dorquemada

Right, because they're not trying to make Jackson be something he isn't

Also, if they dont address the middle of their D, they're going nowhere ever. Basically, at 6-2 we were all wanting them to be as good as that record. They're not. Too many holes and with coaching that seems to highlight the holes rather than hide them

I wonder if they could trade a half dozen bad TEs for a #1 receiver. Alas, to ask is to answer also, Daboll should stick to what he knows, which I'd assume is competitive eating, rather than playcalling in the National Football League

No, you don't understand. Daboll is saving Singletary for NEXT time they play the Browns. He's playing 12th dimensional chess and you're stuck at checkers

They just stacked bad decisions. Rather than a quick out to Beasley, or even one over the middle for a first, throw an ultra low probability pass to Brown, then have to kick from the full distance

His play calling manages to be both ineffective at moving the ball, situationally terrible (can't figure out how to get a first to burn clock to save his life), but also a terrible, boring grind to watch. I don't even know how he does it. A 12 year old mashing buttons in Madden would call a better game

I'm not sure there's a bigger question than 4th and 4 for the game. Additionally, whatever the Bills' analytics team is working on, they're not doing a very good job. Unless, of course, Daboll's super cute and clever play calling is a result of analytics. For example, when facing the #30 run defense, make sure to pass 75% of the time, they'll never know what hit them!

He's not very good?

Yeah I absolutely love this. Now they should move the team back to Buffalo

OK Boomer

Oh, another woke n broke millennial heard from! I'm sure your two word replies were a big hit on Kinja It seems that all of the GMG universe had/has an editorial rule where writers have to work oRaNgE mAn BaD into every article. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, it's just boring, and derivative work that I can find on a million other sites

If there was any actual commercial value to GMG, Ramos wouldnt have had to sell them for pennies on the dollar, after buying GMG for pennies on the dollar in bankruptcy. You absolutely cannot square the cold hard financial facts with your narrative that those were 'valuable' properties. The new management team WANTS the old staff to leave. They want to be content aggregation and advertising, not a lightning rod for controversy and a place for all the cool socialists to hang out, because frankly, that's a pretty lousy demographic to sell to advertisers what with their poor personal grooming and bad financial accumen

Splinter died (deservedly) a month ago. G/O media doesn't really have a political site any more. Remember too that Splinter effectively replaced Gawker after GMG outed Peter Thiel, then released the Hulk Hogan sex tape. During the trail AJ D(whatever his last name was) made a joke while testifying that was pretty much strait up pedophilia, which horrified the judge and jury, who ultimately found for Hogan and effectively bankrupted GMG. Jorge Ramos bought them for pennies on the dollar and mostly used them as a vanity publisher for his own stupid ideas, bled money, and sold at a huge loss to G/O whose plan is to turn it into an advertising platform with some minor content aggregation. It's the best way to wring whatever remaining value is still left. The lesson here is, give a bunch of edgy leftist millenials a somewhat valuable property, watch them burn it to the ground. Get woke, go broke.

daboll will think about your request over 11 pizzas and a nice tall glass of butter

Agreed. And even if he's not a top 10 QB, let him play his game, and get the most out of what he is rather than a pale facsimile of what he will never be

I hate that you're right about this. I'm not sold on any of the QBs of that class either.

And with my innovative 11 TE set, a TE can throw a ball to another TE, with a couple TEs out in front to block. it'll be unstoppable! even dabol cant screw this up!

It's a terrible shame that the Bills are prohibited from ever throwing screen passes, it would be a real boon to this O, and would fit the players we have so well. The good news is the 11 TE set is really looking ready to take the next step

Agreed 100%. When Foster is playing, teams have to respect the deep threat. All this smug, too-cute, multi TE sets where everyone is shoulder to shoulder like the 1902 NY Giants is just the dumbest thing in this day and age. Spread the O out, get Foster on the edge, and complete a couple passes early, stop the safeties from cheating up

I get what you're saying, but the fact is, nobody is afraid of Allen's deep ball this year, and are adjusting their Ds accordingly. The first few games the Run O was better because foolish D coordinators were worried Allen might use his NFL's strongest arm to push the ball downfield. At the end of the day, what I'm saying is that Dabol isn't working out. We're not using the personnel we have for their strengths, or if we are, we have a lot less talent that we thought. I still don't get why we arent seeing more of Foster, there has to be something to that story. I mean put him out there, he can drop the ball just as effectively as Kroft or Knox

The thing at issue is that if a D is worried about your deep passing attack, they can't stack 8 in the box every single play. Josh Allen isn't making any D coordinators worried about that. He will complete a couple per game that go for 25 yards but that's more the receiver getting YAC

So i'll ask the dumb question, is that 25 yards in the air, or the 5 yard in the flat pass that Beasley takes for 30? I'm straining a bit to recollect any completed passes that were in the air for 25 yards+ this year

Indeed. Its just so frustrating. Will the Buffalo Bills ever field a competent, modern offense again? We really haven't had once since the first 8 games of Bledsoe's first season with us

Dabol would turn him into a pocket passer with 3 designed runs per game in an attempt to minimize long drives and scoring This might be an example of where you can make numbers say anything you want to, apropos of nothing.

You are (inadvertently, perhaps) making a good point. For all the hype of last year's QB class, not a one of them looks like Deshawn Watson did in his second year, just as a recent example. Or certainly not Patrick Mahomes. I'm going to withhold judgement for now but for all the happy talk of Allen having "The Best Game of His Career" against Miami, i'm just not seeing it, unless your measuring stick is "how well QB compares to Tyrod Taylor"