DC Tom

I agree...but I'm playing devil's advocate. Lots of people don't agree with us...and lots of people consider "hate speech" violence and thus consider it morally acceptable to respond to it with physical violence. You don't have to look very far for those opinions.

Yes, you have. You just don't see it for what it is. Now that might be because you're not on the inside looking out, like I am. But yes, he gets a lot of criticism for it.

When fighting against violence...like Yoyo Minneapolis or whatever-the-*****-his-name-is giving a speech at Berkeley.

Hey, as long as your party succeeds, everyone else can suffer. And should suffer.

When you're Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder...

There are many who think human trafficking doesn't exist, though, or is extremely rare. 7000 prosecuted cases in 2017, with 12000 identified victims. He already has gone out on that limb. And he gets massive criticism for it.

There's an estimated 5000-8000 white supremacists in the US. The largest party - National Alliance - claims 1500 members. Antifa is a movement more than a group, and as such is much more diffuse and undefined. Those estimate range from 4000-175000. A good proxy is probably socialist party membership - the PSL has a membership of approx. 30,000. But the nature of both groups means that membership tends to be very fluid (groups dissolve and reform, members belong to multiple groups or move from group to group.) 5000-8000 and 30,000 are hard numbers, but should be considered representative of order-of-magnitude estimates only (thus indicating that antifa and white supremacist numbers are roughly equivalent). In truth, no one really knows.

Don't associate your suckitude with my posts, ass-brain.

Yes...he was from Africa.

I don't have a problem with Black Panther being a superhero. I have a problem with people thinking he's African.

#FakeHoliday. Seriously...an "African" holiday invented in Los Angeles in 1966 that manages to be less African than Black Panther? Get the ***** outta here with that *****...

Let's see...your party manipulated their own primaries to alienate their own far-left wing, and ran a candidate that appealed to only the coastal and urban liberal elite base, who went out of her way to alienate roughly 60% of the country - who made alienating 60% of the country part of her campaign platform. And lost the election to a sweet potato. HELL YES the liberals are to blame for Trump. You could have run an actual sweet potato against Trump, and won. Hillary Clinton is the worst presidential candidate in history, through the simple fact that she lost to someone who otherwise would have been the worst candidate in history.

Nope.

Yeah, sure von Paulus.

You're not just ignorant, you're bizarrely ignorant.

Do I even care?

That's because you're a numbskull. The Nazi platform to racially purify central Europe, promote the Volkes connection to the soil, and fight the "Jewish-Bolshevik" conspiracy require the acquisition and colonization of lebensraum. The Nazi genocidal platform drives the need for war, not the other way around.

Some are orange...

Active war zone?

The Soviet Union in World War 2. Revolutionary France. Ba'athist Iraq. The Ottomans during the Balkan War and World War I.

Point of note: I'm accused of being a Fox News watcher all the ***** time because I form independent thoughts based solely on my own personal knowledge and research that coincidentally agree with what's being said on Fox by some talking head I couldn't pick out of a line-up. Many people believe it's impossible for the other side to think for themselves.

Because he is batshit crazy. Doesn't make him wrong, though.

It was not a product of war. It would be more accurate to say the war was a product of the Holocaust. The genocide of the Native Americans was not a product of war, either. Such "American-Indian" wars as there were, were almost always fallout from genocidal policies (e.g. the Seminole Wars), not the other way around.

That's the way it usually works. Any theory that can't face skepticism isn't worth a bucket of warm *****. (See: Warming, Global.)

Because the media isn't even trying to do their job anymore. They're just making ***** up as they go along. It's Acosta's fault. Everyone learned from him that proselytizing is more important and more effective than reporting, and those who didn't don't have the space to do their jobs, because they're edged out by the proselytizers.