DC Tom

"Save?" You had it right the first time.

Ah, there's the rub. The subpoenas are still enforceable, because the hold isn't valid if it's issued by a clone of a Supreme Court justice. The Democrats are playing checkers while Trump plays chess while the Democrats play five-dimensional parcheesi.

Anyone bright enough to not call half the country "deplorable" and campaign in Wisconsin would have won that election.

I'm willing to believe she's not doing it out of dishonesty, but she's honestly that ignorant of House ethics rules.

Watching him, I still think he's playing hurt right now.

Really? I mean...do we know Jackson didn't catch all 20 of his own completed passes?

Jesus...Jackson had 43 pass attempts and 25 rushes that day? How many plays total did they run? Did anyone else touch the ball?

The troll level...he's gone plaid.

And of the top 10 names, it's the most normal. Jackson, Aiden, Lucas, and Oliver all agree with me. ("Jackson?" Really? Who the ***** names their kid "Son of Jack?" You know who? Someone who's name ISN'T Jack. ***** idiots.)

Secretaries of Defense, Navy, and the Security Minister? Something's going down...

What part of "I agree" did you misunderstand?

It's not an oversight. The party leadership genuinely doesn't care about moderate Democrats - they believe moderates are Republicans in sheep's clothing.

Trump hasn't been that svelte since...never.

Would this be considered collusion, extortion, quid pro quo, bribery, or some othe crime? Have any Ivy League law professors checked to see if it meets the 1801 Common Law definition of criminal conversation?

I think he misspelled "00b408cce901."

For once, I agree with her. Someone explain how Barron Trump was "attacked." Be sure, when you do, to explain how I just attacked him.

If 17 witnesses against Obama came out and said "I have no first-hand knowledge of wrong-doing, I just don't agree with him," you bet your misspent stoner life they wouldn't prove anything to me. Neither does arguing that Zelensky was coerced into denying coercion. That's batshit insane beghing the question.

I have to sincerely congratulate you on, for once, writing a good comeback.

Let me explain the joke: "yes" refers to "Do you want me crucified?" "What story?" isn't a question meant to be answered, it's a statement to the effect that I didn't see any story. Thereby the implication being I simply want you crucified, regardless of any story. "What story?" being, in this case, a question used as a rhetorical device, which is usually known as a "rhetorical question." It's not something you answer. And truth be told, no, I don't want you crucified. Last thing I want is you made a martyr. I'd rather you were electrocuted by your snowblower, like the idiot you are.

Trudeau looks like one of those claymation puppets from the old Davey and Goliath series.

What happened? Did an austere religious scholar do something in Pensacola?

Yes. What story?

Peter Frampton

Some obscure neo-Nazi thing.