DC Tom

Actually, I rather get the vibe from Strzrzzrzok that discomfort is his particular kink.

No ***** *****, buckwheat. That's why those are two questions above.

Are we at war? Is someone giving an enemy aix and comfort?

You're right. He said "Don't judge the impeachment process on process." That's even dumber.

Stupid. The ends do not justify the means. Process matters. It's the difference between the rule of law and the rule of man. I don't care what the source is. If they say process isn't important, they're dead ***** wrong.

These people have never heard of Cher Ami, have they?

Well, it's about goddamn time!

The interesting part of that story isn't that increased ice can cause global cooling. It's that the temperature drop can precede the drop in CO2 levels. That's a pretty big finding, that CO2 concentrations lag temperature.

Am I the only one who remember that it was Susan Rice who established the policy of not calling the Rwandan Genocide a "genocide" because it would negatively impact mid-term elections? ?????

Fortunately, that's all health care needed, since the ACA fixed everything.

Where's the conviction?

Article's still there. https://www.wired.com/story/the-glorious-victories-of-trans-athletes-are-shaking-up-sports/

"Levying war against, or giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States." Fraud, even in conspiracy with foreign governments, is neither levying war nor giving aid and comfort to an enemy.

The medal is also a PAW PRINT. ***** morons.

Treason is levying war against, or giving aid and comfort to, enemies of the United States. Falsifying criminal evidence is neither.

It's not treason. It's fraud. Massive, and criminal. But not treason.

Vindman's testimony supposedly was that he wasn't permitted to edit the transcript to properly reflect what was said. So there is apparently a "different version." That no one's read. Supposedly, depending on who you want to believe.

I'm DC Tom, and I approve this message.

Bob complains Fox is biased, but gets all his medical info from Leafy.com. That's some real cognitive dissonance.

Salafism is a death cult dedicated to creating the conditions for the return of the Caliphate, according to the prophecies of certain hadiths, the which I forget but I recall are non-canonical. But even if you accept those hadiths as true, they're still prophecies. Salafis treat them as instructions: "if you create these conditions, this will happen." That is not how prophecy works, though it is how prophecy has always been misused by apocalyptic death cults throughout history. Which leads to the very considerable theological problem with Salafism: "Islam" literally translates as "submission," and in the religious context means "submission to the will of God." Treating prophecy as instructions, and trying to create conditions that will actively cause (rather than presage) the restoration of the Caliphate, they are not submitting to the will of God, but rather are attempting to submit the will of God to their own. They are literally un-Islamic, in not submitting to Allah's will. Hence, apostate. The majority of Muslims recognize this. They're no more "Islamic" than the Jim Jones' People's Temple was Christian. Side note: three of the conditions for the restoration of the Caliphate involved violence in certain regions. Yemen, Iraq, and Syria.

That's Salafism, not Islam. It's so not Islam that it's fundamentally apostate.

Did it have Miracle Whip on it?

Reminder: the Jacobins did away with the traditional calendar by creating the French Republican Calendar. It wouldn't be the least bit surprising if House Democrats created a new "Social Justice Calendar" that did away with the twelfth of each month, just to ensure the report never gets released.