actually it's just the opposite. We're supposed to just take it on faith around here that Woods is "great, a stud, steal @ 41 overall, the next Hines Ward, etc etc" even though his numbers say otherwise. I hope he becomes all the positive things people are saying about him (and more), but there are reasons to doubt it too. Until the numbers say otherwise, he's not "great, a stud, steal @ 41 overall, the next Hines Ward, etc etc"