When did it become the role of prosecutors to question the legitimacy of an electoral victory? This must be a recent development. The legitimacy of Barack Obama’s election went unchallenged by the law even though he wrote a fake autobiography and, before his second win, secretly (he thought) promised Russia to be more flexible once those reactionary American voters reelected him.
What? Cohen's guilty of...acting like an editor choosing which stories do and do not get reported? When does the editorial staff of the New York Times get prosecuted?
Patriots just gave up a game-winning TD to the Dolphins that included two laterals.
Belichick is going to bite the head of a defensive back after that.
That Wired article is hilarious.
Still, after two years, no one can explain what exactly was done, how it was done, or who did it. The ENTIRETY of the evidence - no, of the crime - is "Trump people talked to Russians."
Note to high school boys: when they say "see a doctor if it lasts more than four hours," that only applies if you've taken medicine, not if you've received nude photos from Miss Kentucky.
They could have mugged him on the street and not taken anything, or suicided him in Ft. Marcy Park, or poisoned him with Polonium when they had him in custody...
So to be clear...the Post is complaining about journalists with no diplomatic experience being appointed to UN Ambassador. But has nothing to say about James Russell Wiggins?
Muslems did make great scientific advancements in, among other disciplines, astronomy.
A thousand years ago...and it's not NASA's job to make Muslims feel good about it. But let's not conflate being anti-Obama's-social-justice-idiocy with being anti-Islam.