Looked hard by...interviewing White House officials?
That's like looking for evidence of child molestation in the Catholic Church by only interviewing priests.
The crux of the problem is in the bolded. There's other issues, but at the heart of it is the simple fact that "estimate" and "count" are not the same thing.
Suffers from the same flaws as climate change research does - historical numbers are estimated and interpolated, not directly measured, and means and methods of measurement change with time.
Of course, he didn't look for collusion, he looked to write his usual tome on the inner workings of the White House, as he does for every administration. It's a statement with virtually no credibility.
Gas main explosions are no joke. If you've ever seen the footage of the Pepcon explosion, the second explosion is a 14" gas main. The smaller first explosion is just rocket fuel.
I hear one of them just went out and bought their very first television for it, too.
Like the enclave around Eugene, Oregon, that gets to see Houston at Tennessee, rather than KC and Pittsburgh.
"But how'd they get 65 women to respond in less than two days? They must have prepared this rebuttal letter weeks ago, meaning they were prepared for this story before Feinstein's bombshell. This PROVES the story is true!"
- many, many stories and replies I've read about this.
If she shot a white guy, she'd have been defending herself from a sexual predator, and been a hero.
Remember your victim precedence: black woman > black guy > white woman > dog > horse > hurt feelings > white guy.
Error does not excuse manslaughter. That's why they have a manslaughter charge, in fact: "recklessly causes the death of an individual."
And liberal heads ARE exploding. Because she's a cop who shot a black man.