Reed83HOF

For the record - I do not follow the juice - Marcellus Wiley re-tweeted it

I hate long FGs anyways, unless it is 3rd and a million from the 35 you should go for the first (based on the game situation of course)

meh it's a samsung

I thought the same exact thing!

tainted Should have bought it from Gronk

ooops

LOL simply a joke based on avatars....

What did @DC Tom (or @Alaska Darin) do to you that they remind you of Jerry Sullivan?

Might want to get in line for the Jets first home game; it will be Bobblehead day

motion works beautifully against this coverage and i agree, it is way better than the back shoulder or over the top throw (we are 3 for 10 on them against Cover 0). I think you need to show that you can consistently do both and to date, the only other time I recall us using motion was the Singletary play earlier in the drive where the pass was deflected - he would have had a massive gain. I put the miss on that on Josh throwing it into the defender instead of putting enough air under it - he panicked and rushed it. I still feel like WR is such a glaring weakness for us, we have 2

We all have good sir

He also needs to work on his hands and technique, his entire football life thus far has been predicated on his speed and athleticism (which are off the charts). He needs the refinement aspect of his game which will come with time. If he isn't quite fully there yet or developing it to be used without rely back to his old ways - it is prudent to clip his time a bit so he doesn't feel overwhelmed and has a chance to slow down and think a bit. Typically when you are drafting blue chippers you know there is a bust potential (it happens every year), but you are betting on the intangibles you can't coach up - speed, athleticism,and size etc. I need to say this because someone will be a jerk at some point, no they usually are not scrubs either in the college level.

Hmmm....Under-sized? So you think a DT who is 6' 1" 287 pounds is undersized in today's NFL? For arguments sake, how do you think a DT who was 6'1"1 287 pounds in the 1990s do with the bigger OLmen back then? I'm not being a turd, just curious because I see this comment a lot on here - is there a feeling that this size has always been too small or is it something newer?

I can only think of 1 who does it really really well all of the time

Best post I have seen here in awhile!