truth on hold

So the chicken chains head honchos support the bibles definition of marriage. But looking thru 10 commandments there's no language excluding gays. Just a ban on married folk getting some on the side. So what are they thinking, gays cheat and starights don't ? http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&source=mog&hl=en&gl=us&client=safari&tab=wi&q=10%20commandments&sa=N&biw=320&bih=356#i=9

I googled "minka kelly butt" and got this: http://backsidepotential.com/wp-content/uploads/minka-kelly-jeans-tight-ass.jpg Not bad, and hey great news looks tape is coming out with Coke as sponsor!

Hey there he is, guy who claims he ignores me once again not ignoring me, with no less than 3 posts! And hey Dingleberry, you got a lot of nerve trying to examine mine or anyone else's psyche. Wanna know why in spite of your ignore claims you keep taking swipes? The thrashings you receive from me are compensation for the loss of attention from peeps who used to support your desparate need to be viewed as intellectually superior and popular. This is the basis for self destructive masochism .... dangerous stuff here man, better take a step back and assess the situation. Only psyche you should spend time analyzing is YOUR OWN. And not on YOUR OWN either, get professional help!

Oh no tomatoe face. You're not going to get away with trying to sound marginally responsible by being open to some restricting parameters, now that you're under the "gun" in here. Not after posting this little ditty in the aurora thread recently: "Tighter gun control, more gun laws, or taking away peoples 2nd amendment rights would not have changed the outcome. Bottom line criminals do not follow laws! Every time after a shooting spree some limousine liberal always want's to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it! It's not the answer to the problem. " Sick dork ya' even turned on your liberal economic brethren when the shootin' started. I dont know where you've been putting in all this hard work. I only hope that by the grace of god it isn't the post office.

Hey tomato while on the surface a seemingly good counter, your lengthy post has several deep flaws. So many i won't review them (extending to you the same courtesy of not believing me). But I both accept and respect your stated work ethic. I must however add that as an employer my own law obiding ethic would have me go right to the very edge of legality regarding new hire screening, to filter out anyone who believes the "right" to own weapons of mass murder is compatible with a "right to life" stance. How in your twisted f#cking mind do those things co-exist?!

Only a comlete idiot would have concluded that. My first and likely last time saying this .... The dumbest post I've ever seen.

Dude why are you personally obsessing about overseas outsourcing ? You actually think it explains your inability to find employment ? From your comments here and your gun lust in the aurora thread, You seem so incompetent and unstable you couldn't hold down a dollar-a-day job at a Beijing sweatshop. Heck at least the righty nut balls like tom and rob got the economic equation right.

Lol OMG @ "romney tax rap" will this be the entertainment at DNC convention ? http://khu.sh/autorap_5010484513281&v2

Lol can't believe Ive been awy for hours, come back and it's 4 pages and growing. It's no secret to anyone where and when they were drafted, that neither has done a whole lot and that theyre gonna need to see more this years. Heck would nix get credit for "standing up" and conceding its been a hot summer? Reality is the message had encouragement anyway: troupes finally putting the injuries behind him, and carrigtons moving inside where his size better suits him. Some "call out". And no e ball I have no agenda against you or anyone else here (unlike you it seems toward me). But this one should have been aborted from the start. Hey everyone can succumb to fan enthusiasm and Get carried away aometimes Don't be so defensive.

Given that he's been vetted as a governor and 2 repub primaries, and is now exposinv himself to the greatest scrutiny as presidential nominee, you really think there's something terribly awry here? Much greater chance your tax buddy doesnt have a clue. I'd recommend you keep it on a social level with him, away from your returns

Dude they're entering their 3rd seasons. And not at the most complicated positions either. How much freaking longer did you expect them to get to develop?

Sounds like fairly benign and obvious stuff. Don't see the big deal here

Romney has been very good at keeping a smile on his face, not getting dragged too low, and managed to remain a positive figure. I think this was his major strength in the debates. It should be a major asset in the election because the overall down in the dumps mood of the country and needing someone positive. But BO is the best political orator since JFK (better IMO). He'll be fighting for his political life and put on a strong showing. Should be a good fight but moneys on BO.

Yeah this guy probably has more money than I do but still expected me to pay for my own dinner.

Funny ain't it. I was having dinner the other night with a guy I used to have respect for. And the subject of Bain and shipping jobs overseas came up. He tried explaining to me how Romney's responsibility as a business man was acting in the financial interests of the company, and to his country by obeying the laws. Whereas "President Mitt" (as he's already calling him) will have the opportunity to make it more attractive for companies to stay and do business here, by passing legislation easing regulatory burden, letting the free market determine labor costs and just generally getting the government "out of the corporate board room" (again in his words.) It was when he started saying that kind of stupid sh#t that I went from "respecting him" to "at one time having had respect for him."

You're absolutely right man. There has to be a limit to business men behaving rationally. Never mind how not doing so would render so many American companies irrelevant in the global economy, killing off even more jobs here at home while driving up consumer prices. This is America dammit, we're not a dumping ground for c#*&k's.

Actually you raise a good point: can government education grants be applied to degree by mail programs?

Wow, this reminds me of being livid at discovering Apple outsources their component manufacturing to China's Foxconn. Never mind how important the lowered cost and Asian supply chain access is to Apple's business. It just ain't right. I admit they had me fooled at first using an American sounding name like "Foxconn" (more like manipulative skunks), but right after finding out I spent the next day firing off dozens Emails to protectionist minded congressman demanding they put an end to this sh#t!

LOL and you think with your contradictory posts you should be taken at your word? At least could have offered the supporting evidence that your dumb ass posts suggest you weren't academically qualified to receive anything.

Yeah, and Krafty has shown his personnel strategy which Im sure he derives from his business: isolate and identify a few guys to protect as your core, giving them the keys to the kingdom. For them seems like it's Brady, Gronk & (maybe) Wilfork. Any lip from anyone else be quick to show em your leverage. Welker being the latest example.

Upcoming contracts certainly another angle to consider. Kraft is cheap and quick to react. Wouldn't surprise me if was a warning to other rostered TEs and their agents who may have been hinting they're worth more somewhere else.

Right, like this ditty from the currently active righty Obama beat-down thread: Rob, on 17 July 2012 - 04:29 PM, said: You didn't take that ****. Someone else made it happen. DC Tom, reply: Probably the corn farmers. Which is why our tax dollars go to their subsidies. -------- So here you are defending education grants cuz you drank at that trough, while at the time same bitching about farm subsidies. Some further musings from Tom and other members of the TBD Alamo (with helpful imagery): ROB'S GUN HOUSE: "That emotionally weak liberal JFK got it wrong trying to lecture us about freedom and responsibility. Instead of telling people to ask themselves what they should be doing for their country, should have been telling them to ask what they can do for their country with their guns." DEV/BRAIN/NULL&VOID: "If guns don't kill people, but people kill people, that means we can all have nukes too. Works for me, so long as they ain't buying nukes with food stamps." DINGLEBERRY TOM IN HIS OFFICE: "If they didn't want to run the risk of being shot in a theatre, why did they go to a theatre in the first place? Idiots "

I wonder if Gronks ankle injury from last year is worse than they're letting on. Or maybe its more general Heath matters given that and his back injury from college.

I liked plax back in the day and thought his penalty was too harsh. But While still productive last year he's obviously starting to lose a step too. Making him even more of a plodder incompatible with gaileys system. Sorry no fit here

So whats the takeaway here with this new information? That there's no connection to guns, but there is to education grants? You've established this as fact, or because your philosophy leads you to conclude guns can't be the problem because its an individuals right, whereas grants must be a factor because its government funding? And Dingleberry Tom you have a lot of nerve busting on him for this idiotic bias error. you defend corrupt corporate practise across the board because its "private sector." You're only intervening here because you probably had some grant benefits too. Same motivation for carving out budget exceptions for defense, appears as though you benefit there too. You have idiocy in common with dev while adding self serving hypocrisy.