Dibs

If people read this article it would answer some of the questions running through this thread. I'm not a tech-head, but if the logic in the article is sound, the NFL should be doing yet another thorough investigation involving the Patriots.

I know very little about this sort of thing, but if that article is anywhere close to the money.....Wow! I wonder if the NFL actual will investigate this, or just chalk it up as a fluke unexplainable occurance and move on. Oh how I would love yet another cheating scandle for the Patriots.

....and yet they still do.

It really makes one wonder about the tech used for radioing in the plays. Who needs to tape hand signals when you can just listen in...

I think you need to check your dictionary on the definition of "probable".

Thanks guys. I imagine that the incentives will typically be reached(probowl etc) so it's a 6yr/100M extension. Better(cheaper) than I was hoping for. Thanks to you too. Hell, thanks to everyone! What a great day to be a Bills fan!

Does anybody have the confirmed figure yet? I have seen reports of $108M, $100M and $95M(spotrac)....all for 6 year extensions.

Fantastic!

RB isn't.

Gazuntite.

Your facts checker was obviously away on holidays when you wrote this.

Don't blame me. I wasn't the one boasting about their solo sexual exploits on a public forum.

Man, in the privacy of your own home you can do whatever sexual activity you want....but it's not really any of our business.

The part I had in quotations was also an exact quote from the article....and was the part that was originally being discussed (2nd paragraph in Bills section from memory). The part that you quoted means exactly what it says. I think the point that many are missing here is....what does it matter how badly the Bills might have mismanaged in putting the team together? It is the talent on the field that counts towards whether they are good or not....not how many mistakes, cap issues, or wasted draft picks it took to get them on the field.

I'm starting to get nervous about TT's indecisiveness. First he gets diamond teeth....now he finds dentists offensive. How will he cope making decisions on the field!

Thanks Bill. In my mind the "we don't have a top QB" was/is by far the strongest argument against the trade. Sure, a star WR is always going to be helpful on any team but when you have a good QB throwing to a star WR....that's when it can become magical. I think the "plan" was perhaps too reliant upon the young QB(EJ) developing as hoped for into a good QB....which was a bit of a gamble. Hopefully we can achieve the desired result regardless through TT....and if not, hope EJs improvement isn't a mirage and continues.

Literal lol.

But how does he use his bling mouthpiece to hide his slow eyes?

Well, yes. It doesn't mean that they don't....but it certainly doesn't mean that they do. Why question something so obvious? And re: the maths... The trade cost the Bills one 1st round pick. The player cost the Bills two 1st round picks. Do you honestly think that people who word it that way (myself included) are somehow tŕying to say that the trade cost us two first round picks? Even though every Bills fan(and anyone else who was interestdd on draft day) knows exactly what the trade was? For the record, I liked the trade at the time of the draft....liked it all last year....and still like it now. Two picks IMO is well worth it for one of the premium prospects in the draft....particularly for a character like Watkins.

Huh? Dareus cost us one 1st round pick. Darby cost us one 2nd round pick. Watkins cost us two 1st round picks. Just because someone uses sleightly different termanology that somebody else does not mean they have some sort of agenda.

Who cares what he wears? He could wear bright pink pantaloons on his head for all I care, as long as he plays well.

It is a dunmb-arse article, no doubts....but he never said that. He said "Watkins cost the Bills 2 1st round picks"...which is true.

Well no.....they cheat.

Hehe....you know. Prohibitive of the cap. That money we spent on star players could have been spent on, um, well, other star players.

"The problem, of course, is that those moves came at a prohibitive cost...." I wonder how many extra games we lose this season due to that prohibative cost? With logic like that he would fit right in around here.