Booster4324

AD has a minion?

You can't even get Pee wee Herman right.

Her latest claim was when? Edit - If you can find a way to send her away too, I am all for it.

He didn't? He didn't make all sorts of claims about the ties? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...p;type=politics http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6533367.stm Not even in 2007? I am sure that they are fake because of the sites. I remember seeing him say Iraq was connected to Al-Qaeda.

Which simply makes you a troll, it wouldn't shock me if you were Wacka.

In my opinion, he lied about the need for war with Iraq, defending the claim of weapons of mass destruction and connections with Al-Qaeda. It would seem hypocritical to wish Pelosi to jail for much more minor lies.

I hope she ends up with jail time. Of course, I wish the same for Cheney.

I could argue that it would be very productive if you took the best and brightest off the floor (part-time as they need to stay in touch with the jobs) as sort of a committee that sends one representative to this board. Pity, it will be some sort of appointment that will be political. Some UAW guy who hasn't worked in a factory in ages, if at all, will end up on the board.

Thanks for being the caricature the right on this board portray as liberals. So it is ok for Obama to screw up since Bush did it? Past decisions of Presidents, when wrong, should not be used to justify present decisions if they are the same choice only multiplied. So to make it simple: Bush spending too much money was a bad thing. Bush invading Iraq was a bad thing. Obama spending a lot more money than Bush is a worse thing. If Obama invades 3 middle eastern countries (unlikely thankfully) that is a worse thing. As to the topic of this thread, I do not see it as weakness to change decisions after more information is revealed or further arguments are presented. In fact, I consider it a strong sign of character, if a correct decision is made. I would actually consider it part of the reason those in charge (could be politicians, could be executives) tend to be noncommittal until they gather tons of info. Obama is striving for transparency, he may find that a tough balancing act when dealing with issues like this. An executive of any type that changes decisions frequently however, will not fare well. I must have missed something. Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't flip-flopping been used mainly by the conservatives of late?

Wow at least Blzrul guessed it was a troll. I am not saying that was impressive on her part. It is Crayonz...

Can't sneak one past you...

Always liked Johnny. He was a class act and a part of my life as a kid, since when I got a bit older my mom would let me stay up and watch him occasionally. Amazing how his stuff holds up so well over time. How much of it was improv was so cool. Here's to Johnny and Dom

The only Bill I ever got drunk with was Russell Copeland. I was bartending as well, I am sure some people got some crappy service.

Priceless

Psst Pyrite Gal is a guy, currently posting as Daze and Confused I think. There are a few women around though, thoughts? Lana, Lori, Cablegirl, Aussie? (Sorry if I got any names wrong or for those I left out)

It is freedom of choice, one I disagree with mind you, but still his choice. You have every right to be offended as well, I simply thought that perhaps you had missed his subsequent post.

I thought it would be horribly inappropriate, but

He promptly turned around and slammed Obama. You can relax, it wasn't a shot at conservatives.

Oh dude, stop playing, clean the house or at least go do something for her. It will make your day so much more bearable.

Here's to Bruce. A great athlete, with a few weaknesses, but that simply makes him all the more human.

Terribly sorry, I missed the joke entirely. Perhaps it was the lack of smileys or any indication you were joking at all. Perhaps it was the fact that I thought you were trying to bust Connors balls. *shrugs For what it is worth, I am against gun control until we enforce the laws we do have.

So you have night vision that will allow you to read a sign like that?

So that would explain your posting style, you are essentially a troll.

I will hold you to that, I imagine it will happen and with Obama's knowledge.

Very well, you advocated torture to a man. Now you say you are kidding. I will take you at your word. Are you actually suggesting that torture of 1 man who helped killed thousands is worse than execution? Surely execution is justified in this instance. Yet letting him live and getting info out of him by means that are mostly psychological is somehow worse. Is that your stance?