Jump to content

DC Tom

Community Member
  • Posts

    71,391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DC Tom

  1. Windmills don't "push" winds. If they did, you'd have a perpetual motion machine.
  2. I'm old enough to remember when questioning the DoJ was "obstruction of justice."
  3. Didn't even know murder by a jury was a crime...
  4. Yeah, there's an actual federal law and everything. Which actually makes this a truly impeachable offense, come to think of it...
  5. Really? You have to be an idiot to pass up this opportunity...
  6. Cybersquatting. Like when you're just some halfwit schmoe on the internet who registers "SmartyJonesWinsTheTripleCrown" in the hopes it becomes worth something to the horse's owners if Smarty Jones wins the Triple Crown.
  7. And look at what other shocking news breaks today... https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-records-strongly-corroborate-sex-assault-claims-accuser/story?id=66509771&cid=clicksource_4380645_null_hero_hed
  8. This is not something to celebrate. Innocent people are going to die in the resulting violence.
  9. They're not lying. The Truth is what the NYT says it is. They're the paper of record.
  10. What is "throupling?" I mean, not "what is it," but what the hell is that word, and who is the brainless monkey that thought "You know, that's a good word, that should totally be a thing." Because it should not be a thing. It's a stupid word, and whoever made it a thing should be hung upside-down by their toes and forced to listen to Faster Pussycat's cover of Carly Simon's "You're so Vain" on a never-ending loop.
  11. "Consensually non-monogamous relationship" is awfully broad. If I, in my young, single years, was banging a married chick, it strikes me that three people would have been involved: her involvement would have been consensual and non-monogamous, mine would have been consensual (although monogamous), and he would have been unknowingly (and non-consensually) involved in a non-monogamous relationship. So 1 in 5 seems kinda low.
  12. If it helps, I can call you an idiot.
  13. Did you miss the part where the NYT is already implying this is fake investigation for political purposes? They'll take it a step further soon. Probably something about Barr being Trump's Goering or Himmler (or Roehm, if they're really knowledgeable), taking control of the justice system for the party's benefit and persecuting their political opponents to create a one party state. There is literally someone at his company named "Goehring" calling Trump a Nazi.
  14. He does. Actually, it does. Having a voice is a prerequisite for being an idiot. If it weren't, I'd only have about 5000 posts, not 70,000.
  15. *Makes a claim* "Prove it!" "Why? I'm not a scientist, so I can just parrot any bull#### I please, and don't have to discuss it." And you claim to be a teacher? You ***** idiot.
  16. ...and they're neck and neck, going in to the 12th!...
  17. It's right there! Lines! Can't you see?
  18. I think it's important to note, too, that we've driven off more than a few "conservatives" who contributed nothing but bumper sticker bull#### as well. Who was the Trump supporter from a few years back who lasted about six weeks? Then there's Rich in Ohio. And Baskin...or so he says.
  19. Not all bad. He levitates.
  20. I'm thinking between that and her name being "April Teale," she does that on stage a few nights a week...
  21. The Democratic presidential candidates. They're probably the only ones who support this. Hell, Warren's probably about to announce she had hormone therapy as a kid.
  22. I'm triggered by jazz hands. ***** show choir freaks.
  23. Worst extortion ever. "We're giving you money. Can you do me a favor and look in to something, though?" "Sure." "Thanks. Here's your money. My people will call your people." "Don't you want us to look in to that thing first?" "Nah, I trust you."
×
×
  • Create New...