DC Tom

Sounds like the basis for a FISA warrant targeting Clinton.

"But that was different!"

They realize it. It's their entire plan: goad people into attacking them, then scream "Victim! Nazis!"

Hint: it's not climate change.

No, it doesn't. Conversely, which would you rather see in a women's prison?

And I'm planning on spending my Thanksgiving not being a complete doucherocket and utterly reprehensible human being. But hey...good luck with your plan.

Critical Race Theory. They felt racially discriminated against.

Roman Catholics? In a Jewish trading house? WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!!!!!111!!!1!!!1

Same cabal that blew up the Pacific Rim economies in the mid-90s? Any updates on that?

Well, duh. How else do polar bears mate? Missionary? Reverse cowboy?

Happy Girthday Bervous Nuy. And Giggalo. Or whatever. You're both idiots.

Reminder: Soros made his fortune going to war with the Bank of England...and winning.

Yes, because it was an opinion piece.

Then explain why Titanic was such a box-office success...

Joke? He actually said that.

Yes, but enough about you, Barry. What do you think about Americans?

But...Prince Charles? He's barely royalty since he was caught saying he wanted to be Camilla's tampon.

I thought it was pretty neat. You managed to accidentally invent a new word. One that made sense, not like "covfefe" or "stimulous." Great. Now I don't have to go to Thanksgiving dinner, I'll just send the bot.

False.

I'm not saying that. 8 USC 1158 says that: Trump can't override that with an EO. That's a crystal-clear written statute, and the judge's order was entirely correct. And yes, that means your illegal crossing can retroactively become legal by claiming and being granted asylum.

Yes, it was. So what?

And it's not something the court should have concerned itself with either way. Really...you're arguing that the court should have sided with Trump to force Congress to legislate? That's progressive-level stupid.

No, HERE we hit the major point of contention: you're arguing something "before recorded history," which by definition means there's no records to support it. I'm at least providing an interpretation based on written and archaeological evidence. Yours is a leap of faith, since there's nothing in the historical record to support it. Our argument is one of science vs. religion. And those rituals and practices originate for the same reason others do: control. Protestantism, the Enlightenment, liberalism...all reactions to that centralized control of mythology that binds society. The illiberalism of modern progressivism is the exertion of that control, on the other hand - an attempt to reconstruct/recreate societal mythology (thus the destruction of Confederate symbolism, "conservative, traditional" identity structures, even known history, and attempt to replace them with new ones.)

The lower-left cartoon is one of the least informative things I've ever seen.