truth on hold

BTW if Reid goes to cards their chance of taking QB drops. He's telling them he can fix kolb

You like to take cheap shots and name call. You obviously don't know anything about corporate governance , ignorance and attitude often go hand in hand , as in your case. Ralph owns the team, he calls the shots, he has final approval on everything. Brandon knows he has to do things with an eye to keep Ralph happy. And in a strict legal sense there are plenty of items that will need Ralph's explicit approval and sign off. Example: You think it Brandon can hire a big name coach at a cost that would put the team in deficit and require Ralph to spend money as owner? And he can just do that and Ralph will passively go along? LOL

No one knows if that's actually how it's going to play out. And to what degree Ralph is out of the process. And even if he's conpletely out he has the authority to fire Brandon or anyone else at any time if he doesn't like what they're doing. He's very much involved no matter.

Because he is. Ralph owns the team. Ralph ultimately calls the shots still. He can fire Brandon tomorrow if he wants.

Have to really wonder what will change since Brandon is still reporting to Wilson. Will he really have authority to do whatever it is he wants? We'll see, but this could end up being much ado about nothing.

I doubt it happens but in terms of team needs I think it makes most sense for him to go to jets as OC. But could chan and ryan co-exist?

Rather not because with gailey gone it will be a new system anyway. Fitz only value is his knowledge of gaileys system

Tammebaum is gone but Ryan is staying for jets

Good point on Pryor. To arrive at an estimate of 3 I just probability weighted the teams odds of taking QB. Something like chiefs .9, jags .5, raiders .2, lions .05, cards .7, browns .3, eagles .15 = 2.8

Funny how all the gun lovers tout the safety benefit of having guns in the house arguing it deters would be intruders, yet they go bat$#&% when the names/locations of gun owners are released, which if their claim is correct would maximize the deterrance effect

Way overstates probable QB demand .... 1) Chiefs yes will take QB 2) Jags may not take QB with gabbert, henne and expected arrival of tebow. Have a boatload of needs on both sides of ball 3) Raiders have a lot invested in palmer and he's not the reason they're playing bad 4) Eagles like foles, has all the physical skills, can't imagine taking a QB now 5) lions little chance with Stafford and wealth of needs on both sides of ball 6) Browns will likely stay with what weeden another year 7) cardinals not a lock to take QB. With their horrible line whats the point ? Weighting all that id project 3 are taken before we pick

"Dad, when I grow up, I want to play for the New England Patriots."

Before the game .... "You guys remind me of the Chicago Cubs: you look like you already lost." Mickey Rourke YEAR OF THE DRAGON

How do you know it wasn't? He can be happy they made the playoffs and disappointed he came up 9 short of the record. And to my earlier point, his pursuit of the record was the single biggest factor in their success on offense this season. It sure wasn't ponder.

A lot of great backs that's how they motivate themselves to play best and hence help their teams the most. Emmitt being the best example. I have no problem with AP going for it and being disappointed for coming up just 9 yards short. Per his average that's less than 2 carries.

Sucks so bad he came up 9 short. Dickerson is such a Dickerson without the "erson".

Heard this at (of all places) a Japanese toy store today. My recollection of the song was bad. But I have to admit today it had the joint rocking .....

Ah yeah, thought title said it all. With these offenses not sure my answer would be all that different lol

45 Refs for most part keep flags in their pockets in order to get this one over early.

Good stuff. I had no idea fluties record as starter was that good. Similar winning % as Kelly

This is scary. ESPN analysts have a clean sweep predicting bills over jets: http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks

"Chan Gailey deserves to lose his, but will the Buffalo Bills actually make the change?" That's not mentioning gailey ?

So did buddy agree to fire chan to save himself or did he refuse and they're both gone ?

But he's not a smart guy. I could see another Matt Millen/isiah Thomas kind of scenario

@ the zone 1. Tied his future to Fitzpatrick 2. In over his head as a HC, which especially caught up to him on the defensive side of the ball