truth on hold

Others don't get that a draft where a player has no say where he's taken and a coach whose a free agent are totally different things. No doubt kelly was more actively pursued, by both NFL teams and to stay at his college team. He got paid a lot more than Marrone. This really is not a debatable subject. That some remain so ignorant and hung up on this is unreal.

John McCain is demanding a no fly zone be established so this brave freedom fighter can enjoy his lunch in peace

Could be this woman's daughter ...

Anyone with the slightest clue would have understood that's what I meant in my response to bbb. That's what I mean, your lame attempts to sound smart ... maybe they have value putting people to sleep because they're so old and tiring. Certainly have no analytic value.

I generally agree with all that. I was challenging the assertion he was hottest prospect ahead of kelly

Nice work the people we're supporting over there (NSFW unless you work at the State Department and want to see the benefactors of our support) Syria rebel cuts out soldier's heart and eats it http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/13/303319/syria-rebel-cuts-eats-soldiers-heart/

Who cares? Without doubt kelly was the hotter prospect, and by a wide margin. Like BPA I like the early signs I'm seeing out of the new crew, but let's not kid ourselves marrone's stock was anywhere near Kelly's.

This opinion is invalidated from the start because IMO this whole "#1, #2 etc etc WR" is an antiquated way of looking at WR's these days. Whose #1 between White and Jones in ATL? When Gronk and Welker were both on the field, who was Brady's #1 receiving target? It's a pass first league and every WR is expected to get balls thrown his way and come down with them. Read progressions don't follow a rigid "#1 to #2 to #3" pattern. its based firstly on who is most open relative to coverage

Excellent post

Mess with the feds and their big campaign donor special interest groups, here's what you get ...

When viewed objectively that's the only conclusion. Its incredible how attached many on this board became to the 3 headed monster of nix-gailey-fitz.

This little experiment of taking you off ignore just isn't working out. Your combination of ignorance and attitude really is quite tiring. Because of the seriousness of the matter I'll make an exception and spell this out further. When someone dies of breast cancer its not because it was benign and stayed isolated in the breasts. That should be obvious because the breasts can be removed and people can still live. Not true of vital organs. The pre-emptiveness of removing breasts from someone with jolie's risk profile is that it has a high chance of starting there, metasticizing and spreading to vital organs which cannot be removed without killing her.

No its the risk of spreading to other parts of the body they're addressing

Yeah and under levy shannie never would have talked to us in the first because there was no meeting his price. Money wasn't the issue this time. Also are you calling good old bud man a liar for saying he passed over a number of high profile candidates who reached out to him to take Chan?

With that being the case I think she came out because she knew it wouldn't be kept a secret forever (surprised press hadn't gotten a hold of it already), so she didn't have to get into denial game.

with all the healthy women having boob jobs, I wonder why women with masectomies cant have them to replace what they lost, at least cosmetically.

Wow, feel bad for her. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Bud/man had a much broader universe of candidates to draw from because Ralph had made it clear he would open up the wallet this time. He CHOSE chan.

Thats why its a farce when people get upset about new legislation being proposed to allow more govt surveillance. They're doing all this stuff anyway.

Pt 1 is absolutely ridiculous. Jauron was a bum without a job that nobody wanted. As for Chan, bud man said several high profile names reached out to him about the opening. He CHOSE Chan

It was in the cards as soon as some of the reins were taken from Ralph. Latest draft was totally out of character -- taking QB high, trading around, etc. He came across sounding incompetent on the recorded call w/ Tampa GM. he liked to toot his own horn and act like some wheeler dealer, but there wasnt substance behind it. Bills did him a favor by letting him go out without saying he was fired

So whats the point of stuff like that? Because Israel cheerleaders say those countries do bad things it means Israel can too? Can Israel defend itself separately? Also, if they're crying hypocrisy now, why weren't they doing the same when South African boycotters weren't boycotting Israel too?

You missed the joke. Of course nothing out of Israel could ever be offensive. Like this bogus article from The Guardian: According to Shurat HaDin, an Israel law centre which represents victims of terrorism, the equipment has been provided by the hi-tech firm, Intel, since 1997. "Hawking's decision to join the boycott of Israel is quite hypocritical for an individual who prides himself on his whole intellectual accomplishment. His whole computer-based communications system runs on a chip designed by Israel's Intel team. I suggest if he truly wants to pull out of Israel he should also pull out his Intel Core i7 from his tablet," said Nitsana Darshan-Leitner of Shurat HaDin. http://www.guardian....-israel-boycott Musta ben dem dam E-Ron-Ions behind it. Time for America to send over its men and money to defend Israel's honor. Right, Mr. Canada?

Course not, they're never responsible for anything.

Stay classy Israel, instead of reflecting on your own policies or acknowledging his right not to attend , turn on his devastating illness.