DC Tom

No, you're not. You're too stupid to even lie effectively, you dumbass.

No, you didn't. You didn't use logic. You didn't even use sense. "Desert...irrigation...forest fires! I win!" That's not a argument. That's more like a cognitive spasm.

No...but I like where your head is at.

This would be funnier if we hadn't once had a poster here who did murder his wife. You're an idiot. (Yes, that's my good deed for the day...if I didn't tell you, how would you know?)

Not his first time posting here. He face-planted in to the asphalt a while ago.

Yes, but his response to me will be much, much more hilarious. That's one possible explanation. What's another? DR, want to help him out here?

Losing Nielsen would be a big blow, too. She's doing a reasonably decent job, and trying to get her replacement approved by the next Senate is likely to be a nightmare.

I read that, then said to myself "Gatorman must have posted that chart." Then looked...and, yep.

He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete?

I see it all the time. Just watch a Pats game. ...oh, wait, do you mean called penalties? No, never seen that.

And the IRS intercepted 40% of it...

Of course. He sucked, but he did his best, and he's still a former Bill. You, on the other hand, I would throw something at for asking this stupid question

But...why?????

Nice try, but you're still only good for second place. Try again tomorrow.

And there we go. The dumbest thing I'll see all day.

80 intercepts out of 400 rockets...and that's still a 95% success rate, since Iron Dome doesn't engage anything targeting empty areas. Iron Dome ***** rocks.

Probably because they monitor underground in DC, so they don't have to. You really are a dumb little monkey, aren't you?

To anyone with any discernment, that article is alarmist. There's not much real information in it, if you read it closely.

Read an interesting book this morning on the anthropological research in to the basis of warfare. One of the interesting points it makes is that anthropology rarely studies warfare as an anthropological or social activity. Rather, it studies the tools of warfare, and confuses those with the violence of warfare itself. It put me in mind of this whole "people don't kill people, guns kill people" argument, and made me think that just maybe they're trying to solve the wrong problem...

"Asked to resign."

What the hell is wrong with you?

They didn't have social media in 1968.

EII did not lose! It was a tie!

It's not going to stop his MCU cameos, though.

This time they won't fool around. They'll find a woman to testify he gave her cooties in secind grade. The gloves are off, *****!