Jump to content

MattM

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,867
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MattM

  1. It really is "Bizzarro World" over there, no doubt about it--they are the biggest bunch of homers EVER and brook no dissent or even reasonable discussion. I, too, have been banned over there in different incarnations many times, usually for just politely pointing out facts that don't happen to jibe with their warped view of reality (like once on how Bob Kraft was on the Goodell selection committee and was a big Goodell backer, or several times on Spygate). Ask any unbiased observer and they'll tell you that Wilfork's hit was clearly dirty and an intent to injure. Ask any unbiased fan about Pollard's hit and they'll tell you it was a clean hit after he'd been blocked to the ground he was trying to get to the QB. BTW, if hitting a QB low is illegal, how many of those same asswipes were cheering Mike Vrabel's uncalled low leg whip against Philip Rivers in last year's playoff game I wonder?

  2. I don't think the ghost of Tim Russert arranged for Collier to be shot. That would be a malicious move by anyone with supernatural powers.

     

    I completely agree--especially with respect to TR. If he had the power no way he'd do it that way--he was too classy of a guy. If we get a few extra odd bounces our way this year, however, well, that wouldn't surprise me. Rest in peace, Tim, you are still missed. I still haven't been able to bring myself to watch "Meet the Press" this election season....

  3. they canplau anyoen into that system and win. belichek knows how to protect them. nice when you have 4 all pros rushing the passer each play -- and vrabel blitzing. the corners have an easy day at the office.

     

    We'll see about that after next week--if it's the same D as showed up in preseason, you're going to be in for a long year, Brady or no......

  4. They just signed Deltha O'Neal....broke into SportsCenter to give the news.

     

    And on the Pats* message boards they think this is the greatest signing since they got Randy Moss for peanuts last year--he's two years removed from being a playmaker or having decent numbers and lost his starting job last year to a rookie, but who knows, maybe he'll pan out for them, much like Fernando Bryant and Jason Webster did....

  5. http://www.nfljuice.com/2008/08/29/breakin...miss-2-4-games/

     

    While I tend to doubt this myself (seems like we'd have heard more about it elsewhere somehow, as that seems like a big thing to keep secret, even for the Lords of Darkness), I found it on a Pats* message board. If by some miracle it's true, I could see them losing to even KC and I could see them getting absolutely smashed by the Jets. Good times, good times.....

  6. Yeah, right. :)

     

    Gotta love Internet anonymity....

     

    If you read above, I was answering the guy's question about whether any Bills were out this week for unexplained reasons. That's all--I was trying very specifically to say that while Whitner was out this week for personal reasons, I don't know if that had anything to do with any of the suspension talk and am very glad that someone later on said that it was for a different reason apparently. In the post way above, I do recall Rodney not practicing last year before the announcement on his ban (and some recent chatter on Pats* fans boards mentioned this as well in the context of concern about some of their other guys who don't seem to be practicing for unexplained reasons--although with the Pats* that may just be because they're tightlipped about injuries.)

  7. Fingers Crossed! Especially Stroud!!

     

    I completely agree, especially on your "especially" since that would be a whole year for him--our other guys would only get 4 games now that Hargrove's gone. Personally, this has also got me wondering if perhaps this is why Matt Light of the Pats* isn't practicing for undisclosed reasons--Rodney did the same thing last summer before his suspension IIRC.

  8. You guys are hilarious. When we suck, "its only the preaseason", but when the Pats suck its "a sign of things to come." Their QB, and probably best player in the game wasn't even playing, my God.

     

    Fuggin retards, I swear.

     

    I'll ask you, a-wipe--did you watch the game? If not, STFU, and I only use such harsh language to you due to your non-PC comments about "retards" (in my view, anyone who uses that term devalues no one but himself in the eyes of others--I'm willing to bet that you don't have the fortune of knowing anyone who's handicapped, otherwise you'd never use that term, even on a message board). Hey, smart guy, speaking of betting I'll make you a $1000 educational credential bet (mine against yours) with you straight up--want to take that bet? You called me a "retard" after all.

     

    Back to the subject. I did watch those games--all 3 of them and the Pats* look bad. Admittedly, without Brady, Light or Neal, but (a) Neal will be out at least the first 6 weeks on the PUP (Hochstein, his backup, will also likely be out), (b) no one knows what the deal with Light is or when he'll be back and © Brady's attitude this year in terms of practice has been a bit iffy (frolicking with Gisele, etc.). Furthermore, does Brady play D? Their D has been what's really stunk, and that's been with most of their starters playing (as originally noted, last night it was missing only AD and Warren and they got manhandled). I'm not saying that it means they'll suck this year--I wouldn't put it past BB for this all to be an act, but one never knows, and that's why they play the games....

  9. I hate to rain on your parade BUT a team that goes 18-1 the previous year cannot suck overnight.Lets not forget Tom Brady has not played, its only preseason and Belicheat is like the Pentagon, CIA, and FBI all rolled into one ( he never tips his hand and is the master of deception ). I truly BILLIEVE we can give the Cheatriots a run for first place but until we prove we can beat em at least once, the Cheatriots will be the team to beat in our division.

     

     

    Remember the Raiders a few years back--went from 13-3 to 3-13 seemingly overnight? That's what I fervently hope happens here--it would be well-deserved.

     

    Have you actually watched them play at all this pre-season? Most of the starters are playing (ex-Brady, Thomas, Light and Neal), but there really seems to be no spark. They just look flat, old and slow. Perhaps a full serving of reading their own press clippings in the off-season. If Belicheat is trying to feign suckiness to the rest of the league to catch us all by surprise (always a possibility with that piece of work) they're doing it very well....

     

    PS It was hysterical hearing their own fans booing them roundly at halftime this last game, showing once again that they're the biggest bandwagon riders in the history of sports.....

  10. Some interesting stats--

     

    Halftime score--24-3

    halftime yardage-- Eagles 242, Pats* 56

     

    Eagles also had a TD after a long drive nullified and the ball turned over to NE on an iffy call that the Eagles receiver was bobbling the ball going in. Should have been 31-3 at half. Pats* defenders (all starter except Warren and Thomas, as best I could tell) were getting pushed all over the place and their secondary just rotted. As for the Pats* fans' claims that they're plain vanilla for the pre-season, their first play was a reverse to Moss (that got snuffed in the backfield), so tell me another one.

     

    Best for last--remember that famous move of Pats* tackles on pass plays, you know, when they basically tackle the DE on the way to Brady? The one that never seems to get called despite being obvious holding and that gets used about 10 times a game? Well, they actually called it on Britt this game--go figure.....

  11. They've got the best front-three in the business as a group and we don't have a single impact LB like Thomas or anything even close and he turns 31 this year and isn't old for this year. Would I restructure his deal for six years at 50M, no, but if I'm not mistaken we were talking about the present, not three seasons down the road or after Brady stops playing. Mayo looks good too. Their D will still be a top 10 defense this year easily. Some of the reason for that will be the experience with the age although I agree that the age in some of their players is worse than what they gain via experience. But to suggest that the entire unit is aged and over the hill when their entire front is the strongest that they will ever be as a unit doesn't hold much water.

     

    Vrabel is like 32 or 33, not 39. Yes, he's on the downside for sure, but with their front guys it will help. And as long as Harrison plays like he has, age doesn't seem to be an enormous factor.

     

    Vrabel is 33. As for AD (as they call him), I thought he kind of disappeared last year--certainly not worth the large chunk of cash they gave him, IMHO. Remember they also lost Colvin from last year's D, along with Seau (for now, but I suspect he'll be back), Samuel, Gay (their 3rd CB) and their 2nd string safety who logged a lot of minutes (and who's name escapes me). With their front 3 it depends on which Richard Seymour shows up--he's a bit inconsistent. Wilfork is also due for a "karma adjustment"--he's the one guy in the League I might wish an injury on. Rodney's 35 and Lynch is 37--the rest of their secondary is Ellis Hobbs, Fernando Bryant (31--old for a corner), James Sanders, the sucky for a first rounder Brandon Meriweather and 2nd round rookie Wheatley. Why, if you listen to Pats* fans they're even counting on help from Jason Webster (I've told them he won't last 3 games, as Falcons fans told us last summer). I think they're secondary is going to flat out stink--if you can keep their front 7 off your QB you'll have your way with them. Big order, but not impossible. I also stand by my view that if you can grind it out against these guys and keep them on the field they will get steamrolled in the late 3rd and 4th Q, when their age starts to show. Getting back to the topic of this thread--if something happens to Tommy Boy long-term, I think the Pats will be lucky to win 9 games with their current backups and this D.

  12. Full article link

     

    Excerpt:

     

     

     

    Go F yourself

    [/quote"

     

    "You're all just jealous of the Pats* I'm sure"--keep telling yourselves that, Cheatah fans. It's "sportsmanship" like this quote that makes people hate those SOBs--remember all those "well, it's up to you to stop them" threads last year by Pats' fans/defenders? It would be nice if Jauron sent a copy of that quote to our entire team before the first Pats* game this year, but he doesn't strike me as the type to do that. I'd really like to see it be us who slaps that team into next week this year.....

  13. As the kat points out, they haven't tried that at quarterback.

     

    Regarding the defense: Bruschi, Vrabel, Thomas, Harrison, backup NT Kenny Smith, and cornerbacks Fernando Bryant, Jason Webster, and Lewis Sanders are all thirtysomething, and, of course, they just added John Lynch.

     

    Don't forget Seau, who Pats* fans seem to think is still going to come back--ahh, ain't HGH a wonderful drug?.....

  14. Per the Sirius 2 minute drill last night, Brady is staying behind in NE due to a foot injury. If the Pats* don't mess around with the injury report, why has Brady been questionable for every game for the last two seasons at least, due to the supposed shoulder.

     

    Because they're cheating dirtbags (but what else is new?)

     

    KrazyKat---I might agree with the 10-6 or 11-5 if they had a decent backup, but the guys they've got absolutely suck. Just watch tonight in Brady's absence. If you can't get Randy and Welker the ball, what good are they, and with their banged up o-line (Light and Neal have yet to practice this summer, for ex.) plus much more 8 in the box, just watch Maroney and Jordan try to get out of the backfield. Then flip around and see the result on their aging D of actually having to spend more time on the field that would be the result of decreased offensive production and you'd see those guys sucking wind by halftime. IMHO, it would be hysterical how quickly downhill that team would go if something happened to Tommy Boy (or Randy, for that matter) for an extended period.

×
×
  • Create New...