The type of columns you write are factual in nature. The top of the story has gametime stats , history of the series, in essence your writing a box score. This guy was clearly in the human interest/commentary category and therefore has artistic license to embellish or not.
Here's the difference Lori, he was writing a commentary human interest story not a box score. If you wanted stats go to ESPN stats section. But don't fault a guy for a well thought out and well written human interest story.
Baseball is the epitome of over analysis, I surprised they dont keep a stat on what players had for breakfast before a game so they can argue whether Wheatie's or eggs affects the outcome.
Aint that the truth. It must have been an awesome experience to watch the game with no TV timeouts, instant replay, and speaker system blaring. Just watching the game play. A beautiful thing to watch, wish I was there.
Still the point was, he is good enough to play for us why not Indy?
a) We have lower standards?
b) Colts have higher standards?
c) They changed their mind on the trade?
I'll go with option c for $200
The only thing I can add is that my Father in law got bit by a spider on the arm. That spot became large and enflamed like an absess. There weren't any rashes. I forget what the doctor did for him, it was a long time ago.