Jump to content

truth on hold

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by truth on hold

  1. "Guilty until proven innocent" standard when a player is accused of anything
  2. that sucker punch was preceded by the most blatant head butt by Ortiz by any boxer Ive ever seen. He got what he deserved
  3. They hit up taxpayers to compensate the families
  4. Has everythung to do with your hypocrisy, that's the point. Bush mocks the faux justification for a war of choice that cost the lives of nearly half a million Iraqi civilians - far more than even Saddam was alleged, almost 5000 dead Americans, and burdened future tax payers with trillions in debt. Not to mention the untold that were left scarred and maimed ....see the boy who lost his arms? Did you know he lost both his parents in the same us airstrike? And all bush and the war-authorizing bill's cosponsor Lieberman can do is yuck it up over cocktails. Shameful beyond words, as is your hypocritical lack of any criticism
  5. Even Sanders would stand a decent chance against your Graham or rubio types - wins on foreign policy - wins on social policy - loses on economic policy, but not terribly and results have shown the penduluum has swung more liberal
  6. What "quality candidate" will the repubes possibly have? Rand Paul is the only one with a chance to offer a distinction on foreign policy....and one that is far more inline with public opinion .....but what are the chances he makes it out of the big money mine field going up against the likes of god-fearing, warmongering types like Graham and rubio who preach to the party's main special interest backers? As bad as hillary is she will make mincemeat of them, just like Obama did against McCain and then even as an unpopular incumbent against Romney. Elections are relative and you can yap about hillarys negatives all you want, but without the right opponent to exploit them it doesn't matter
  7. You like the Bush approach of "taking responsibility" better?
  8. Winston goes neck and neck with clowney for #1 overall last year. Probably is #1 too based on position. Mariota probably 2nd qb taken. Whats your point ?
  9. You don't know the mathematical interpretation of "most" versus "no one". I guess on one hand its comforting the dopes are the ones running around all hysterical about Iran's non-nukes, while on the other its discomforting knowing in a democracy they can vote.
  10. heres the problem with the "NFL player is always wrong in a domestic dispute with a female" disposition. What happens when its 2 females,like this lesbian WNBA couple? Brittney Griner, fiancee Glory Johnson arrested after fight at home http://espn.go.com/wnba/story/_/id/12747571/brittney-griner-phoenix-mercury-arrested-assault-disorderly-conduct women can start it and cause harm too. And if they go about accusing each other with conflicting storied then clearly one woman is wrong. But if this involved an Nfl player the assumption is that he's the guilty party
  11. Yeap exactly the one you misquoted with: *How come no one talks about heart disease?" Good grief, you can't even get your corrections right. Start taking your meds, or get new ones. Do something different, your current remedies aren't working
  12. actual quote which doesn't claim exclusivity: "And what do we hear about most on the news?" interpretation by a dope: "How come no one talks about heart disease?"
  13. If you want to get granular enough, sure then millions of things have been "in the news" last 24 hours. But talk about what's dominating the media airways for months now? Iran's (nonexistent) nuclear weapons. But being able to discriminate useless detail has never been your strong suit
  14. OP's opening sentence: "I wonder what our current POTUS will be doing on the day one of Iran's neighbors (or the USA) announces concerns over Iran's growing nuclear arsenal?" And closing referenced "Teheran" (sic)
  15. The Chinese have been telling us for decades to get our bases out of the south if we want north and south to reconcil. There have been demonstrations in the south saying the same thing. We have nuclear subs patrolling the oceans floors who can kill as many civilians we want at any time. But instead we contribute to the stand off. Why?
  16. You wonder about a lot of irrelevant things, I can tell
  17. Oohhh I'm weewee weewee scaried. Top causes of death in us are things like heart disease, cancer, and accidents. And what do we hear about most on the news? Well Iranian nuclear weapons that don't even exist. Lol what a dope
  18. Its a tough schedule. Super bowl champ (twice) and other AFC conference finalist. 3 teams with winning records that didn't make playoffs (eagles, texans and chiefs), and most of the other non-playoff teams are expected to have improved from last year.
  19. So the NFL concluded what the DA couldn't? NFL has superior investigation powers to local DA? What are they, the CIA?
  20. Looks pretty tough. Somehow how that so-called easy opponent list doesnt look so easy when you see the schedule
  21. That is correct. Without lifting a finger, as soon as Iran signs a deal a deal with they are interpreting much differently than our own national security "Experts" they get access to frozen assets. What could possibly go wrong. All sides claim victory in diplomacy. That's how you know when you have a deal. The Obama administration has for now ruled out taking any government-coordinated actions to expedite the evacuation of remaining U.S. citizens. Theyre on their own. . Lol since when do you care about us citizens in your analysis? The stuff you support only puts them in harm's way
  22. No joke. I was getting on a plane and some idiot had on dark shades, muscle T, and a hat with large lettering that read "bomb factory" . I don't know if it was coincidence or he was showing support , but thankfully today times have changed and he wouldn't be allowed on
  23. Hope he makes it. He got shafted in Denver after salvaging their failing season and leading them to a playoff win. Then thrust into that horrific situation with Jets.
  24. The first woman to cross the finish line at the recent St. Louis Marathon had her victory taken away from her after officials determined that she did not run the event, the St. Louis Dispatch reported Friday. http://nypost.com/2015/04/18/marathon-winner-loses-race-title-because-she-never-ran-the-race/
×
×
  • Create New...