DC Tom

"Oh yeah? Well, if that's true, you have me on video, then tell me...what color was the duck?"

Still Constitutional. The Houses of Congress have sole discretion to determine their rules of proceedings, including how they determine their rules of proceedings. There's nothing that says the House can't simply allow the Speaker to make it up as he goes along.

The YPG? The militia of the Russian-backed designated terrorist group PKK? That YPG? Didn't someone mention them weeks ago, in relation to the question "Who are the Kurds?"

Determining House procedure lies solely with the House. Which means that the House has the sole responsibility of determining how they pursue impeachment. So let's go check the parlimentary rules for the current sitting House, and see what they say about impeachment. They say... ...nothing. There are no defined impeachment procedures. They basically half-ass it on the fly. But - and this is important - they have a Constitutional right to determine their impeachment procedure as "half-assing it on the fly." It's like McConnell's hold-up of the Garland nomination: stupid, juvenile, counter-productive, and entirely Constitutional.

"Sympathy is insulting." I give you your modern Democratic Party.

The real point, though, was "Heisman Marmot."

Jamie Martin Marc Bulger Carson Palmer Trent Edwards Jake Locker Ryan Mallett Geno Smith Bryce Petty Jameis Winston And now, Josh Rosen joins the list of "quarterbacks who have been benched, by injury or incompetence, for Ryan Fitzpatrick." However, only Trent Edwards and Geno Smith have the truly elite status of being benched for Fitzbeardy twice.

Come on now. Tibs may be an inveterate #######, but even he has standards. No one considers Patriots fans "good people."

He's always kept questionable company.

Except the left's leadership always operates from a position of fear and weakness. It's their bread and butter - convincing their constituency they're weak, and thus should be afraid. They even do it when they have power (when's the last time Democrats didn't play the victim card? 1976?) That's the real reason for my doubt of your interpretation of their actions: this is typical whiny-ass Democratic behavior. It's not exceptional. They always act like toddlers who can't understand why they keep losing at tic-tac-toe.

Although I didn't call him an idiot, I gave serious consideration to doing so for those three words alone.

The left is going to eat that up. "Pelosi stands up to a room full of cis-patriarchal old white men. Yay, Feminism! #CaptainMarvelous"

Eagerly awaiting the Babylon Bee story: "Joe Biden Claims 'I never had a son!'"

I think I'm more offended by the idea of "It's secret because it's analogous to a grand jury." ***** seriously? Impeachment by metaphor? What, we're just making ***** up as we go along?

On behalf of whatever-idiot-brought-it-up a few days ago, I'd like to suggest trading Shaq Lawson for Von Miller. Because yeah, that plan was a gem.

Wait...what? Impeachment hearings are like grand juries because the defendant has no right to a defense?

I can't watch her. No, literally...she so completely defies the laws of physics that my brain is incapable of processing videos of her performances.

He's a definite upgrade for the Dolphins at whatever-the-hell position he plays.

Because they all look identical, standing in formation. It symbolizes something, alright. It symbolizes cloning. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!

They're Democrats. Somebody probably misused a pronoun somewhere or something.

Strzok is getting three years for FISA abuses. That's it. There'll be back room deals about retiring from public life (no books, no TV deals, just go away quietly). But Strzok is the sacrificial lamb that gets everyone else out of criminal charges.

I've heard this from multiple sources as well. Some of the specifics are pretty gruesome, like ROEs that wouldn't let fire bases respond at all to mortar bombardments.

Silly leftists think the executive is more important than the legislature, but call everyone else fascists.

No one's being prosecuted over this. I mean, sure, they'll sacrifice some little fish on procedural stuff. But no one meaningful.

Fact check: There is no evidence of Jim Acosta ever being honest, either.