Jump to content

BuffaloBilliever

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BuffaloBilliever

  1. You've upset the wrong Bills fan my friend. Aaaand... No to Derrick Harvey/Rogers-Cromartie at 11.
  2. Mista Lynch cause he rocks, Poz because he reminds me of the Hit Man (Conlan), Whitner, Greer, Schouman, Bobby Royal, P-Train, Lee, Keith Ellison, Ko, ... Hmm. I'm not good at naming one favorite.
  3. Lol I always go by the Drafttek stuff, and I think you're doing a damn good job with it, no need for me to get in the way of that haha.
  4. If I'm handling that situation, and there are honestly 16 more players above Malcolm Kelly and Limas Sweed, then I look at it this way. Any DE's above 16: Why shell out more ridiculous money to an unproven DE when we already have the most amount of money already invested in our DEs? Any OT's above 16: We have a perennial Pro Bowl LT and a recent signing of great $ to Langston Walker, so there goes that idea out with window. G's, C's, FB's, TE's, S's, K's, P's, all shouldn't be that high on the draft board. Any LB higher, I wouldn't take. The only worthy one seems to be Rivers, and if we have to take a LB it should be in later rounds. DT is a slim possibility, if Ellis happens to fall that far. Other than that I don't see us taking one until later to fill a rotational need. The only position I could fill at 11 other than WR would be Corner, for the sole fact that we could use a bonafide #1 on the team, rather than two really good #2's. I'd hand in my card with Mr. Malcolm Kelly's name on it.
  5. So, we have a great DE in Schobel, and two other good DE's in Kelsay and Denney, with Neill and an additional depth player in late FA or draft, but we should take a DE first overall? If we want to win soon, we need to fill all the holes that are needed. What we NEED, is a #2 Wide Reciever. We have good DE's, a Good TE, and two solid Corners. Going by the DraftTek needs thing, this is what I see. QB, HB - 9 FB - 3 TE - 2 WR - 1 OL - 8 DE, DT, LB- 9 DLine Rotational - 6 CB - 4 S - 7 K, P - 9 LS - 5 This, is of course, based on starters. We obviously need depth at LB, O-Line and QB (On a serious note folks, Gibran Hamdan just won't cut it). Going for anything other than WR just won't make sense to me. I've said it a thousand times, the reason you have a high draft pick is to get the best player that you need. Just because Mike Mayock says that Mendenhall is the best at 11 doesn't mean that we should get him. Harvey may be a freakish athlete, but that won't put points on the board if Lee's getting double teamed and Robert Royal is dropping clutch passes. There's no point in me arguing this, I'm just waiting for the draft, but it bothers me when people say we need things that the front office doesn't see as a threat, and I just need some valid points rather than just hearing "we'll take him because he's good". I'm always open to change my mind, so if I can get a legitimate, well thought out answer, I'll gladly think it over.
  6. Very bad news.... would've been a massive (literally, 333lbs) asset to any team he got drafted by. Just goes to show the irony of life... Guy I know smokes marijuana three times every day, gets drunk every night, does cocaine, heroin, or opium any time he can get his hands on it, ecstacy, pills, anything, and doesn't have a single health issue. An up and up, in shape, soon to be NFL player who wasn't drinking or doing drugs, dies at random at the young age of 21. Life just isn't fair. My prayers are with his family and may god rest his soul.
  7. Ah ha... misunderstood the arguement. Keep the Ice, down with double kicks.
  8. Icing the kicker has been around for years, it's a great play. Get in their heads just a little bit longer, and hey, it won us a game last year, what's to complain about? Although, Rian would've nailed it from 15 yards further back I say keep that rule, but that's just me...
  9. Miller and Keglar were in my mocks.
  10. Took me a while to maneuver through that link to get it right, but a great mock nonetheless.
  11. Was watching the Trent Edwards draft day thing poster here, and saw the "NFL's hardest hits ever" to the right. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmm8mTpMJPY...feature=related Boy... that just looks painful. Especially seeing Don Beebe land on his neck/head. Also, at 1:13 they show a ST guy for the Bills, but I can't make out who it is. Anyone know?
  12. Wow... he had NO offensive line in college. Haha
  13. Agreed with Lori, you've been around too long to know that won't work. But I like them both I don't care who it is, I just want the guy who can win a ring.
  14. Great guy, I see him falling though.... Check the mock
  15. Bravo ND, bravo. Am I the only one who feels that the Edwards vs. Losman thing is as bad as the Union vs. the Confederacy?
  16. Welcome, but please, see the debates raging in "We will take a WR at 11" and "We will NOT take a WR at 11" and "I'm confused, what are we taking at 11" But again, welcome
  17. "I think some of them was upset." I think some was too, Chad. I think some was too...
  18. pour isite caust mi a fifT. Eye onle gat uh 4t4.
  19. Malcolm Kelly. WR, Oklahoma. Aka.... game breaker/playoff maker
  20. Beyond classic. "That was probably taken out of context..." "... That was in context" "I love the ambience, I love the decor... I spend a lot of time trying to figure out which I like more... The ambience, or the decor." He spent most of his signing bonus on ski ball. Marshawn Lynch is the man... Got'r Done Marv!
  21. Glad to know that Lee (althought mentioned twice) was there, Trent, Spencer, Fred, and Ko as well. The others, of course, but I'm glad one of our FA acquisitions showed.
  22. Awesome, thanks!
  23. Having seen the comeback 2 times in a row, wanted to know if anyone knew of a website that had player names, stats, numbers, et-cetera for the 92 team. Would be greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...