H2o

We just had the best two offseasons we have put back to back in about 15 years. We have the most talented roster we've had in about 15 years. They won't be 6-10 unless we have injuries at key positions. The talk of firing everyone off of a hypothetical SI article is laughable.

Omg, are we really talking about firing McDermott/Beane before the season begins?

I have high hopes for Knox and I think he's given more than the average opportunity to make an impact due to our depth chart. Hope he makes the most of it.

Good for him. Glad he has gotten his life together and I hope he's found his niche in this world.

Hyde, Poyer, White, Wallace, Foster, Jordan Phillips, and Matt Barkley should all be a bit higher imo. Hyde should be a 90 overall player and Tre shouldn't be far behind. Poyer should be 86 and I think Wallace should be 78-80. It will work itself out with updates I believe.

I got Brady. How many SB wins do the Pats have without him as the starter?

Jackson is dumb as a box of rocks. For God's sake he didn't realize that a new coordinator meant a new offense. Great athlete, never going to be a great QB. I would be surprised if he's still the starter in Baltimore by the end of his rookie deal.

They're making complete sense, but you can't see it the forest for the trees. It would make it to where you have to pick and choose which players to sit for at least 2 games a year. The only difference is those 2 games could cost your team where as right now they are games "nobody cares about" like you say. It's stupid.

It has nothing to do with making the NFL better. It has nothing to do with player safety. It has nothing to do with mine or your own personal lives and whatever our hearts may be. It has everything to do with trying to squeeze every drop they can out of the most popular sport in America. In my opinion it will make the quality of the games worse because you are looking at two games minimum with lesser talent on the field across the board, especially at QB. It's like having two preseason games that actually count. Those games with that lesser talent could cost you, especially at the QB position. I can't see the players going for this.

But you're taking away from it in the fact that every player is only still available for 16. That means your starting QB has to sit for two of those, your best defenders, and offensive players in genral. It a dumb idea driven by greed, nothing more.

Completely stupid idea imo. Your best players at every position out for at least 2 games of the 18 with your coaching staff picking which two? Sheesh, greed is a mofo

One slight miscalculation and he'll end up like this guy.

Dear God. Can you imagine the cost of the upkeep on that place, let alone the property taxes? The $49,000,000 price tag must have been furnished. The $29,000,000 tag is where the only thing left is the light bulbs. Then you get to spend the other $20,000,000 redecorating.

Having a QB that makes everyone around him look better is more important. Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, Tom Brady, and a few others have made many a good-but-not-great WR rich in this league. They also won championships doing so.

Yeah, I can't see the offense being that run heavy to be honest and we have 4 backs that are all gonna get touches in various ways.

The Miami Dolphins? What? .....

Florio walking into work every morning....

Common Sense: You get yourself into dumb sh*t when you drink. Stay out of bars. Kareem Hunt: Let's go get a beer.

Spygate, Deflate-gate, Velocity-gate?

I don't think anyone here has "slept" on Milano since like week 5 of his rookie year. You could see the athleticism and his fit in this defense.

It's a welcomed change to have talent and depth at positions so we can have a legit competition. Just a few short years ago this was definitely not the case. Another testament to Beane, McDermott, and what they are doing with this team.

PFFahahahahahah

Nope, but he just ate the most acid I've ever seen anyone eat in my life mannnn. Meanwhile, row_33 in his front seat......