todd

The Shockers. There's probably a good logo for that somewhere.

I don't think there's a method for appeal for coaches. They aren't under the CBA.

I think it is great. His numbers over the last few years make it very easy to sign and keep other players. They could do something with Marcel where his numbers are higher during the years where Jerry's are lower and still get him paid. Very, very smart to structure a contract where they aren't hamstrung and can't pay other good players in the future. Love it.

This.

Precursor to firing Sullivan? One can dream ...

I know, right? WE could have had Tebow!

Camp fodder. Didn't see him shed many blocks, and didn't seem to react very quickly.

I can't believe they gave them an asterisk. Seriously stupid move*. * because they should give them two.

I'm sure they were required to sign a confidentiality agreement or threatened with denial of a separation package.

He looks good, but there's no way NFL players miss that many tackles.

That was tremendous.

I can't imagine why anyone would get worked up over a 6th or 7th round pick. Get realistic, fellas.

Did Jerry Sullivan just call a 3rd round pick "horrifying"? Please. What a douche.

And namath has credibility why?

The problem is that he sucks. And since he's proven that he's not good and a major distraction because of the attention he gets for whatever reason (confounding because he's a bad QB), he's not an ideal backup. Why the heck would a team want a bad backup QB that gets tons of attention for no reason, even when he doesn't play? Tebow has the lowest QBR of any quarterback with at least 30 games since 2010. THE WORST. The eagles have 3 of the top 5 worst QBs on that list. Mark Sanchez, Sam Bradford, and Tim Tebow. Hilarious.

I bet he doesn't even make the team. He's horrible.

Oneski.

Cool!

He's a bad QB, on and off the field. I don't understand the obsession with signing bad QBs. People were obsessed with Tebow, as well, and he's a really bad QB. We shouldn't sign bad QBs, especially if they are bouche dags.

Yeah, I thought he was making an announcement that he was exploring a porn career.

Yeah, that's one I thought was clearly Sullivan so I didn't click on it or read it. I'm sure it is just the beginning of his idiotic negative crap articles.

So now there is no part of the Jets that indicates they are a New York team. 100% New Jersey.

Because we already have a guy we can roll the dice with that has just as much a chance, and it won't cost us a draft pick. RG has been dreadful. Way worse than EJ. Why would we bring someone worse than EJ to the team?

I hate grading individual moves. It is stupid, because there's no way a team looks at a single move as critical. I would only grade an entire offseason. Criteria: 1. What to the FA and trades look like to influence the roster as a whole? 2. What goals cap-wise is the team trying to achieve in the next few years? 3. Aside from $$, has the team executed what is a cohesive plan to get better and address gaps? 4. How do this year's offseason moves set the team up for the draft for the next few years? 5. Has the team gotten rid of players that may not fit, or may be in decline? Individual grades are just stupid, and it drives me crazy when fans do it, too. You just can't look at things like that. Looking at this, I think the Bills did pretty well. They addressed the QB position the best they could. There were ZERO options at QB this offseason, and the Bills did what they could. The addressed major skill positions on offense that were holding the Bills back. The only gap is OG, but there weren't many first-tier options to go after. I expect the Bills will add a few players after the draft. No. In terms of an overall plan, it makes more sense. Grading individual moves and not an entire offseason is stupid.

Why? Zero experience, and no assurances of success. Would you give up a player or pick for that, knowing he will likely be cut because he's just not that good?