DC Tom

Hit 'em where it hurts: their ability to work for free.

Well, that headline's not at all biased.

Then shut the ***** up.

Unsurprisingly. He got that quote from me. I know, it sounds unlikely, time travel and all. But then...he got the idea for A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court from somewhere, didn't he? WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!!!!!

We don't have a "Russia problem." We have a "stupid people believe everything they see on Facebook problem." And those same stupid people want Facebook to curate content for them, so they can continue to believe everything they see on Facebook. Because they are stupid people.

That's not "undermining the rule of law." How has that impacted the rule of law, at all? What "Russian thing?" Buying ads on Facebook?

Sorry, I thought you were referring to Trump's abuse of power...

And what abuse of power is that?

Yes, semantics, because "checks and balances" has a SPECIFIC CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION.

I'm sure he and I would hate each other, and have a blast together.

It really depends on your choice of topology. In some orbifold mappings, the earth is indeed flat. In others, it's shaped like a chimichanga.

Stop being purposelessly obtuse. FBI raids of attorney's offices and tweets from National Review columnists are not checks and balances on the president. That's not what "checks and balances" mean. Words having meaning.

McCarthy's tweet represents neither a check nor a balance on the presidency. Nor does the FBI raiding Cohen's office. Try again. Use the big hint I just gave you...

How is he not?

I disagree with the wall...but honestly, who in their right mind believes Schumer has the country's or any citizen's interests at heart?

Any mugshots of her after having sex with a high school student?

"Hold my sippy cup and watch this..." - gator

The Post's article is fiction, for the most part. Putin was helping Trump get elected after he was elected? What is that, an X-K-Red-27 technique?

Okay. You've earned my disdain.

I'm not too sure about that. Even Oxford admits to serious structural deficiencies. And the Post's article on it is fairly dishonest. It treats social media as critical national security infrastructure, and deigns to clutch its pearls at the treason of public ads on a public platform in rubles. And contradicts itself in saying the Russian effort was to get Trump elected "with a particular spike after the 2016 election." That demonstrates the preconceived notion at the heart of the dishonesty.

Because what downsizing family doesn't need a private alcove for the cello?

No, I'm not saying that at all. Believing a guy would get the funding to construct approximately a 22 billion dollar wall all the way along the Southern border that goes through private land American Indian land (hello legal battles) and mountains with an annual estimated maintenance fee of 750 million dollars isn't "being tricked." It's being stupid.

It's an idiotic idea that won't work, and is far more expensive than is being claimed.

Unless the complaint was "Goddammit, what are we paying you for???" That would be a valid complaint.

Which they'll win. The Culinary Institute of America is over-reliant on drone delivery.