DrFishfinder

And so the defense gets better, we win more games, finish with a better record and have ab so lootely NO chance at Luck. And the rest of those QBs are gambles AFAIC. I'm not saying don't draft for defense, I definitely think we should because it is THE gaping hole on the team. But just understand that if the Bills get better next season, they'l have no luck....so to speak. Ahem.

Mallett in round 2.

Mine too. Why? Because they can.

True dat.

Maybe he prefers Playgirl instead? Is that still around?

You certainly fit the description of "optimist." I can't recall anyone, sportswriters, etc., saying anything remotely like this. We'd all love it if Aaron did turn out to be at least a decent player, but there really hasn't been anything to indicate that that's going to happen.

The questions that need answers are: Who is behind this? Why now? What do they really want? ....and probably more

You should care, Jim. Butterfly Effect x 1,000,000,000

I think by next season, another way will emerge and our enterprising Wallers will sniff it out.

Gee, sharks in the ocean....now THAT's newsworthy. NEWS FLASH: THOUSANDS OF BIRDS INVADE SKIES THROUGHOUT UNITED STATES.

Despite your eloquence, no. Not this year. Better? They seem to be heading that way. But they have a lot of holes to fill and past history has provided more square pegs in round holes than round in round. Prominence? No. New England and the Jets are going to be at the top of the AFC East. Maybe a wild card, but not unless they fix the putrid run defense first, and get some semblance of pressure on opposing QB's, second.

He was such a good choice that Andy Reid is slapping the franchise tag on ...... Vick. Meh, de meh, meh, meh.

I vaguely remember a time when Maher used to be somewhat humorous.

Not a whole lot to add to this. Can't stop the run, can't put pressure on opposing QB's, D can't get off the field, O can't (typically) win from behind. Stop the run, get pressure on the opposing QB so the D can get off the field, the O can find some rhythm and we're > .500

Spot on. Bud Adams is the new Al Davis. Toons.

A big "meh" on Buried.

I have a good one. I need a bigger one. "Can you hook me up?" To what, a car battery?

Should have been, "The Boring American Who Stares a Lot."

The Town really was a good movie. I'm trying Buried tonight.

You got me on Gailey. But Thurman a Dolphin? Yeah, I know he wore the uni, but I think even he admitted it was a mistake, no?

Well count me as one who thinks this is bad karma. Name one, ONE ex-Dolphin player or coach (George Edwards, anyone?) who has been beneficial for the Bills. I'm waiting......tap, tap, tap, tap, tap........

While I do not disagree with your points, I think it is also worth pointing out that: 1) The Bears defense did a good job of throttling Seattle's mediocre offense. 2) Probably the most important part is that the Bears were able to run the ball and Cutler didn't throw an INT, which he is fairly prone to do. He was 15/28 which is decent, but not lights-out by any means. When a team like the Bears can run the ball, win TOP and let the defense do their job, the odds are good. On top of that, Cutler playing error free pretty much seals the deal.

I have several good friends who are NE fans and from that area. Gotta go with my buds.

Now I'm a Taurus? I don't think so, Slippy. Still a whacked out Gemini. Roses are red violets are blue I'm schizophrenic and I am too.

um....a blue chipper will be there at that spot. Now....whether or not the Bills actually take one, or screw the pooch on another jaw-dropping clunker remains to be seen. Lots of picks is a good thing if you're Belichick and can plug round pegs in round holes. The Bills have not demonstrated that ability to a great degree in the past.