Jump to content

Rubes

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,055

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Rubes

  1. Rubes
    I agree very much with this.
  2. Rubes
    Don't confuse effort with results.
  3. Rubes
    He was the McCoy I first thought we traded Kiko for, which caused me great indigestion.
  4. Rubes
    Frigging Kansas City. That's all I have to say.
  5. Rubes
    I'm loving this thread!
  6. Rubes
    Perhaps, though he still had many years left in his tank. I'd still prefer not relying on their cast-offs.
  7. Rubes
    If I had to pick between shelling out big bucks for Hughes or one of these TEs (and I'm not certain we'd have to pick, but still), I'd go with Hughes. I want him back to keep this defense top notch.
  8. Rubes
    Meh. Great respect for the guy as a player, but I don't want the Patriots** sloppy seconds.
  9. Rubes
    Well done, sir. Well done.
  10. Rubes
    I don't doubt that Spiller, in the right situation, could be a great back. But in my mind, he will always carry a large liability, which is his complete failure as a pass blocker.
  11. Rubes
    You have a better alternative?
  12. Rubes
    Hey, good to see you again, Dean. Looks like it only took a couple of jaw-dropping trades to bring you back!
  13. Rubes
    I suspect we may draft a RB in round 4-5 and, depending on his performance, may see him replace Bryce on the roster. Boobie should stay for his ST play and familiarity with Roman, and Freddy is just too versatile, especially with his pass blocking ability. Then, when Fred is done after this year, the draftee takes his place as #2.
  14. Rubes
    Who needs threads anyway? I'm IN!
  15. Rubes
    That would be Hughes and McCoy vs. Hughes, Kiko, and CJ. And CJ would cost more money than we were paying him.
  16. Rubes
    I'm sure somebody else posted this earlier, but when I first saw the "Alonso traded for McCoy" tweet, for a second my heart stopped thinking it was for Colt McCoy.
  17. Rubes
    Well done, sir.
  18. Rubes
    I don't think you'd want your starting center to also be your long snapper, considering the risk of injury on the offensive line. Even though it seems like long snapping is no big deal, you really don't want to have to rely on your backup option if at all possible, especially for FGs. I can't imagine the Packers will let Bulaga go.
  19. Rubes
    Nice review, thanks for the info. I've been wondering what they'll do about Seantrel and the RT spot, since I haven't heard nearly as much about that position as the G positions.
  20. Rubes
    Boy, you said it. What a crazy, crazy year.
  21. Rubes
    Yeah, that's how I understood it as well, but everybody has injuries that extend beyond the 7 inactives. The problem is that the only option is injured reserve, which screws the season (or most of the season) for the player. I think teams need more flexibility with the roster while forgetting about the inactives.
  22. Rubes
    That's interesting, I would have thought that would count as their Thursday game. I guess not. Very interesting. One of the more baffling things about the NFL.
  23. Rubes
    Now that I agree with!
  24. Rubes
    He was my second cousin, once removed. Never had the chance to meet him, though. He seemed exceptionally cool. Sad day.
  25. Rubes
    Are you this histrionic in all parts of your life?
×
×
  • Create New...