Booster4324

And you are cool with that cutthroat mentality?

After thinking about it, I would have to say yes. Since you are merely acting out a role, the character "George" is not human. There is a human behind the role, that I grant you.

I have a feeling the mods take it easy on that rule since you are a sock puppet.

That raises an interesting point I haven't seen addressed here, how would the fans IN Buffalo and those who attend the games react to Pig Ben?

Yes, but you didn't show up in time to claim the prize, so we started back up again.

Please provide a quote from the report that indicates she followed Ben. Yeah, you know talking about how drunk she was, considering Ben paid for her drinks and admits some sort of sexual contact, really doesn't help support your case.

Ahh the true reason comes into play.

Good call (close) on the 6 games bit. I hope you are right about the bolded.

Wrong! Illegal for everyone but him...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1694 If he isn't fired, he has been ground up for parts.

I am not arguing for driving while stoned. I am arguing for it to be legal. With a cell phone you can claim minimal distraction with a Bluetooth. Yet studies show you are distracted, probably moreso than a stoner. Now a stoner on a cell phone... The point being, personal responsibility is key.

Knew I would get a bit of pounding over that. Generally speaking, you surround them with overwhelming force and hope they surrender, if not you kill them all. Specifically speaking for Iwo Jima IIRC they just killed them all. My guess in this case they bombed the house and killed the 4 inside, while the 16 outside gave up to overwhelming force. Still, the details are scanty and I guessed you missed my point since 4 of 20 killed is somewhat different than the Japanese death ratio on Iwo Jima.

Okay, but it is still less effecting than alcohol. Simple truth. Cell Phone usage is now considered the equivalent of drunk driving, how do you feel about that?

I got that same feeling from the article. No way I would have turned them in...

Please, I posted earlier how stoned driving isn't much worse than regular driving. Prove it wrong, debunk it. Find a study. Until then you have a crusade against cell phones to pursue. Mind you, we aren't arguing for driving while stoned, you are arguing against it.

That is not terribly logical. Why would you legalize more addictive poisonous plants? Did you happen to catch where marijuana is on the scale out of curiosity? Did you factor in tobacco as has been mentioned multiple times?

They are probably living pretty well then. I am also willing to bet that the best work harder than most think. With that said, why kill the goose if you are making 80k for hustling.

You are like a character off a sit-com, stone cold determined to stick to your story, no matter how wrong.

I am sorry to hear that my friend. No issues between us.

I understand that suicide is a possibility, but there is nothing that indicates that. Sure they may be concealing that, I grant you. I haven't heard of lots of these upper level guys committing suicide though. Is that what happened in your opinion? *winces

I don't have an issue with you. It can and certainly is. Once you have kids it makes a huge difference. Once the kid gets to the crawling stage, there is no way to smoke safely. Sure, you can lock the door, who is there with the kid? Take turns? Sorta boring. We fell out of the habit pretty much except on our weekends. Then when he was outside or at school (bartender and cocktail) we might partake. Since our divorce, I get a little more free time. There is no doubt though that kids change things, at least for us.

I already granted you I made a mistake. I wasn't thinking that one through. Then again, I have an excuse and I am not at work. Are you sure you have never made a mistake? Perhaps one of more long reaching consequences than forgetting to calculate the original BAC to do reductions from? I am referring simply to the board of course.

Still means nothing in the debate about alcohol vs marijuana. My original post about 4 glasses of wine meant say us guys. 4 glasses of wine in one hour for a 170 lb guy equals 0.079 according to this website. http://www.bloodalcoholcalculator.org/

Ok whatever, I wasn't thinking of how high her BAC would go at that weight. It is 5+ hours. So, I freely grant you, 4 glasses of wine demolishes your wife. I am only used to calculating my own BAC. Touche

Well then tax the bitches hard when they get their raises