Saint Doug

We can't go all offense. Our defense was one of the worse in the league, remember? Plus, we only have 1 NFL calibre LB on our roster.

I can see why Stevie's acting out and understand his position. Sure, he's making millions of dollars, but he's basically in a deadend job on the Bills. Really, how can you really take your job seriously when your employers don't seem to be either? He wouldn't be acting this way if he was on the 49ers or NE.

Byrd's replacement, duh.

Most mocks out there just list the best players 1-32, basically assigning the teams the BPA. There are even fewer mocks out there that try to get into a GM's head and ask "who will this team really pick?". This mock is the later. Doomed.

I reality, he didn't "outplay" any of his contracts until 2006, when he was awarded a sizable sum of money. He barely played in 2004, so deserved the rookie minimum, which is about how much I will make in 10 years time. In 2005, he didn't "outplay" his contract either. He played the going rate that a RT (the position he played) would make in his first full season. He showed promise, so was moved to LT and was paid generously. Even he thought so, since it was his signature on the contract. In fact, as you astutely point out, he was cut a few times and no teams even sniffed. If it wasn't for the Bills, he would have sold me the insurance I bought a month ago. But, still, I truly sob for that 22 year-old. Many of us would kill for the tribulations he had to go through.

Those are semantics. I meant first real contract. What does basic human needs and/or comfort beyond what any of us can ever dream of with $15 million have to do with his playing ability? That's neither here nor there. It's relevant when assertions such as he has to "make a living" or "support his family" are thrown around.

I just love the comments on here how the NFL is a "business" and how Peters has to financially "look out for himself" first. Truth is, if you look at the first contract he signed with the Bills in 2006, it was for $15 million. 99.9% of the general population would be able to live a very comfortable life and provide for their family if they made the money Peters received in his first contract (the contract he didn't even honor, ironically). There has to be a point where these athletes worry less about the financial aspects of the game and just focus on doing what they supposedly love. Not with Peters though. Now, if Peters wasn't getting paid during his "injury", my dollar says he would have found a way to get on the field last season.

It's actually a picture of Meathead before the operation.

Those darn contracts. I remember when men used to play for free!

I'm fairly certain that if Peters was never even on the Bills, this thread still would have been made. If it's newsworthy enough for a major media outlet to write an article about it, then it's usually fair game for a thread to made about it. For example, there was a thread on here about Lomas Brown purposely allowing Scott Mitchell to get injured and that had nothing to do with the Bills. This story about Peters is similar. Do you still have a problem with Peters?

Good point. He wants to come back to being a huge bust.

Why would Peters want to play here though? We have a losing season every year.

Why would you think this is sarcasm? I happen to believe that TBD, as a collective mind, has a very deep fund of football knowledge. When FA starts, there are usually over 10 new posts per day with people tooting their horn about a player that's available. This is not like the draft where there are hundreds of players to pick from, this is FA. In FA, there are usually less than 100 players anyone would give a damn about, but not one single poster here singled him out, even as a distant possibility. I just don't get it.

If this is such a great signing, why didn't at least one poster on TBD advocate for Branch to be brought in and looked at? You would have thought at least 1 person on here, given no a priori knowledge of the Bills plans, would have thought this may be a good guy to target.

I'm sure Vick appreciates those comments, getting killed and all last season. I guess you only really have to play if your team's winning. Otherwise, why bother.

I'm already with the lack of sacks and how he's not a "penetrating" player, but are his roughly 2 tackles per game going to be enough to stop the run?

Damn, I was hoping the Bills would have deep into the Offseason Workouts playoffs.

Only half-sarcasm. While this wouldn't be a bad signing, it's just not something to cause excitement.

This is some great trash bin sifting. Pretty sure this signing would only amount to an extra warm body for camp.

I can play that game too. Look at San Fran and the Ravens. Did they both have 2 #1s playing opposite sides of each other? I'm not saying you can have any old scrub playing WR, but I would rather have, in addition to Stevie, 600 yrd seasons out of both my #2 and #3 rather than a #2 with 1,200 yrds.

Nice job, Buddy. Doomed.

That may be true, but some of these criticisms are the same ones he used against Newton, most of which have not been proven wrong yet.

I don't know about TJ being good or not, but most playoff teams have shown us that having 2 #1 receivers is not necessary. An great QB should be able to make all WRs shine.

I'm perfectly fine with it. I don't think this guy got a fair shake. Let's see what he can bring, but this signing should not prevent the Bills from taking a QB in rd 1 or 2 (preferably 1).

That's very damning. Although we may be taking these comments out of context, I'm wary of people who don't have at least one good thing to say about someone. The world is not black and white.