Saint Doug

Not that his old form was any good either. Even at his peak, Vick was never the type to win a Superbowl. Jeff Gacia? I'm all for that. Maybe we can pick up Jason Garrett once he gets fired and he can double as our QB too. Jeff George is always available.

Dumpster driving at its finest. This belongs in the Billy Volek category.

I dunno. I think it would be hard for Jax to give up on Gabbert already. He's been injured, but he has definitely improved over last year. Besides, do young QBs already have to be superstars by their 2nd year in order not to get cut? Many great QBs would have been cut given that standard. I'm more worried about Oakland and KC stealing a QB that is rightfully ours.

Let's hope this gives them a spark and they start winning some games for us.

What makes people think this guy will be around when we pick 6th? Look what happened to Von Miller and Keuchly.

Whoops. Too many beers.

We'll undoubtedly get the one no one else wants. That seems to be how we role.

Meddling owner. I'm sure every GM enjoys being micromanaged.

I'm glad the defense has been called-out. Many people on this board believed we would have had a top-10 defense based on the changes that were made, myself included. But it didn't work out that way. If it had, we likely would have lost only 1-2 games by this point, or even been undefeated.

I did find it ironic on how all these people are trying to get his money and then the next line was how he is being represented by these attorneys. That's just another form of people trying to swindle you out of your money.

That email reads like some of the drunken posts we get on here on Sunday evenings.

I'm fairly sure he never had any surgery. This is just a ploy for him to save face. Sullivan: "Mario, why have you been sucking? Is it because you're not putting forth any effort and lazy?" Williams: "Well, because I've been injured, but I'm all better now after my surgery *wink, wink* (which miraculously healed over the span of a couple days, by the way)". I fully expect him to play lights out now.

If his name wasn't Vick, but some other name with the same performance, no one here would want him.

You just made me want to get off the couch and wander my ass into the eye of the hurricane outside.

In the grand scheme of things, I just don't get the Bills would be better with Vick comments. I'm not a Fitz supporter be any means, but he runs an offense that scores a lot of points, more than Vick's offense. Fitz's biggest problem is turnovers at very in opportune times (and then our D loses the game for us). Guess who else has the same problem? Fitz has thrown 9 INT with 3 fumbles. Vick, 8 INT with 5 fumbles. Yesterday's game was an anomoly for Vick. He usually singlehandedly gift wraps wins for other teams. So, Vick can throw a ball farther than Fitz. Look where that got him? Pretty much nowhere. We would crucify Vick here. Haven't we had enough of QBs who are mistaken prone? Have our standard fallen that much over the years. Plus, I would be careful in saying that Vick behind our line would be so much better. We just don't know. Our line is very good, but this success is partially due to Fitz. He can't throw a ball more than 20 yards, so he gets rid of the ball quickly. Vick wouldn't be getting rid of the ball as quickly. Saying that we would want Vick over Fitz is like picking a Dodge Dart over Kia Rio. I wouldn't want either one. Enough with the cast-offs already. Why do we always get stuck picking the lesser of two evils? I couldn't possibly believe either one would lead us to a Superbowl.

I'm in DC. People here are acting like the world's ending.

Hey, they didn't lose this week. Be grateful.

We should all celebrate today. The Bills did not lose!

In my book, this makes him all the more qualified.

"I have never been charged with a crime...But I soon realized there were still some skeptics out there, so I just decided to audible to doing a 'My Bad on the raping.'" - Roethlisbeger "I take these charges very seriously and look forward to clearing my good name. I respectfully ask all of you to hold your judgment until all of the facts are shown." - Vick

Luck may be the better "prospect", but we have no idea who will be the better NFL QB. It's impossible to pick that. Just look around the NFL. Two of the best QBs in the NFL (Brady, Rodgers) were hardly considered can't miss, one in a lifetime prospects.

He looks good to me on paper, never seen him play though. I'm fairly sure that there's going to be QBs coming out of the woodwork (QBs beyond the usual suspects - Geno, Barkley, Jones) come draft time that will be going in Rd 1 and 2. It's too early for the draft hype we witness come the combine.

This really is not a bad idea. I wonder if its ever been done. Closest thing I can think of is what the Redskins did with the last draft. Worse thing that can happen is that the 2nd pick QB is a bust. It's not like we never had 2nd or 3rd busts. Best thing that can happen is that he develops well and we trade him for another 1st. I just think its poor planning that our current FO has not drafted a QB in the last few drafts. Regardless of the starter, a team should always be grooming a young QB.

I still want to know how they got that 50 number. Wonder if its the average yards an interception is returned with pick-6s counting as 100?