mannc

As I said above, I could envision a trade with Chicago because the Bears have only four picks in this draft and would likely be tempted by pick 60...that's really the only deal I could see with the Bills getting into the top 10...the problem is that I think other teams will also be targeting the Bears for a trade up...

I guess Brady's just really tall...

I agree. I think Chicago is the only real possibility. They do not have a second round pick, so pick 60 might tempt them (along with a first or second next year). The problem is, that regime is on the hot seat and if things don't go well this year, they might not have the opportunity to use next year's draft picks.

Do you think the Jets will trade pick 10 to the Bills to let them draft Rome Odunze or Brian Thomas???🤣 Absolutely no one wants to trade Spencer Brown…

And then the Bills’ coaching brain trust decided OJ was best used as a decoy in his first three years in the NFL…

Brady a good inch or two taller than Josh…

Unless Odunze falls into the mid-teens, which is not totally impossible IMO, I don't see any way this can happen. Teams drafting in the top 9 are not going to want to move back to 28, even for a first round pick next year. People need to understand that the Bills' 2025 first round pick is a devalued asset...anyone acquiring it will have to assume it will be a late-first round pick and the 2025 draft is not expected to be as strong as this one, plus (obviously) the pick can't be used until next year, which devalues it further...

Four posts in and you've managed to say absolutely nothing...are you going to contribute to the thread or not?

So what’s your point?

I think this is going to be the Seahawks’ pick…

Are you?

I’m not selling anything…

He's actually really good after the catch...he returned punts, not a job typically given to players who lack the ability to run with the football...as to Coleman's lesser production in some games, you could say the same thing about every receiver in the draft, and I'm sure the fact that his QB got hurt had a lot to do with it.

Except perhaps Simpson's 1975 season (which he put up at age 28)...

We can only hope...

The Bills have not shown an inclination to take a chance on guys with significant injury histories...

Coleman is a phenomenal athlete who will have a long career in the NFL...people who don't like him seem to be obsessed with his 40 time, which has been shown to have little correlation with NFL success...He's not my favorite WR prospect, but I would not mourn if the Bills were to take him in round 1 or 2.

Don't bet on it...

But why stop at round two? If you look at the even later rounds, you'd get guys like Keenan Allen, Stefon Diggs, Tryreek Hill, Cooper Kupp, Puka Nakua, Nico Collins, Tank Dell, Terry McLaurin, Amon-Re St Brown, Romeo Dobbs, Dionte Johnson, Rashid Shaheed (undrafted), etc...

And yet, under our binary system, "not guilty" is the only available verdict besides guilty. So, even a person who is 100% verifiably innocent of a crime cannot obtain a verdict that is more favorable than "not guilty", at least in a criminal trial. FWIW, it's my understanding that a person who was wrongly convicted of a crime can later be set free based upon a showing of "actual innocence", but that's not what we're talking about here.

Semantics. What is the practical difference? Under our system, “not guilty” is the only available “vindication” for someone wrongly accused of a crime. No one has ever been found “innocent”.

The only Bills player who was, for a time, inarguably the best player in the NFL. IMO, the best running back of all time.

Ok, he was found not guilty. Can you explain the difference?

Yep…like it or not, that’s our system.

Is it a Bills football website, or not? Simpson was found not guilty of murder, just like Tyreek Hill was never convicted of domestic abuse or whatever it is that people here constantly smear him with. I don’t see the hypocrisy you’re talking about.