Jump to content

folz

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,635
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by folz

  1. This is what people outside of our fanbase don't truly understand about being a Bills fan, it's not just football to us. We love our football, no doubt, but It's not just a game or entertainment for us. Our lives and hearts are invested in this team. It's about family! It's our connection to home and the past! It's about perseverance and determination in the face of adversity! It's about hardwork and belief! It's about toughness! It's about still believing in honor, integrity, compassion, and generosity! It's about always supporting your own no matter what! And appreciating what you have, because we know it doesn't come easy. Moments like this (all of the excitement with the ending of the drought and now the donations to Andy's charity) and the snow game, or the crowd chanting and cheering for Scott Norwood after the Super Bowl XXV loss and then watching our guys pick themselves up over and over and over again to go to four straight Super Bowls are extremely rare. There is a bond developed in shared sorrow and in persevering through it together. So, our special moments may be fewer and farther between than many teams, but when they come, the experience and elation of them is far greater. Feelings that I'm not even sure can be matched by a Super Bowl victory because life isn't just about winning, it's about sharing the experience of life itself (the good and the bad) together. We do not just watch our team, we are One with the team, in the locker room, in the community, and on the field, through all of the ups and downs. We are all the Bills! Just donated $114.00 with note in "Company" line saying: $17forDrought/$83forBoyd/$14forAndy
  2. In ending the drought with a 22-16 win that mirrored the 22-16 loss in Nashville in 1999, the dreaded Johnson/Flutie Homerun Throwback (forward pass) game---our last postseason appearance----the Bills removed the so-called Flutie Curse. Now we face a coach that quit on us, leading a team that beat us in our last home playoff game back in 1996. That second-year Jaguars team knocked Kelly out of the game with a concussion, to end his career, and put the last nail in the coffin of the Super Bowl era teams, with a 30-27 victory. Time to finish cleaning the slate. #FreshStart #NewEra
  3. Congrats Tyrod! Best case scenario is you keep Taylor, draft the best QB you can in the draft, and let the two of them and Peterman know that its best man plays. If anyone can manage that scenario as far as the locker room goes, its' McDermott. I mean, what if you draft a QB and he busts or just takes a while to catch on to the pro game and Peterman proves to not be an answer, then what? Tyrod is a pretty good insurance policy.
  4. Kyle, Deonte, TEs (Clay & O'Leary), Tyrod, Safeties (Poyer & Hyde), Gaines. Shout out to Zay, who made a couple of big plays and showed toughness hanging onto the ball as his head was getting knocked off.
  5. Congrats Kyle and Buffalo!!!!! I've said it before, don't wait for retirement, put him on the Wall of Fame now! Heart and soul of the team! And a damn good player who has been Buffalo all the way!
  6. The monkey is off our backs!!!!! The drought is OVER!!!! Rejoice Bills fans! The future looks bright!
  7. YEEEEEESSSSSSSSS! Feels so good! Thanks Andy Dalton and the Bengals...that is probably only the second time in my adult life that I jumped off the couch cheering for a team other than the Bills (the other was the Giants Super Bowl win against the Pats to stop the undefeated season).
  8. I really can't believe how many people are annoyed with a fun and exciting win. I understand wanting to go for it on that 4th down. I wanted them to go for it too. But how can you seriously second guess with such vitriol a strategy that worked? I admit that the coach/team have been very conservative at times this year, but sometimes there is a reason for that---QB play, injuries, weather, etc. A coach is going to be a lot more conservative, for example, with Tyrod at QB than say a Brady, Rodgers, etc. Let alone Joe Webb in a foot of snow. Not to mention that he is a first year head coach. Of course he's going to make some mistakes along the way. And it isn't easy putting and holding a team together with the amount of turnover that has occurred. I mean, some people were predicting a 4-6 win season and we sit at 7-6 with three games to play and still in the playoff hunt. I find it amazing that the torches and pitchforks are out, especially after a win. Question the decision all you want, that's fair, it's a message board. But to be calling for his head and comparing him to Jauron after a win seems very strange to me.
  9. IF the Bills won out (against Miami, NE, and Miami) AND the Pats lose out (to Pitt, Buf, NYJ) Each team would be 10-6 Tie break scenarios for division lead would be: 1. Head to head: this would be a push at one game a piece 2. Best won/loss percentage in the division: with the above scenario, the Pats would be 3-3 in the division (50%) and the Bills would be 4-2 in the division (66.66%) Bills would win the AFC East.
  10. Maybe that 39th ranking mentioned was referring to yards/game rather than total yards. According to the stat list that clayboy54 posted, Taylor is 41st in yards per game. Granted 18 of the QBs ahead of him do not have as many attempts, but I guess that can cut both ways. I have been a Tyrod supporter. I think he's a good person, he works his butt off, he's a good leader, he wants to win for Buffalo... but at this point I too am ready to move on. I'd like to see Peterman start the rest of the way. I think I'd rather see more turnovers if it means actually having a passing game. I mean in 8 of 12 games Taylor has failed to eclipse 200 yards passing and twice had less than 100 yards passing (granted he got injured in New England, but even if he stayed in, he wasn't going to have much more than 100 yards). You don't need your QB to throw for 300/game...but asking for at least 200 yards to keep the offense balanced, shouldn't be asking too much.
  11. Ok, yes...maybe the defenseless player rule #9 applies here. 9. A player who receives a “blindside” block when the path of the offensive blocker is toward or parallel to his own end line. JuJu was at least running parallel to his own endline (if not toward it). But like so many things in the NFL, "blindside" is left up to interpretation. If you watch the video in the link that MAJBobby supplied, see the hits at 1:30, 1:48, 2:06, 2:25, and 2:30. Blindside still seems a bit murky to me. The hits at 1:30 and 2:30 are noted as legal hits by the NFL and those look like they came as much or more from the blindside as JuJu's hit. https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/defenseless-player/ Maybe I'm just an old guy who was used to those hits being legal for most of my football watching days that I don't think of them as illegal. Or maybe it is just the NFL, who has a hard time making their rules clear for all situations.
  12. Sorry, but I still think you guys are wrong...what am I missing? Here is the wording from the actual article that you posted MAJBobby (and apparently the wording in the NFL rule book): "If a player who is aligned in the tackle box when the ball is snapped moves to a position outside the box, he cannot initiate contact on the side and below the waist against an opponent if: (a) the blocker is moving toward his own end line; and (b) he approached the opponent from behind or from the side." The rule contains the following note: "If the near shoulder of the blocker contacts the front of his opponent's body, the ‘peel back' block is legal." JuJu was not aligned in the tackle box, was not moving toward his own end line, and he hit him from the front, not from the side or below the waist. So, the rule you quoted can not be the rule applied for this play. If there is another rule that speaks to this play, I'd be glad to see it. And again, why was Jarvis landry's hit on A. Williams last year legal?
  13. The taunting was stupid and deserves a flag and a fine, but I still cannot figure out how that hit is illegal. It was not helmet to helmet, he led with his shoulder. Tons of plays have incidental helmet to helmet contact, watch any running play that goes up the gut of the D. But 19 did not lead or spear with his head. It is not an illegal peel back or crack back as he did not hit him from the side or back or below the waist. For those calling it illegal, please point out the rule that states such. Totally legal play in my mind...and comparing it to the Gronk hit is ridiculous. The Gronk hit wasn't a legal hit and it wasn't during a play. It's closer to the Landry hit on A. Williams last year, but JuJu didn't launch off his feet like Landry did and Landry's angle was more from the side (and if I remember Landry didn't even get a penalty for his hit). Why did that hit not get any national attention, but this is a dirty, cheap shot as bad as what Gronk did? There is such a double-standard in the NFL. A little karma for Burfict....really hope I don't hear him complain about that hit, with the s%#! he's pulled in this league.
  14. Pats fans are so blind to the smell of their own s#%$. They are so delusional that they really believe (as Gronk did yesterday) that they get screwed by the refs constantly, rather than seeing the reality that they have had the refs on their side for the majority of the last 20 years (against most teams). I mean, what other team gets a free first down in the redzone? I have never seen that one before. The refs actually get very creative in helping that team to have every possible advantage and the sad part is, most of the time they don't even need the help (bastards). And Gronk, Brady, Kraft, et al. act like they get screwed all of the time. Oh the poor, poor Pats...the NFL has it in for them and them only. Please. And it is really hard to believe Gronk's apology when after the play he was laughing about it on the sidelines with a teammate. You're telling me that like 10 minutes later, after yucking it up about cowardly concussing a defenseless player, he was the picture of remorsefulness and just racked with guilt. BS He was one of the only players I kind of liked on the Pats, but he showed his true colors yesterday. POS PAT
  15. Please, please, please go back and read Tre's actual quote. Myself and a few other posters have been trying to point this out for a few days. But it seems all most posters/people do is just read a false headline and immediately assign blame. The media constantly takes things out of context to get you to click...stop reading headlines only and assuming you know what has happened or been said. Tre did not say anything disrespectful or that could be used as bulletin board material. Please note in that headline that the only words quoted were "I don't care" It was the reporter who added the part about Tom Brady's accomplishments. Tre was just answering a question he was asked about the Pats dominance over the Bills and he was saying "I don't care" how many games the Bills have lost to the Pats in the past, most of us guys in the locker room were not here for those games, so we aren't dwelling on them with an inferiority complex. He absolutely said NOTHING about Brady or Brady's accomplishments or the Pats' accomplishments for that matter. I wish people would actually read and look into things a bit. But this damn social media era has everyone read a single headline and then react like crazy people without any facts about what they are talking about.
  16. From what I can find in a quick Google search, each state has their own laws on what a deadly weapon is and will usually list such weapons (firearms, knives, brass knuckles, etc.). However, people have been charged with assault with a deadly weapon from things like shopping carts and a frozen fish. Every state is different, but it appears (as has happened in a number of cases), if the alleged weapon is not on the state's list, it is up to the jury to decide if it was indeed wielded as a deadly weapon. So, in one case an elbow brace might be ruled out as a deadly weapon, but in another case, a jury may decide that it was indeed used as a lethal weapon and can convict as such. Any lawyers on this board who can clarify?
  17. I don't think Gronk should be charged criminally (big suspension and fine yes), but in the court of law, anything can be considered a deadly weapon if used as such. A car, a knife, a bat, a lead pipe, a statue, a chair, etc. can all be considered deadly weapons if they are wielded as such. Gronk did use the brace as a weapon.
  18. Yes, that Burfict hit on Antonio Brown in that game was horrible and cheap and dangerous. But at least it was still in the middle of a play, on the field, where he was trying to make a play for his team. Gronk's hit yesterday was well after the whistle, to a defenseless player lying out of bounds. And as others pointed out, he thought about it, shuffled his feet to get the most impact possible and slammed a metal instrument to the back of Tre's head. It was premeditated, not within the confines of the game (whistle had blown), and cowardly (never shoot a man in the back). Sorry Gronk's hit was worse than even that Burfict hit and I thought Burfict should have been suspended for the season for that one...
  19. This is what I hate about the media and pseudo-media (as this appears to just be a website/twitter account or whatever related to Bills football). So the headline reads as if Tre said "I don't care about Tom Brady's accomplishments" but as you will note only "I don't care" is in quotation marks. He was answering (as others have said) a question asked to him about the history between the Bills and the Pats and he was saying (paraphrased) I don't care what the history between the two teams has been, most of us weren't here for that, so we're not hung up about it or dwelling on previous loses. Which is exactly what his coaches message is to the team. And I'm glad the team is taking on that attitude. It's the old Rocky III "he's not a machine, he's a man" attitude towards the game. He was in no way disrespecting Tom Brady or his accomplishments. This is just a fallacious way of trying to get attention---not by Tre, but by Bills Wire. Shameless imo
  20. E. Wood has been a solid center the entire time he has been here. How is he overrated? It's not like people talk about him as one of the best centers in the league or anything. Football is a team game. No team has All-Pros at every position. Which means every team has positions that could be upgraded. But does that mean we have to hate those players or constantly knock them? No---if a player is happy to be a Bill and is giving his best effort, then I'm rooting for the guy. Because I root for the entire team. I don't understand fans who constantly down our players. Or feel the need to go on Tyrod's twitter to diss him. We could do a hell of a lot worse than E. Wood at center. The guy plays his heart out for this team.
  21. I'm completely on board with McDermott. I think he is the right coach at the right time. But I too was frustrated with the conservativeness at the end of the game. I said before it happened, 'we're going to run three times into the middle of the line, punt, and leave KC too much time on the clock.' But, hopefully he will be more aggressive in those situations, when called upon, as he gains trust in his team and experience as a head coach. Because If we do that against the Pats, we lose that game. Maybe he was just a bit gun-shy after the last 3 games and the benching of Tyrod. Dennison, on the other hand, I'm definitely not sold on yet. The trick pitch play didn't look like a good play even before KC blew it up and I know we don't have our short yardage back (Tolbert) but if I see them pitch it 7 to 9 yards behind the line of scrimmage to Shady on another 3rd and 1 or 3rd and 2 play, I may throw my TV out the window. Still, it was a good team win and keeps hopes alive for a bit longer.
  22. Yeah, to me it looked like he didn't know what the snap count was, allowing Bosa a step or two before he even moved. Mills shouldn't be starting in the first place, but if ever a player doesn't try or risks the health of a teammate, that player should be off the team asap. That was one (of many) of Rex's problems, when Mario was playing half-assed and he never benched him. Not a good look for the rest of the team. I doubt Mills did it on purpose, that's his job, the team's playoff chances, etc. that he could lose by pulling something like that. Instead it just shows the ineptitude of this offensive line, at least in this offensive system. Bring on Seantrel and Groy or Miller. You're willing to bench your QB, why not some underperforming O-linemen.
  23. He dissects the issues with Tyrod well and we can all agree we don't know what we'll get from Peterman yet (I'm a little more hopeful than he seemed...but its fair to be skeptical of a 5th round rookie), but I'm not sure about his assessment as the entire team being bad. "none of it matters because the Bills are a bad team. Not in the way that the Ravens/Dolphins/Raiders are bad, but truly bad." "Melvin Ingram and Joey Bosa are going to dunk all over his offensive line on Sunday." "This won't be garbage time against the Saints shell defense. He'll be working with one of the worst supporting casts in football against a quality defense." Those quotes seemed a bit harsh. Yes, it's tough feeling great about this team after the disastrous way in which the last two games have gone. But worst supporting casts in football? Yes the receivers were pretty bad to start off the year, but now your starting three are Benjamin, Matthews, and Jones (seeming to have gotten over the yips). You have Shady, Clay, DiMarco, and O'Leary. I'm not claiming they're one of the best supporting casts, but one of the worst? Really? I don't know. Yes, the O-line has been struggling, but I still doubt that they are one of the worst in football. As for the defense, they looked horrible the last two games and he was correct in pointing out the pass rushing issues, but they have also put together 5 or 6 really good games. So, I'm not totally counting them out yet. But they do need to figure out the D-line issue (pass rush and against the run). Maybe more blitzes, maybe having brought in a bigger body (Coleman), etc. will help. Anyhow, time will tell. I am hoping that the last two games were a bad stumble in a long race rather than a team finally being exposed as the truly bad team that they are. And I am hoping that Peterman will be a spark, playing the offense the way the OC designed it---which should hopefully make the receivers and O-line look better. But then I'm a Bills fan...ever hopeful.
  24. I really thought your second paragraph was about to go in a different direction (regarding college) than it did. But I'll get to that in a minute...anyhow, this isn't directed at you SoTier but more to the media or ultra-left who always play the race, gender, or whatever card to keep us fighting each other rather than coming together as we should be doing. First of all, opinions are often built upon perceptions rather than reality. The reality is that as of 2016, whites account for about 77% of the U.S. population and blacks about 13.3% of the population. That means that the majority of high schools in the country probably have a white QB simply because there are more white kids overall across the board. So, those kids are all being developed as QBs, while a much smaller number of young black men are, not because of racial bias, but because the pool of kids to draw from is just soooo much smaller. So, the number of black QBs going into the college game prepared is going to be smaller just based on demographics and nothing else. Now, I don't know the exact number of or ratio of black QBs to white QBs in college, but the fact that some feel it should be closer to 50/50 when one pool of players is most likely six times smaller than the other pool of players, seems a bit crazy. Unless, as another poster pointed out, that someone is just assuming that automatically a black athlete is better than a white athlete based on race alone. As to the Bills being lumped into the "racist" NFL coaching and ownerships who won't give black QBs a break, I posted in another thread, the Bills have had 6 black QBs over the last 6 years and they have started 60 of the last 73 games for Buf. So, anyone trying to throw the race card at the Bills organization seems to be way off base. And finally, with all of the discussions about the problems of college QBs transitioning into the league, one thing that I have often heard said about the college game right now is that college coaches are just taking their best athlete and putting him at the QB spot because it gives them the best chance to win at that level. They're not choosing the best passer or the guy who can read defenses, etc. No, just the best athlete. So, many of these guys do not translate to the NFL. It isn't because they are black (look at Johnny Manziel) it is because they aren't the most skilled at what it takes to succeed as a QB at the next level. If the college game were instead grooming the best passers and smartest players (football smarts) then maybe more of the black QBs that start in college would make it in the NFL because they would have the right skills to do so, they would be more than just a great athlete. So much goes into any discussion like this, but the media, social media, and many people just want to scream racism right away. Yes, we need to point out injustice where it stands and not deny issues that exist. Yes, in the past there was a bias by many owners against black QBs (not Ralph though). I am not ignoring that, but Tyrod's situation has nothing to do with that at all. As a country we need to start coming together to discuss issues and cooperate, not just point figures and assess blame. What good does that do? Yes, racism needs to be addressed, but when it turns into everyone is a racist just because they are white or because their words were taken out of context, ugh.
×
×
  • Create New...