of a scheme? Folly. Which kind of run concept do the Bills favor today, right now? No one has any idea. Therefore, we can't know if our players today are a better fit than the players last year. The only thing we do know: Dennison is gone and so are his silly notions about forcing players into his system, rather than forcing his system to fit the players(or making a new system entirely). For all we know, the players we have today, right now, fit a zone scheme better than power. See the problem?

I'd prefer to see some film. We don't even have a clue of what the basics of this offense are, what it emphasizes, who is keyed on, etc. Sorry, but when one adds a unknowable Daboll offense to the "paper" we are supposed to consider, it's just not doable. Put another way: the OC that created the '17 offense was flat our fired, which surprised no one. Given that, it's hard to say that the next offense won't be better. It could be just as bad, but, hey, I doubt it. How many stupid play concepts, never mind calls, does Daboll's mere existence delete from last year's offense? We used Shady stupidly for far too many games(hence Ivory now), and, missed opportunities to use him as well, last year. How do I make an on-paper player comparison, when it's ostensibly the same exact player, in a completely different offense, run by a supposedly much better coach?

Sweep the AFC North, thus giving us a leg up on conference record, which in turn gives us a leg up on the Wild Card, at least? Or, simply beat Baltimore twice?

var truth = this.zayjonesSituation("Nailed it"); Actually? The most ironic thing I can think of: Zay Jones does just well enough in preaseason games...that we trade him to Cleveland and get our 5th? pick back + their 5th. It makes sense because Jones is supposed to be a #1-type outside WR, which Cleveland needs. Cleveland doesn't need a package/3rd down WR right now, which Coleman is; not on an recently 0-16 team. They need a #1-type who can help establish the basics. Jones has the size and strength to make it easy for Tyrod or Mayfield to hit the simple curl/out routs. Cleveland is in no position to run exotic plays. Not when most of their house is still on fire(0-16). Apparently our coaches think we are. Who knows? This may end up as a 2 step, but ultimately, player for player trade.

Way. To. Go. Nancy. Drew. Way. To. Go. Nancy. Drew.

Way. To. Go. Nancy. Drew.

I'm really getting sick of that guy. No idea why he isn't banned. All he does is show up before Jets games, talks trash, doesn't know a thing about football, thus doesn't contribute to the community at all, and then? When we crush the Jets, again? He never comes back to take his medicine. Worse: he's an internet tough-guy, and he has openly laughed about paticipating in, and egging on other Jet fans in, terrible behavior. The next time he shows up here I'm seriously considering naming a time/place. I go to NYC all the time. I'll meet him. I'll crush him, throw him in a dumpster, take a picture and post it here.

I know they still have their clearances. You know they still have their clearances. I know that you know that they still have their clearances. You know that I know that they still have their clearances. I know that you know that I know they still have their clearances. You know that I know that you know they still have their clearances.

Christ, I skimmed through this entire thread...only to find that yet again you have beaten me to the punch. I don't even wanna post my picture now, because this is better.